Notices

ROAD/RACE- Timing Control Box OFFICAL RELEASE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 06:34 AM
  #31  
lancer0220's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
put 3/4 93 and 1/4 regular

some mixture like that
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 08:17 AM
  #32  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
There is no wire slicing. Dyno waas done on a 2.0 liter also. Expect sometihng slightly better on the 2.4s. See the thread WHite GTS started.

ROAD/RACE
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 08:47 AM
  #33  
Gts_BlackJoker's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: New York
Okay , so that dyno was on done a STOCK 2.0L Lancer meaning it had just the timing control box

Correct? Or am I wrong?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 09:01 AM
  #34  
lancer0220's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by Gts_BlackJoker
Okay , so that dyno was on done a STOCK 2.0L Lancer meaning it had just the timing control box

Correct? Or am I wrong?


we need some clarification on this dyno because its saying 161hp base.

i dont think any STOCK 08 or 09 lancer puts down 161 to the wheels.

Clarification please!
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 11:44 AM
  #35  
4g94T's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
From: California
91 is the highest here. i dont know how they would tune for 93.

just use 93, it has a higher knock resistance than 91 so think of it as a safe guard for your engine
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 12:20 PM
  #36  
I Am God's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
From: The Salty, UT
Originally Posted by Gts_BlackJoker
Okay , so that dyno was on done a STOCK 2.0L Lancer meaning it had just the timing control box

Correct? Or am I wrong?
correct..
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 12:25 PM
  #37  
Infamous_pt4's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Canadia
Originally Posted by lancer0220
we need some clarification on this dyno because its saying 161hp base.

i dont think any STOCK 08 or 09 lancer puts down 161 to the wheels.

Clarification please!
that cant be the 2.0 its gotta be the 2.4 on the sheet, a stock 2.0 i have seen dyno'd at 125 to the wheels,what ever it was dynod on in the charts,either way it still is showing the hp increase,and for the price to get what you get seems pretty good
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 12:53 PM
  #38  
lancer0220's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by Infamous_pt4
that cant be the 2.0 its gotta be the 2.4 on the sheet, a stock 2.0 i have seen dyno'd at 125 to the wheels,what ever it was dynod on in the charts,either way it still is showing the hp increase,and for the price to get what you get seems pretty good


yes I can see it is still showing an HP increase but what good are these numbers when its saying stock to the wheels 161hp. yes i understand that the fact that the dynos base vs dyno with mod is the most important piece of information but can we trust these dyno numbers when the stock to the wheel # is way off. ?

im just asking the question for clarification im not saying anything bad about RRM I love their stuff my friends have I just think that the error on the charts should be clarified for everyones benefit.

but yes either way the gains do seem good and for the price its all good!

hopefully well get some clarification in the future if not then oh well i bet it works great as the other reviews have shown.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 01:09 PM
  #39  
AhFuJai's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, QC, Canada
im skeptical cuz the dyno seems too high for a stock lancer... i dont think we put that much to the wheels stock so imagine the 9 WHP gained would be alot smaller if it used another dyno that doesnt make the # look so high... it would be maybe 2whp? or 3 at MOST because people dynoed their lancer stock and it showed around 120 something...
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 06:30 PM
  #40  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
That is legit dyno. As for octane, we tune to 89-91 octane. Even with the tune you can run around with 87 if you have to but to get full advantage of the timing box, you would want to run 91 or better.

ROAD/RACE
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 07:27 PM
  #41  
brads09lancerGT's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: BC, Canada
Rock, this may be a dumb question, u said it is tuned to 89-91. So will u still get the 8 hp with 89 octane or will it be slightly less, like 5 or 6 hp. I would assume if u did use the regular gas u might see 2 or 3 hp if any. Thanks
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 07:25 AM
  #42  
chetman7's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: NEW York
imo the base numbers mean nothing.....its just there for a comparison.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 12:21 PM
  #43  
LuDa's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Originally Posted by AhFuJai
im skeptical cuz the dyno seems too high for a stock lancer... i dont think we put that much to the wheels stock so imagine the 9 WHP gained would be alot smaller if it used another dyno that doesnt make the # look so high... it would be maybe 2whp? or 3 at MOST because people dynoed their lancer stock and it showed around 120 something...
yeah its been stated in the other thread that the dyno is flawed somehow. i think ill wait for someone to personally dyno this with vid on a stock lancer...
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2009 | 09:46 PM
  #44  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Originally Posted by LuDa
yeah its been stated in the other thread that the dyno is flawed somehow. i think ill wait for someone to personally dyno this with vid on a stock lancer...
Stated this is flawed? I do not think so. This is a bone stock 2009 GTS, manual on a dynopac dyno and it is totally CORRECT. People just say something without knowing and people follow it. Can anyone say Sheeple?

ROAD/RACE
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2009 | 10:22 PM
  #45  
I Am God's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
From: The Salty, UT
Originally Posted by ROCK
Stated this is flawed? I do not think so. This is a bone stock 2009 GTS, manual on a dynopac dyno and it is totally CORRECT. People just say something without knowing and people follow it. Can anyone say Sheeple?

ROAD/RACE
looooool f*ckin DESTROYED!!!

\_ take a seat.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:34 AM.