Notices

P1808

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 09:01 AM
  #16  
kmart888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Burbank CA
Originally Posted by lousEVOxmr
wow, one after the other we go....
wheres mitsu in all of this .......
can you bring this thread over beside mine in the other forum?
Done!
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 03:36 PM
  #17  
kmart888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Burbank CA
I picked up my MR-T from WORKS today, I ended up installing a new SST gearbox ($$$), an SSP cooler, and an SSP deep sump. I chose to retain the OEM clutch packs and fill with OEM Diaqueen fluid.

I am very pleased with the work done by WORKS Motorsports but disappointed in their lack of timeliness and misinformation during the repairs, no way should this have taken over three months to complete!

While the SST was out I had them install a BBX turbo and AEM "Widemouth" DP and I asked for a conservative 91 octane tune; the car runs great! Spikes at 28 psi and holds 25 psi to 7500 rpms, it "only" made 348 hp on WORKS dyno but it feels every bit as fast as my 370 hp (different dyno) E85 tune on the stock turbo ! Launch control works perfectly as before and I have little doubt it will run low 12's as it sits and high 11's with an E85 tune, time will tell.

The BBX does feel sluggish compared to the stock turbo at part throttle (tip in) below 3000 rpm's but this is no biggie, it does not affect racing and and if in sport/auto mode it's only noticeable when making a standing start; changed right foot technique solves this problem is only noticeable when making a standing start if and it can probably be tuned out. Also I am getting a bit poorer gas milage (I actually expected better milage) but this also can be tuned out I Hope.

For the last three months I have used the Honda S2000 as my DD and this car is no slouch in the "fun to drive" category but I had forgotten just how sweet the Evo X MR was! The Evo wins the "fun to drive" from the Honda no contest, the MR is the only car I have owned that has me inventing places to drive just for the fun of it when I am not busy.

Last edited by kmart888; Dec 24, 2010 at 11:12 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2011 | 05:37 PM
  #18  
evoibad's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by kmart888
I picked up my MR-T from WORKS today, I ended up installing a new SST gearbox ($$$), an SSP cooler, and an SSP deep sump. I chose to retain the OEM clutch packs and fill with OEM Diaqueen fluid.

I am very pleased with the work done by WORKS Motorsports but disappointed in their lack of timeliness and misinformation during the repairs, no way should this have taken over three months to complete!

While the SST was out I had them install a BBX turbo and AEM "Widemouth" DP and I asked for a conservative 91 octane tune; the car runs great! Spikes at 28 psi and holds 25 psi to 7500 rpms, it "only" made 348 hp on WORKS dyno but it feels every bit as fast as my 370 hp (different dyno) E85 tune on the stock turbo ! Launch control works perfectly as before and I have little doubt it will run low 12's as it sits and high 11's with an E85 tune, time will tell.

The BBX does feel sluggish compared to the stock turbo at part throttle (tip in) below 3000 rpm's but this is no biggie, it does not affect racing and and if in sport/auto mode it's only noticeable when making a standing start; changed right foot technique solves this problem is only noticeable when making a standing start if and it can probably be tuned out. Also I am getting a bit poorer gas milage (I actually expected better milage) but this also can be tuned out I Hope.

For the last three months I have used the Honda S2000 as my DD and this car is no slouch in the "fun to drive" category but I had forgotten just how sweet the Evo X MR was! The Evo wins the "fun to drive" from the Honda no contest, the MR is the only car I have owned that has me inventing places to drive just for the fun of it when I am not busy.
So how much is it to replace the sst? Thats kind of freakin me out, since i just bought a MR.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2011 | 06:32 PM
  #19  
Departed's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: So-Cal
Originally Posted by evoibad
So how much is it to replace the sst? Thats kind of freakin me out, since i just bought a MR.
One BBBBIIIIILLLIIIOOONNN DOLLARS!
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2011 | 07:38 PM
  #20  
kmart888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Burbank CA
Originally Posted by evoibad
So how much is it to replace the sst? Thats kind of freakin me out, since i just bought a MR.
If you have to ask...
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2011 | 07:45 PM
  #21  
migs647's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,043
Likes: 62
From: Portland
Brand new? You can get one for about $8k, + $2k installation, about $10k.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2011 | 09:23 PM
  #22  
Departed's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: So-Cal
Originally Posted by kmart888
If you have to ask...
How much for a ZJ?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2011 | 09:02 PM
  #23  
gunzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
Originally Posted by migs647
While I don't discount what he's saying, I haven't seen too many complaints about this sensor yet. Totally possible though. Hope you get it figured out soon.
Since I posted this info in the other forum .. might as get the word out .. P1808 only happens so far in Willall oil SSTs .. the SENSOR is embedded in the ECU chip itself and not a separate sensor as CLAIMED by Martin Donnon ..

HE is LUCKY alot of these guys just want to get back into their cars and get on with life ..

TIPPY Yours was the 1st publicly posted issue noticed by getrag .. YES .. they are also curious about this wonder oil that is better than their multimillion testing on their selected choice ..

