Notices
Lancer General Come on in and discuss the US Lancer.

Gain expectation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 03:51 PM
  #1  
blaze_125's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 1
From: QC
Gain expectation

I might change employer soon. The employer I might go with is talking about a 3000CDN$ (2258US$) bonus on the first paycheck to switch over to his company.

So I'm kind of planning what I would do with that money and try to figure out what kind of gain I would get from the mods.

Let say I went with the Following:

Test pipe: 2-3%
Header: 2-3%
Intake manifold: 2-3%
Piggyback: 12%
Already have intake: 1%

Are my number good or am I way off?
What final HP output would I get from all that?
Does 147hp(at the crank) sounds about right?

Should I go a different route? (forget about turbo I ain't got that kind of money)

Last edited by blaze_125; Feb 9, 2004 at 03:54 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 03:58 PM
  #2  
Guru_Del's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 0
From: Lake Elsinore, CA
honestly. i would go with TEIN basic's, sway bar w/perches. strut bar and a piggy back.

that will get you some mad handling and some good power.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 03:58 PM
  #3  
jon_e_blaze's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: j-ville, fl
i would definitley consider turbo (i know you said don't think aboutit). if you spent another grand to get the non - ic'ed kit, you would see far more gains than all of those combined.

anyway, your numbers are pretty accurate (give or take a % or 2). your route seems pretty good, but personally i would drop the test pipe and go full exhaust with high flow cat. and i would definitely get the tb to match the intake manifold. after all of that i say you would have between 130 - 140 whp.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 04:01 PM
  #4  
blaze_125's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 1
From: QC
Originally posted by jon_e_blaze
130 - 140 whp
That much at the rubber? Stock we've got what? 95-98whp?
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 04:03 PM
  #5  
blaze_125's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 1
From: QC
Originally posted by Guru_Del
honestly. i would go with TEIN basic's, sway bar w/perches. strut bar and a piggy back.
My progress spring will be in within the next few days, and strut and sway bars will be purchased on a different pay check
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 04:06 PM
  #6  
Alchemist's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 0
From: Lynnwood, WA
No bro' skip messing with your exhaust all together until you can afford FI. NA engines DO NOT like to be "wide open" as the term goes. Jon_e's right though, if you're gonna get the mani, get the TB, too.
I doubt his numbers unless you have some pretty hefty tools to tune your piggyback with (and I'd recommend the eManage with support tool to do the fuel mgt. The only catch is you'll need a laptop to run the software). Why do I doubt it? Rhyzin's running 5PSI and is only making about 133WHP. I've got most of what you're talking about and, admittedly the eManage is turned off to get baseline #s, I'm only putting down about 114. even IF the eManage can get me 12% more power, that's just under 128WHP. Sure, not bad, but I'm not thinking I'm the peak performance machine on the road. Forget what you've heard about 120CHP yielding 109WHP, it's closer to 102 on the ground.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 04:07 PM
  #7  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
Originally posted by blaze_125
That much at the rubber? Stock we've got what? 95-98whp?
Stock should push 102 or 103 at the rubber. They dynoed one at Buschur for an Import Tuner article a while back (see here).
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 04:13 PM
  #8  
blaze_125's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 1
From: QC
Originally posted by jon_e_blaze
if you spent another grand to get the non - ic'ed kit, you would see far more gains than all of those combined.
Actually, that would be 2g. 1 for the kit and 1 for installation, unless I got lucky and talked my uncle to install it for me.

Anybody has the price of the RPW stage 1 turbo setup. I went on their website but they don't post prices anymore. And I am still waiting for them to reply my e-mail
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 04:29 PM
  #9  
thereasonsf3's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
SAVE IT FOR TURBO OR SUPER CHARGE MAN!!!! your half way there, then your income tax refund is coming back very soon. save it.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 04:42 PM
  #10  
jaymz916's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, Nv.
I know this question probably has been answered a thousand times before, but, okay so you spend 4 grand on the turbo, you gotta spend another 4 to five just making it so the turbo won't destroy the stock crappy engine. You need new pistons, rods, injectors, fuel pump....etc the list goes on and on right? Please correct me if I'm wrong because I got no problem dropping 4-5 grand and getting that kind of hp but not if a week later my pistons get obliterated. The car's gotta last at least till i've paid the damn thing off.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 04:43 PM
  #11  
blaze_125's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 1
From: QC
Originally posted by thereasonsf3
then your income tax refund is coming back very soon. save it.
Yeah, but income tax is gonna slap me this year Don't know how much, but I know I'll have to pay
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 04:45 PM
  #12  
blaze_125's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 1
From: QC
Originally posted by jaymz916
You need new pistons, rods, injectors, fuel pump....etc the list goes on and on right? Please correct me if I'm wrong because I got no problem dropping 4-5 grand and getting that kind of hp but not if a week later my pistons get obliterated. The car's gotta last at least till i've paid the damn thing off.
Pistons can last under 8 psi
Fuel pump, i think it is part of the kit
Injectors, i think it is part of the kit
Rods... I don't know
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 04:46 PM
  #13  
IILANCERII02's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
From: Naperville
ya i know my dad was pissed that he isnt getting as much back as he watned... so he's been grumpy lol.

and for jaymz im pretty sure you go the non IC kit from RRM you will be fine running like 4-6psi and like IC kit with like 7-8psi just fine on the stock parts, im not 100% but someone will correct me if im wrong.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 04:54 PM
  #14  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
OK, to actually follow your original question, let's assume you don't turbo. You're getting a LOT of money to play with. You said you're handling the handling, so I'll ignore that.

I fully agree with you on the header, intake, and piggyback. That's $1150 american. I'd also suggest the throttle body (let's round up to $1500). Then let's say test pipe and cat-back exhaust, we're at 2k. I'd guess that tax and shipping with cover the rest, so you'll have a nice setup going off that. And I'm quite jealous of you.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2004 | 05:07 PM
  #15  
Hotshot940's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
theres no way your gonna spend 5 grand after the turbo in stuff to make it not blow up...its called rrm...they run like 7psi non intercooled on stock motor, no exhaust or anything, i think that have 9 on intercooled, i could be wrong it might be 5 and 7 respectivley...pistons are weak on the lancer, rods will hold p to about 280 hp if im not mistaken
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:04 AM.