Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

Article on STi, EVO, RSX-S, Mazdaspeed, etc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 2, 2004 | 11:24 AM
  #1  
ytsejam's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: NOR-CAL
Article on STi, EVO, RSX-S, Mazdaspeed, etc

dunno if this is a repost, but check this article out anyways:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...es/print.phtml
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2004 | 04:24 PM
  #2  
hueman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 2
From: northern virginia
I don't get why the evo lost to the sti? was it purely based on acceleration times?
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2004 | 05:56 PM
  #3  
evo_dan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Originally posted by hueman
I don't get why the evo lost to the sti? was it purely based on acceleration times?
I don't understand where you got that from. I don't think the cars are listed in any particular order. Here's a quote from that article:

The Evo's awd uses a viscous coupling, and the car was the best handler in the test. It generated the quickest lap times, highest slalom speed and most grip on the skidpad. And, for many of our drivers, it was the most fun. The steering is extremely quick, accurate and communicative, and the 5-speed transmission allows light, precise shifts. This car was the easiest to drive fast. And Brembo brakes stopped it fast.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2004 | 08:02 PM
  #4  
hueman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 2
From: northern virginia
Originally posted by evo_dan


I don't understand where you got that from. I don't think the cars are listed in any particular order. Here's a quote from that article:

i figured the cars were listed in a specific order after reading this:

Here's a car with a torquey, 175-hp 4-cylinder, 6-speed transmission, limited-slip differential, firmed-up suspension and meaty 215/45R17 tires. So why is it here near the end of the pack?
and realizing that the celica was physically listed in the article as near the end...
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2004 | 08:12 PM
  #5  
Chiketkd's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 101
Likes: 3
From: Charlottesville, VA
Good article. I also agree with hueman, the cars are listed in order from best to worse and I don't understand why the Evo came in 2nd.

Either way, the testers at Popular Mechanics got some pretty quick times for the AWD cars, but the FWD cars got pretty slow times for what I've seen in other magazines. Maybe the conditions weren't ideal.
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:47 AM.