The crappy blue oil failed alot of the factory tests .. this was the results sent to me.. This is a truncated message which basically confirms what alot of us FELT when 1st using the oil .. the rest was too technical and I had to consult engineering to figure out what they said

we made some test with the new oil which is mineral oil based (because it is much cheaper than the current one, which is 100% synthetic). The viscosity is about 15% less at 100°C than the current stock oil and 10% higher viscosity at -30°C. For the clutch, this oil behaves better, also efficiency is better for the whole trans, but:
Hydraulic leakage is worse under hot conditions, can affect some diagnostics causing timing problems ie , shifting , engagements, pressure spikes ..
My own testing (by Oil Additive company) confirms the oil breakdown at 100C
worst still was a few other things found in my gearbox oil sample that puzzled the tester ..

BRAND new oil was found with sediments that indicated poor refinement process ..
Oil has too large a variation in stability when temperature is increased to 100C
Gearbox oil had traces of water in it (had my previous diaqueen tested too and nothing bad was reported)
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 10:14 AM
  #24  
Widoww's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Ouch..but good to know failure due to aftermarket fluids so far only ..
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 04:09 PM
  #25  
kmart888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Burbank CA
Originally Posted by gunzo
..... the rest was too technical and I had to consult engineering to figure out what they said ...
Now I am confused, which oil is mineral based? Except for Geromy's public fupah SSP and Willall have stated that their oil (including the new Pro Gold) is 100% synthetic based. Who is fibbing?

A local dealer, who shall remain nameless unless he tells me he wants to get involved in this brouhaha, (bad for business) , has several SST’s with temp sensor failure using aftermarket fluid (not necessarily Willall), MMSA has refused to replace on warrantee thus far. He has not seen this type of failure on SST’s running OEM…yet.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 04:15 PM
  #26  
kmart888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Burbank CA
Originally Posted by gunzo
TIPPY Yours was the 1st publicly posted issue noticed by getrag .. YES .. they are also curious about this wonder oil that is better than their multimillion testing on their selected choice ..
The first? how about my several post? Oh I guess I did not emphasize the fluid I was using enough, there I go being a nice guy again. Away with you DR Jeckle! No more Mr nice guy!

Last edited by kmart888; Jan 7, 2011 at 09:04 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 08:00 PM
  #27  
gunzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
Originally Posted by kmart888
The first? how by my several post? Oh I guess I did not emphasize the fluid I was using enough, there I go being a nice guy again. Away with you DR Jeckle! No more Mr nice guy!


Well.. your post came after Tippy .. and my emails went out before Tippy .. I was directed to Tippy's post also .. at that point .. I experienced 5 cases already .. subsequently .. it went up to 9 .. then tippy and you joined in the fray .. currently .. the toll (KNOWN) stands at 19 .. SAME thing with the SAME oil ..

Even a kid can put 2 and 2 together ..

As for the mineral base oil .. well .. I can only infer that Getrag meant the BASE STOCK oil was mineral .. so in EFFECT its a SEMI SYN instead of FULLY SYN ??

I wouldn't say who is fibbing .. I can only claim one guy has vested interest in telling half truths ??..
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 09:08 PM
  #28  
kmart888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Burbank CA
Originally Posted by gunzo


Well.. your post came after Tippy .. and my emails went out before Tippy .. I was directed to Tippy's post also .. at that point .. I experienced 5 cases already .. subsequently .. it went up to 9 .. then tippy and you joined in the fray .. currently .. the toll (KNOWN) stands at 19 .. SAME thing with the SAME oil ..

Even a kid can put 2 and 2 together ..

As for the mineral base oil .. well .. I can only infer that Getrag meant the BASE STOCK oil was mineral .. so in EFFECT its a SEMI SYN instead of FULLY SYN ??

I wouldn't say who is fibbing .. I can only claim one guy has vested interest in telling half truths ??..
Wow 9, all with aftermaket fluid?

I read "first" as "only", sorry. I missed my afternoon nap

Last edited by kmart888; Jan 7, 2011 at 11:42 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011 | 12:34 PM
  #29  
Turvo's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Originally Posted by Tippy
Where you using LC?
If you hold the revs high in LC for more than a few seconds it will tell you to slow down and put you in limp for a short time. It maybe this.
I had this problem one morning. I started my car, letting it warm up, not even moved it out of park and it told me to slow down
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2011 | 03:16 AM
  #30  
kmart888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Burbank CA
retract

Last edited by kmart888; Feb 13, 2011 at 11:04 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tray@Forged
EvoX 'For Sale' Engine Internals and Drivetrain
93
Dec 8, 2011 09:48 AM
Tippy
Mitsubishi TC-SST Discussion
15
Sep 15, 2010 08:19 AM
Darwinn
ECU Flash
2
Mar 21, 2009 07:11 AM
desperado-c
Mitsubishi TC-SST Discussion
18
Aug 11, 2008 09:48 AM
dklau33
Mitsubishi TC-SST Discussion
39
Nov 26, 2007 05:20 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:05 AM.