2005 Mercedes-Benz CL65 AMG
2005 Mercedes-Benz CL65 AMG
6.0 liters of V12 Twin Turbocharged @ 11 psi per cylinder bank; industrial sized air-to-water intercooler; high lift/duration camshafts.
The production model is detuned to 738 lb/ft of torque at 3000 rpm and 604 hp at 5500 rpm.
Pre-production models belted out 885 lb/ft of torque and had to be detuned for transmission longevity.
Paddle-shift 5-speed automatic with AMG Speed Shift technology good for a
0-60 Ferrari shredding time of 3.8 seconds (in a 4500 pound luxury missile).
The quarter mile blurs by in 11.8@120.9 mph. Show-quality carbon fiber engine cover included. Breaks the bank to the tune of $180,000.
Happy motoring.

PS- wonder what would happen if you slipped in an HKS EVC inside that bad cat.
The production model is detuned to 738 lb/ft of torque at 3000 rpm and 604 hp at 5500 rpm.
Pre-production models belted out 885 lb/ft of torque and had to be detuned for transmission longevity.
Paddle-shift 5-speed automatic with AMG Speed Shift technology good for a
0-60 Ferrari shredding time of 3.8 seconds (in a 4500 pound luxury missile).
The quarter mile blurs by in 11.8@120.9 mph. Show-quality carbon fiber engine cover included. Breaks the bank to the tune of $180,000.
Happy motoring.

PS- wonder what would happen if you slipped in an HKS EVC inside that bad cat.
Last edited by 02MaximizedVQ; Nov 2, 2004 at 08:44 PM.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
From: dublin, oxford, chillicothe OH
Originally Posted by 3000ways
Simply awesome, I love Merecedes, if only I were rich, I have me three EVOs and one of those.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
From: dublin, oxford, chillicothe OH
It's all in the image. You can make a 5.0 mustang as fast as an Enzo, but it's still a 5.0 Mustang. In this case it's less extreme but the same concept in a way, except they're both stock, not modded.
Personally I'd pay less and take the one with less of an image but I guess if you've got cash to burn, why not?
Then again you have to take into consideration the extreme R&D on the SLR, that probably wasn't put into the CLK.
Personally I'd pay less and take the one with less of an image but I guess if you've got cash to burn, why not?
Then again you have to take into consideration the extreme R&D on the SLR, that probably wasn't put into the CLK.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by 02MaximizedVQ
... Pre-production models belted out 885 lb/ft of torque and had to be detuned for transmission longevity. ...
Seriously. And who makes the transmission? Caterpillar? 900lb-ft belongs in a damn tractor truck, not a car. That's just insane.
Last edited by MisterSpoot; Nov 1, 2004 at 06:23 PM.
IMO, the SL65 is way better than the SLR. That 600 grand POS is ugly and flashy doors and wheels dont cover up the fact that it's not a real supercar. It can go 207 mph and had a ton of hp but if you read reviews of it, magazines don't really like the car as a whole because of the cheap interior and especially NO MANUAL TRANNY!! The SL65 is so much more practical and luxurious with its glass roof/retractable hardtop and torque out the wahoo.
I'd take that EVO FQ-400 over the SLR anyday.
I'd take that EVO FQ-400 over the SLR anyday.
One of these came up to my work yesturday, I did not even notice it was a SL65 and not a SL55 until I saw the V12 with the Bi-Turbo over it. I work at a Home Depot in Plano nights and weekends and we get an SL55 at least 3-4 times a week up there. This was the first SL65 though, it did not even sound like anything special when at idel, but I damn sure knew what it was.
a friend of mine has an sl65 and I followed him home from a racing event at a local track where we got to drive all of the 05 amgs on the road course, and that sl65 is freaking nasty.
My friends dad just picked up a silver cl65amg friday. I can't wait to get a ride in that thing. It's gonna be nasty. His mom has an 03 or 04 s600 and his dad also has a 2000 or 2001 sl600. It must be nice to have that kinda money. the base price on the cl65amg is 178K if I'm not mistaken.
-Chad-
-Chad-



