Notices
Lancer General Come on in and discuss the US Lancer.

who doesn't think the lancer is slow?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 08:38 AM
  #31  
spek2442's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Long...LONG LONG LONG island
indeed, shiftin is essential
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 09:00 AM
  #32  
jaymz916's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, Nv.
No the lancer is not a speed machine, it was built for economy, but I do agree that it accepts mods pretty well, I have a rrm header, aem cai on it, and just yesterday put on the rrm ported throttle body and wow it made a hella difference, big jump in acceleration, def worth the money. But as far as all the evo talk compared to the lancer, cocky evo owners can lick my ***. Don't get me wrong, the evo is an awesome machine, but it aint the best or the fastest, and the cocky evo owners around here need to stop comparin' it to the base lancer. It's no different than me sayin that my bike would whoop the snot out of an evo, hell, even modify it, I'll still kill it. My bike runs 10.5 in the quarter STOCK, now that's it's modded too, I'll take any evo or sti. But I don't compare the two because they are two totally diffferent things, just like the 4g94, and the 4g63, two totally different engines, not to mention the drivetrain.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 09:31 AM
  #33  
neilschelly's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 986
Likes: 0
From: Merrimack, NH
Originally Posted by twisty1251
hi. i currently own a 2004 oz rally and i was wondering why people think it is so slow. i know it doesn't 12.0s but it's still got some ummpf. from my experience my car has held its own against all those riced out civics that think they are fast. also do the 2001-2003 have auto overdrive? i know my car does and it really makes a difference. I have an auto and i noticed that when i floor it then car doesn't really accelerate that fast but when i quickly press the pedal about a 1/4 way downm it will accelerate a lot faster and it also turns on the overdrive. this works really well when passing on the freeway. anyone else try this?
Overdrive has nothing to do with performance, or at least it's not there for increased performance. It's a reference to the drive ratios in the transmission. 4th gear (manual) and 3rd gear (auto) are roughly 1:1. Anything higher than that, like 5th gear(manual) or 4th gear (auto) are overdrive gears. Turning off overdrive on your car would make your tranny top out in 3rd gear, lose the fuel mileage benefits of the overdrive gear, and gain power in that the car won't shift out of 3rd and stay in the top of the power band.
-N
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 09:46 PM
  #34  
Arithmetic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,856
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Exclamation

Originally Posted by Fevo7
Well, I've owned a built LS/VTec 3g Integra, built 1g integra, and an sr powered 1g nissan 240. I definiely miss the hp these cars can put up. And as a matter of fact, I'm tired of dealing with the slowness of the OZ lancers and I'm buying either another 240 or a 1g gsx and swap a bigger turbo and add extra goodies to it. The lancer, by far, is SLOOOOOOW.
And I know for a fact, the lancer can't hang with even a close to stock civic ex and definitely not a civic si, definitely not a 140hp stock integra or the 170hp integra gsr or 140hp stock 240. Maybe can take a civic vx or even a dx....i doubt the hx. I doubt we could beat cavaliers or sunfires. You also have to think, most people who are going to want to race....their civics or integras aren't going to be stock. More people are tuning cars now thanks to fast and the furious (i hate that movie ever came out, but it's a decent movie) I'm thinking, if cavaliers can beat us......we need to either spend more money on the car...or say screw it and buy something with more power and more potential.
^^^ whoa, easy there cowboy . I feel you on alot of subjects. I dont feel like my lancer is sllllllooow as hell, but i def want something faster. Unlike alot of yall, i havent incounter anybody wanting to race me at a light yet and i have an evo7 spoiler and grill and debadge and some other mods. If anything, honda owners stop look and say 'nah man, its those ****in evos', im like naaaaw its a lancer... race me, haha. Still im getting a wrx and just gonna improve on that, it has all the right ingridiants for a speed platform, than trade it in later for an sTI or evo
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 10:00 PM
  #35  
Hotshot940's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
one word...TURBO









and three letters...RRM
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 10:31 PM
  #36  
AznFlip's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
It is true! Lancer is slow, especially when you have a stock 120hp (probably 90whp).. From my experience, when driving in the long hill.....man, it is hard to accelerate. Last time, a SUB cut me off...
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 02:34 AM
  #37  
Boni's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, CA.
the evo that i smoked doesn't think lancers are slow anymore ... at least the turbo ones
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 03:54 AM
  #38  
thereasonsf3's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
lmao
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 04:16 AM
  #39  
pearlwhiteoz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: THE OC. California
i thought its a known fact that Lancer ES,LS, OZ are not a fast cars, not even quick at all, its just a compact saden. only RA can gets the sport sedan title, and EVO can get the super car title
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 04:17 AM
  #40  
pearlwhiteoz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: THE OC. California
Originally Posted by aznflip2o6
It is true! Lancer is slow, especially when you have a stock 120hp (probably 90whp).. From my experience, when driving in the long hill.....man, it is hard to accelerate. Last time, a SUB cut me off...
haha i agree, the car is lack of power!, specially when you have like 1 or more passanger in the car, if mitsubishi put the 120hp engine in a 2 door 2 seater, maybe itd be a lot faster
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 06:31 AM
  #41  
blaze_125's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 1
From: QC
Originally Posted by twisty1251
who doesn't think the lancer is slow?
The Tiburon I raced from a roll yesterday certainly don't think we're slow (wasn't the V6)
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 12:56 PM
  #42  
4g94T's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by pearlwhiteoz
haha i agree, the car is lack of power!, specially when you have like 1 or more passanger in the car, if mitsubishi put the 120hp engine in a 2 door 2 seater, maybe itd be a lot faster
that would be tight if our lancers are two doors
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 08:14 PM
  #43  
kreeskid99's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: clovis, nm
i love my lancer. i have my headers just waiting to put them on because still waitin on intake and exhaust with my ken style body kit. just seems like never ending mods. i would love to have an evo but i like that i am kinda building my own evo but from the ground up!!!!
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 08:29 PM
  #44  
Regulator's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: dartmouth, ma
Originally Posted by pearlwhiteoz
haha i agree, the car is lack of power!, specially when you have like 1 or more passanger in the car, if mitsubishi put the 120hp engine in a 2 door 2 seater, maybe itd be a lot faster

One of the members at the Mirage board put a 4G94 into his coupe. He ran a 16.6 (or maybe a 16.4, I forget) with the engine being stock.

So no, it's still not a lot faster, lol.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 08:36 PM
  #45  
alainusmc's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, NC
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by Regulator
One of the members at the Mirage board put a 4G94 into his coupe. He ran a 16.6 (or maybe a 16.4, I forget) with the engine being stock.

So no, it's still not a lot faster, lol.
Plus if the lancer was made into a 2-door model, why not just go back to the mirage. Thats why the lancer was unleashed, to make a 4 door sports car.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:43 PM.