Notices
Northwest Region Includes AK, ID, WY, SD, MT, ND, CO.

650WHP on E85 and Meth!!! at 36lbs of Boost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 03:22 PM
  #31  
Paul Nelson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,249
Likes: 0
From: Team English Racing
Here is the video link might take a min i just uploaded it to youtube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLtbaxoMu9s

Last edited by Paul Nelson; Feb 19, 2007 at 06:18 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 08:50 PM
  #32  
Borti's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
The video is still not working. Youtube has lost control.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 05:48 AM
  #33  
Paul Nelson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,249
Likes: 0
From: Team English Racing
back up
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 09:02 PM
  #34  
EVOGOD21's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: valhalla
nice horse power # what's with the torque???????
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 09:04 PM
  #35  
EVOGOD21's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: valhalla
...........................
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 02:25 PM
  #36  
HPF Kyle's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: PortlanD Oregon
Good stuff paul, was good to see you car! Burnt my eyes :P
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 05:27 PM
  #37  
Lucas English's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 793
Likes: 10
From: Camas, WA
You can read the dyno chart on the 1st page if you want to see what TQ is.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 08:35 PM
  #38  
LimPShoT's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Originally Posted by EVOGOD21
nice horse power # what's with the torque???????
Remember cesar demands that extra torque to move that frame of his
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 08:38 PM
  #39  
Paul Nelson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,249
Likes: 0
From: Team English Racing
Originally Posted by LimPShoT
Remember cesar demands that extra torque to move that frame of his
LOL
Burrito
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 08:49 PM
  #40  
EVOGOD21's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: valhalla
what I was saying is why the torque is so low???
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 09:34 PM
  #41  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by EVOGOD21
what I was saying is why the torque is so low???
While I understand what your asking, the torque is not "low" its still 483 ft lbs at the wheels. This is equivalent to a very healthy big block chevy. It is "low" as in lower than the horsepower by a good deal because of the nature of the build. A motor with a DBB t67 and cams that move the powerband up past 8K will naturally make less torque overall than one with a smaller turbo and similar boost cammed/engineered to make power at 6500/7000.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 09:03 AM
  #42  
Lucas English's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 793
Likes: 10
From: Camas, WA
For the size turbo I feel it spools very well and once you are in the power band it stays there very nice. The car is over 600hp from 6.5k-9k wich is not much different than 2.3 with tq and the power band from 5k-8k. The main reason for staying 2.0 is we are going to be over 9k through the traps and maybe even 10k later on so doing a 2.3 or 2.4 with good TQ would not last near as long as a 2.0 reving that high. If the EVO had different gearing doing a 2.3 would be nice.

If people are right about the BC cams than playing with cam timing should get us over 500tq.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 07:44 PM
  #43  
EVOGOD21's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: valhalla
Originally Posted by Lucas English
For the size turbo I feel it spools very well and once you are in the power band it stays there very nice. The car is over 600hp from 6.5k-9k wich is not much different than 2.3 with tq and the power band from 5k-8k. The main reason for staying 2.0 is we are going to be over 9k through the traps and maybe even 10k later on so doing a 2.3 or 2.4 with good TQ would not last near as long as a 2.0 reving that high. If the EVO had different gearing doing a 2.3 would be nice.

If people are right about the BC cams than playing with cam timing should get us over 500tq.
Cool! That ansewrs my question. Looks like you guy did a very good job on PAULina's car can wait to see it on the track, you should drive it Lucas!
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 08:06 PM
  #44  
FlyNavy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Oak Harbor, WA
Awesome stuff. Can't wait to get the meth/92 tuned on my tiny little GT35r/2.4! Wish we had E85 in my neighborhood.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 08:09 PM
  #45  
str8kor's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
wow, that insane boost, duel wastegate, that car will tear it up.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:46 AM.