Notices
Lancer Tranny/Drivetrain Tech Anything drivetrain related can be discussed here.

fidanza flywheel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 04:01 PM
  #1  
jon_e_blaze's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: j-ville, fl
fidanza flywheel

ok, i was on the performance tuning website http://www.ptuning.com and i saw that this company fidanza is coming out with a flywheel for the '02-'03 lancers.

has anybody ever heard of fidanza? are they a good company?

and as far as the flywheel, besides reving faster what are the benefits of a performance flywheel?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 05:27 PM
  #2  
Tweak3D's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 333
Likes: 1
From: Tacoma, Washington
=P

good read about flywheel performance stuff.

http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/7177/flywheel.html

-Justin
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 05:39 PM
  #3  
evofan@scorp's's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Victorville, CA
Good read. Would timing have to be adjusted with a flywheel? It said there would be a rough idle-I would just like to know how rough.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 06:13 PM
  #4  
jon_e_blaze's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: j-ville, fl
thanks tweak. but about this idling issue. if the timing would help correct this situation, would the rrm piggy back be a good mod to accompany this or would their timing adjustments worsen the problem?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 06:36 PM
  #5  
Tweak3D's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 333
Likes: 1
From: Tacoma, Washington
well, from the way I understand it, tighter timings that the piggy back would give you would make it rougher. It says it is not so bad on stock timings because they are spread out quite a bit. It might have more to do with the cam though. Anyone else have any input?

-Justin
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 08:52 PM
  #6  
evofan@scorp's's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Victorville, CA
bump
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 08:57 PM
  #7  
03RallyLancer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
From: Redneck KY
lightend flywheels serve 2 purposes, 1 revs faster like you mentioned, and 2 frees up a few more ponies b/c the engine is working as hard to spin it, less leaching. as for timing ive never heard of a fly wheel messing up timing on a motor before.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 09:18 PM
  #8  
jon_e_blaze's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: j-ville, fl
the article tweak posted mentioned that a lightened flywheel is usually accompanied by a rough idle. if that were true, then i was just wondering how to go about correcting it or if it was a problem you would have to live with. i really don't know much of anything about these flywheels.

so has anyone even heard of fidanza?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 09:34 PM
  #9  
fkrzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: Westchester, NY
Lightend Flywheels reduce rotating mass, making the car rev freely, nothing to do with timming. And advancing timming, like the piggyback does raises your idle
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 09:37 PM
  #10  
jon_e_blaze's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: j-ville, fl
so this whole flywheel thing sounds like to much of a pain in the ***. would it really be that beneficial (bang for buck) for a NA lancer?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 10:04 PM
  #11  
swhskenr's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
in my opinion it would be a some bang for the buck if you really had plans for the future.. imo this would have to accompany some beefy na mods with LSD and dampening suspension in mind to really take advantage of the full effect.. i can just see all that money and effort going to waste without thinking in that route...

my .02
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 10:24 PM
  #12  
jon_e_blaze's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: j-ville, fl
point well taken. this is no mod for a light tuner, na or forced induction. you gotta go ***** to the wall with your tuning to get your money out of this. i love my car and all, but i'm happy with a quick car. i'm not really looking to go fast. i think i'll stick to intake exhaust type mods.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 02:20 PM
  #13  
pjal84's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 0
From: Up to 80 miles north of Gilroy
Whooooa...lot of misinformation. You guys are not understanding the difference between cam timing and ignition timing. A high lift cam like mine and Ura's holds open the valves (intake side more so than exhaust) longer in order to cram more air into the cylinder (more air=more power). Then you have cam gears which are essentially moving the powerband forward in the most basic of terms. Ignition timing (what the reflash changed along with fuel curves (how much/when) and timing [yes, fuel has a degree of timing as well: how long you hold open injectors] and I'm still not sure the piggydoes) is where the spark plug fires in relation to the location of the piston in the cylinder. As for a lighter flywheel in general, RPW has repeatedly said sure you can do it, but the car already has a relatively lightweight piece and without substantially higher horsepower numbers, your driveability is going to suck unless you are constantly keeping the car in the powerband since the revs would drop quickly between shifts. http://www.racetep.com/flywheel.html <---a better read overall (even though it is an ad more or less) but they do press the point like I said a) driveability suffers if you're not in the upper rev ranges and b) removing weight off an overly heavy flywheel is good (Starion which uses a 2.7L truck engine in the USA and thus was never really meant to scale the rev range), but like off a lancer, would not be terribly beneficial

Last edited by pjal84; Jan 7, 2004 at 02:33 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 08:28 PM
  #14  
swhskenr's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
is that misinfo to the rough idle or the not really worth it comment i made?

I didn't think it produced a rough idle but still feel it isn't worth the money.. it looks like you may agree...

"but like off a lancer, would not be terribly beneficial " - pjal
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 11:43 AM
  #15  
jon_e_blaze's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: j-ville, fl
this sounds like more worry than it's worth. i'll probably just get a new clutch and pressure plate from rrm.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:13 PM.