EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/)
-   Evo Dyno Tuning / Results (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-dyno-tuning-results-299/)
-   -   572whp 30R LR2.4 Martin's Evo IX (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-dyno-tuning-results/594837-572whp-30r-lr2-4-martins-evo-ix.html)

wshihdnevo Jan 25, 2012 12:34 PM


Originally Posted by JohnBradley (Post 9916392)
I am going to investigate the turbine housing a little closer after lunch.

{thumbup}

gotboost247 Jan 25, 2012 12:43 PM

nice numbers

browningderek Jan 25, 2012 03:06 PM

ALL you need now is an HTA86. Turn it up to 40psi and you got a beast on your hands! IMO the HTA86 only spools a few hundred rpm slower than what you have so no real loss in lowend power but HUGE torque and high rpm power gains. If it were mine i would try the S3's With the HTA86. With the S2's it will make soo much torque its crazy.. It would be nice to calm down the midrange hit of mine in favor of more power from 7000-8500rpm. In fact, if you wanna sell those S3's let me know.......

kovs04sti Jan 25, 2012 03:23 PM

I wasn't aware a 2.3 can't rev as high as a 2.4? Doesn't seem to make sense

JohnBradley Jan 25, 2012 05:09 PM


Originally Posted by browningderek (Post 9916770)
ALL you need now is an HTA86. Turn it up to 40psi and you got a beast on your hands! IMO the HTA86 only spools a few hundred rpm slower than what you have so no real loss in lowend power but HUGE torque and high rpm power gains. If it were mine i would try the S3's With the HTA86. With the S2's it will make soo much torque its crazy.. It would be nice to calm down the midrange hit of mine in favor of more power from 7000-8500rpm. In fact, if you wanna sell those S3's let me know.......

They are Evo 9 S3s otherwise they would be yours, though I may have a set of Evo 8 inbound before too long. I agree a bigger turbo would make this combo exactly like mine was on the 3586 with slightly smaller camshafts.

JohnBradley Jan 25, 2012 05:10 PM


Originally Posted by kovs04sti (Post 9916800)
I wasn't aware a 2.3 can't rev as high as a 2.4? Doesn't seem to make sense

R/s ratio. A 2.3 can rev the same as a 2.4 since the the same 100mm stroke is in there. You can play with bearing clearances to make it happier, but the R/s gets you in the end. The increased sideloading besides being more friction is ultimately more wear and tear.

Aaron

uvambo Jan 25, 2012 07:44 PM

Its actually a funny thing my turbo of choice would have been the 3076HTA. So this works out good for me, i will end up sending this off to FP to have that conversion done.

One of my main goals with this car was to race it more(auto x/road race) so thats why i actually downgraded and left up to 50hp on the table going down from the S3's. And i have really no need for a 3586 super power levels for sure but not needed in my mind unless i was interested in drag racing or something.
Being that it is a 3076 makes it really on the high end of power levels with this turbo allready.
So im deff not done with this kit, im going to do some tweeks here and there and i would not be surprised for it to come close to 600.

Brianawd Jan 26, 2012 11:04 AM


Originally Posted by JohnBradley (Post 9916314)
ETS sent me this just now-



I agree with Brian for what it can do, but it should also spool faster than it is on a MIVEC 2.4 I would think. I realise its an HTA3076 I am going to compare, but Spencer spools at 4k with is on a 2.0L DSM.

Spool should be way faster on a 2.4 with MIVEC. I know I was seeing 30psi on the 3052 by 3600 rpm(2.0 in a galant vr4). Spencer can confirm as he has rode in the car on the street.

uvambo Jan 26, 2012 08:09 PM

^^ are you seeing this spool on the street with your car?

Aaron was saying this car is a different beast on the street and the graph spool issue might be because of typical Dynojet load control anomaly.

Lucas English Jan 27, 2012 10:50 AM

Just drove this car home last night. Look like if I load it hard in 5th it could get full boost around 2800rpm but the turbo will surge. I would say a low rpm 3rd roll is full boost in the mid to low 3k range.

She feels pretty good.

I also cut your BOV spring down so it will be smother in mid throttle then before.

uvambo Jan 27, 2012 09:05 PM

sounds good Lucas! This combo ended up working pretty sweet.

Ang Wen Yan Jan 31, 2012 10:59 PM

Very nice power for a GT3076
I think GT3076 HTA upgrade will do this car good,additional power without additional lag{thumbup}

udluz Feb 3, 2012 09:08 AM

I guess some combos just work!! *****en setup

wallyevolution Feb 17, 2012 07:26 PM

Nice numbers!!!............... I was gonna verify that it was a 3076R ball bearing turbo, but I can see that it already was....

Had I kept it, I definitely would have gone through English Racing

UVAMBO, shoot me a PM if you have any questions about the history of the vehicle.

uvambo Feb 17, 2012 09:45 PM

PM Sent Wally {thumbup}


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:31 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands