Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

Cadillac CTS-V 0-60 in 3.9 seconds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 02:31 AM
  #1  
E. Haskell's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: NC
Cadillac CTS-V 0-60 in 3.9 seconds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zE7M-...layer_embedded

119 mph trap speed!
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 09:30 AM
  #2  
S6devil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: NYC
i think 0-60 is sooo 90's .... today, minivans do 6second 0-60's... move on
what about track time, what about slalom, steering feel, braking, handling....
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 11:57 AM
  #3  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by S6devil
i think 0-60 is sooo 90's .... today, minivans do 6second 0-60's... move on
what about track time, what about slalom, steering feel, braking, handling....
Seriously? You've not heard how the new CTS-V handles? Its better then the M5.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 12:02 PM
  #4  
CroatianKid's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: Underneath the moon by a tree
Yeah dude the CTS-v beats the m5 around the nurburing(sorry if spelt wrong)
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 12:10 PM
  #5  
S6devil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: NYC
yes i heard, and read. i even said in another post, that when i saw the CTS-V at the car show, i was impressed

my point was that "quoting 0-60" isnt fun anymore. that # alone should Not be the topic of discussion when talking about a performance car, because it has become meaningless in the last few years
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 12:17 PM
  #6  
Skylineracer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Clifton New Jersey Lived: Daytona Beach, Florida Lived: Port Orange, Florida
this is why i am picking one up after i am done paying the evo. Tire shredding here i come LMAO. sickly enough if i recall it stops better than the ix's do ?
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 12:18 PM
  #7  
Skylineracer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Clifton New Jersey Lived: Daytona Beach, Florida Lived: Port Orange, Florida
Originally Posted by CroatianKid
Yeah dude the CTS-v beats the m5 around the nurburing(sorry if spelt wrong)
not only that its the fastest 4-door around that track ever
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 12:35 PM
  #8  
S6devil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: NYC
for those who care about more than just tire shredding, the interior is surprisingly upscale. as i mentioned in another post, its on par with Germans....
suede, and stitched leather galore! seats are very supportive and hug well, steering wheel is thick, nice material, and easy to turn and hold, gauges and dials are elec luminescent, and the dashboard and console is ergonomically proper, nice materials and colors, good layout...

Last edited by S6devil; Apr 17, 2009 at 12:38 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 12:58 PM
  #9  
UT_Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 0
From: SL,UT
Originally Posted by Skylineracer
not only that its the fastest 4-door around that track ever
Wasn't that record held by the RS4? Did it really get beat out?

NVM, I just checked... 7:59! To the RS4's 8:09, which got beat by the E92 anyway.

Go GM!

Now if only they wouldn't have gotten rid of the Cobalt SS... They need a good low end niche car like that too.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 01:03 PM
  #10  
E. Haskell's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by S6devil
i think 0-60 is sooo 90's .... today, minivans do 6second 0-60's... move on
what about track time, what about slalom, steering feel, braking, handling....
All the numbers are impressive...0-60 is just of them. Under 4 seconds for a luxury car is hauling ****. A 119 mph trap speed is also serious business.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 01:04 PM
  #11  
lexat20's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 1
From: thrillville, IL
Its ashame the V series will disappear next year.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 01:42 PM
  #12  
S6devil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Originally Posted by UT_Evo
Wasn't that record held by the RS4? Did it really get beat out?

NVM, I just checked... 7:59! To the RS4's 8:09, which got beat by the E92 anyway.

.

RS4???? why would this even be a question?? CTSV has 130 more Hp, and less weight than the RS4!
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 01:44 PM
  #13  
S6devil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Originally Posted by lexat20
Its ashame the V series will disappear next year.
i spoke to a rep, he said they wont stop making it. they just reassigned the design team, so nothing new will come from V... but whatever is already in production (the 3 'V' cars) will continue for a few years to come, till the end of its life cycle.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 01:50 PM
  #14  
UT_Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 0
From: SL,UT
Originally Posted by S6devil
RS4???? why would this even be a question?? CTSV has 130 more Hp, and less weight than the RS4!
Because last I heard/cared about any of that the RS4 was the record holder for fastest 4 door on the 'ring? You don't have to be a dick about it. I'm not a super-fan of either, I don't know their weight or hp numbers. Hell, all I really know is that the RS4 is awd, and the V is not.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 06:54 PM
  #15  
fromWRXtoEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,087
Likes: 5
From: Tucson
This is something that I have been emphasizing for a while folks. The manual transmission cars that involves your clutch pedal action are becoming more and more in disavantage to either automatics or dual clutch type transmissions.

You can look left and right and you will find it just about everywhere. The new Auto transmissions are compact, light and both eficicient not just on gas mileage but also in performance. These transmissions allow you to keep the boost steady while shifting(turbo aplications) and off course there is no marging for error.

Yeap!! GM sinking but here is the fastest sedan for the show(0-60, 1/4 mile, Nurburgring). This car kicks serious a$$ for real...


Carlos
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:09 PM.