Cheap. Fast. Reliable. Pick two. (Evo IX Build)

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 12, 2010 | 12:52 AM

#16

evoIXcencal83

Evolving Member

iTrader: (4)

Joined: Jan 2008

Posts: 393

Likes: 0

From: California

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJsEvo8

^ I disagree. If you already have the head off to install cams, springs, retainers, etc., you might as well get the headstuds installed.

You dont need to remove the head for any of that.

Mar 12, 2010 | 04:55 AM

#17

tcturbo91

Newbie

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts: 24

Likes: 0

From: CT/NY/DE

i feel like these cars keep stock reliability as long as you get the right tune and dont beat it all day long

Mar 12, 2010 | 10:39 AM

#18

boostedwrx

Evolved Member

iTrader: (27)

Joined: Dec 2002

Posts: 5,034

Likes: 2

From: Seattle, WA

Speed Density is worth it and that thread posted on the first page, GST comes back and says theres gains on the last page. With the BBK and Speed Density your car will be a lot smoother plus gain 10-15whp.

Mar 12, 2010 | 11:22 AM

#19

4xforce

Evolved Member

iTrader: (25)

Joined: Jan 2007

Posts: 536

Likes: 1

From: norcal

Quote:

Originally Posted by boostedwrx

Looked long and hard but didn't find the thread that Bryan at GST mentioned some of the down falls of SD. When addressing the OP's first post I just wanted to mention that the SD MAY be the only thing to reconsider. If anyone else finds that thread it would be nice if they could post it or if someone else with extensive SD experience such as a knowledgeable tuner could comment. I am sure that for all out power SD definitely has an advantage. But is it for everyone especially when it's your DD?

Mar 12, 2010 | 11:35 AM

#20

golgo13

Thread Starter

EvoM Community Team

iTrader: (134)

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 3,619

Likes: 29

From: @ a track near you

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4xforce

You raise a very good point, so I asked:

Quote:

----- Original Message -----
From: Noah
To: Gregory Simpson
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: Dyno and Pricing Question

After doing more research on Evom.net, I'm beginning to wonder if I even need Speed Density with my modifications. What is your professional opinion?

----- Original Message -----
From: Gregory Simpson
To: Noah
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: Dyno and Pricing Question

Hey Noah,

Honestly we only really see the need to run Speed Density on large frame GT35 type turbo's where a 4" filter inlet flows more than a OEM MAF can support, I would personally think for your setup you would make the same power with the MAF as you would by switching to Speed Density.

Thanks,

Gregory Simpson - Sales
GST Motorsports
2439 Industrial Pkwy. West
Suite A
Hayward, CA 94545
510-264-9049
FAX 510-264-9740
www.gstmotorsports.com

I've decided not to run SD for the time being.

Apr 30, 2010 | 10:51 AM

#21

golgo13

Thread Starter

EvoM Community Team

iTrader: (134)

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 3,619

Likes: 29

From: @ a track near you

Updated the OP

Aug 17, 2011 | 05:45 PM

#22

golgo13

Thread Starter

EvoM Community Team

iTrader: (134)

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 3,619

Likes: 29

From: @ a track near you

Updated the OP

Am I missing any gaskets from that above list?

Aug 17, 2011 | 10:24 PM

#23

Laxman

Evolving Member

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Oct 2002

Posts: 480

Likes: 13

From: Tucson

Similar to my own setup, though I went a bit further. Mine has been super reliable and I'm at 60K with the stock clutch. However, fast and reliable has definitely not been close to cheap.

Aug 17, 2011 | 11:09 PM

#24

golgo13

Thread Starter

EvoM Community Team

iTrader: (134)

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 3,619

Likes: 29

From: @ a track near you

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laxman

Similar to my own setup, though I went a bit further. Mine has been super reliable and I'm at 60K with the stock clutch. However, fast and reliable has definitely not been close to cheap.

Post up your build.