Evo X power/torque limit - stock block/trans
Bakaunchi and Razorlab are just about the only E-tuners that I would trust with my personal car. They aren't mail-order though, you'll email them logs and they'll email you back tunes. The days of actually mailing your ECU somewhere to get bench-flashed are loooooooong gone.
The stock Evo X internals can hold over 450 HP and 400 TQ all day with no issues if properly tuned. Your complaining... that the internals from the factory....??? which already BONE stock make and maintain more HP PER LITER than any other car currently made.... You show me another PRODUCTION made car... even the Bugatti that has more I'll buy you lunch sir..
Please don't post a story about a buddy who, when drunk one day, claimed his new mustang made 1000 HP with a K@N and a Borla Exhaust...
It gets old when people expect the car to make 1000 HP from the showroom floor. If "almost" anyone blows their motor with a stage 2 and tune... its 99% of the time.. the tuners fault.
Please don't post a story about a buddy who, when drunk one day, claimed his new mustang made 1000 HP with a K@N and a Borla Exhaust...
It gets old when people expect the car to make 1000 HP from the showroom floor. If "almost" anyone blows their motor with a stage 2 and tune... its 99% of the time.. the tuners fault.
+1 ^agreed. The factory internals are very much capable of holding such power. Mitsu did a great job in reenforcing the block and creating coolant passages to keep overall temperatures down. The main flaw in the motor design is the rods and the rod bolts, however, 375-400wtq isn't a problem as long as the tune is solid. The 4B11 is a great design and deserves merit for its capabilities.
I've also seen a few dyno's reving beyond the factory 7000rpm redline. On a stock turbo there's not really a reason to do that since the power is tapering off anyway.
I remember reading in Kenne Bell's tech articles somewhere that every 1000 rpm is another 12% load on the rods. So reving out is exponentially more load, 12% + 12% etc. Keeping the revs to 7000 rpm max would buy you a little more margin of safety. Why rev out higher than stock unless there's a good reason to, aka larger turbo, cams, or built bottom end.
I remember reading in Kenne Bell's tech articles somewhere that every 1000 rpm is another 12% load on the rods. So reving out is exponentially more load, 12% + 12% etc. Keeping the revs to 7000 rpm max would buy you a little more margin of safety. Why rev out higher than stock unless there's a good reason to, aka larger turbo, cams, or built bottom end.
I've also seen a few dyno's reving beyond the factory 7000rpm redline. On a stock turbo there's not really a reason to do that since the power is tapering off anyway.
I remember reading in Kenne Bell's tech articles somewhere that every 1000 rpm is another 12% load on the rods. So reving out is exponentially more load, 12% + 12% etc. Keeping the revs to 7000 rpm max would buy you a little more margin of safety. Why rev out higher than stock unless there's a good reason to, aka larger turbo, cams, or built bottom end.
I remember reading in Kenne Bell's tech articles somewhere that every 1000 rpm is another 12% load on the rods. So reving out is exponentially more load, 12% + 12% etc. Keeping the revs to 7000 rpm max would buy you a little more margin of safety. Why rev out higher than stock unless there's a good reason to, aka larger turbo, cams, or built bottom end.
Bakaunchi and Razorlab are just about the only E-tuners that I would trust with my personal car. They aren't mail-order though, you'll email them logs and they'll email you back tunes. The days of actually mailing your ECU somewhere to get bench-flashed are loooooooong gone.
On my last couple of cars I stayed conservative with the RPM's and timing and that lead to many miles of abuse with almost double the stock whp on a stock motor without any problems. But everyone is different and treats their cars differently.
There is no flaw in their design. Every engine is going to have a weak point, but they're still capable of holding double the factory output. Very few engines can make that claim. Hell, some Subaru engines can't even hold their factory output.
This is kind of like how on the 8/9's the weak link in the drivetrain was the transfer case. Well, now with the X Mitsu has beefed up the transfer case and the rear differential is now the weak-link. No matter how strong you make everything there will always be something that's the weakest point.
We ask a lot of our engines, turbos, and drivetrains with how much power we push from them. Keep that in mind before claiming something is weak, and consider yourself lucky for having a car as beefy as the Evo.
This is kind of like how on the 8/9's the weak link in the drivetrain was the transfer case. Well, now with the X Mitsu has beefed up the transfer case and the rear differential is now the weak-link. No matter how strong you make everything there will always be something that's the weakest point.
We ask a lot of our engines, turbos, and drivetrains with how much power we push from them. Keep that in mind before claiming something is weak, and consider yourself lucky for having a car as beefy as the Evo.
Last edited by Kracka; Jan 22, 2013 at 06:12 AM.
Bakaunchi and Razorlab are just about the only E-tuners that I would trust with my personal car. They aren't mail-order though, you'll email them logs and they'll email you back tunes. The days of actually mailing your ECU somewhere to get bench-flashed are loooooooong gone.
Depending on ones setup the other guys on your list are good too, but for the serious setup (built motor) I'd feel better about Baka or Razorlab and prolly hollywood too. Built motors just need extra love, time and experience to get them purring from my experiences.
There is no flaw in their design. Every engine is going to have a weak point, but they're still capable of holding double the factory output. Very few engines can make that claim. Hell, some Subaru engines can't even hold their factory output.
This is kind of like how on the 8/9's the weak link in the drivetrain was the transfer case. Well, now with the X Mitsu has beefed up the transfer case and the rear differential is now the weak-link. No matter how strong you make everything there will always be something that's the weakest point.
We ask a lot of our engines, turbos, and drivetrains with how much power we push from them. Keep that in mind before claiming something is weak, and consider yourself lucky for having a car as beefy as the Evo.
This is kind of like how on the 8/9's the weak link in the drivetrain was the transfer case. Well, now with the X Mitsu has beefed up the transfer case and the rear differential is now the weak-link. No matter how strong you make everything there will always be something that's the weakest point.
We ask a lot of our engines, turbos, and drivetrains with how much power we push from them. Keep that in mind before claiming something is weak, and consider yourself lucky for having a car as beefy as the Evo.
You gotta pay to play people



