Notices

STM Releases the new STM 650 cam shafts.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 05:56 PM
  #31  
lillev23's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
I think we need a test between these and a set of GSC S3s.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 01:00 PM
  #32  
LGshow19's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
Originally Posted by lillev23
I think we need a test between these and a set of GSC S3s.
I second this...Any insight Em with the 650s compared to S3s?
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2011 | 01:39 PM
  #33  
EmeryatSTM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (79)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 5
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by LGshow19
I second this...Any insight Em with the 650s compared to S3s?
Honestly, I have never tested or used the GSC's. I have no real reason to test them as ours work very well and we have not found the end of them yet.

-Em
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 04:37 PM
  #34  
RunThat's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
From: US
Just plain straight up ignored your question huh EvoDan? LOL! I want the answer to that question too.

nfo VS the br272 cam????? how much laggyer are these VS the br272 cam. i like my cams but if you and dave made some updates and that are acceptable then i want them. maybe a graph of each would be best???
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2011 | 11:25 AM
  #35  
thomas.featsent's Avatar
Newbie
15 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Central Texas
Looks like I am going to have to get my car dyno results to see if I can upgrade to these. Sounds like something I would be interested in. I have the forced performance cams right now. I have heard I am estimated around that area.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2011 | 07:40 AM
  #36  
05blue8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 843
Likes: 5
From: Austin, TX
I'll have results on these soon on my car vs Kelford 272's, I put down 657 on the Kelfords and .63 hotside HTA86. I swapped hotsides to the .82 but the car isn't waking up so could be the cams holding it back. They'll be going on very soon and then I'll be going back to the .63 to test that out with the cams also. Thank Tom at VR-Speed, he's a great tuner and is doing alot of this work on his own time to help out the community
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 07:59 AM
  #37  
ilikeppie's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, Colorado
Hey Em, I have been searching for some reviews on these cams has STM come up with any more comparisons? Any threads specifically that show reviews on these cams?
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 08:03 AM
  #38  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 7
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by evodan2004
info VS the br272 cam????? how much laggyer are these VS the br272 cam. i like my cams but if you and dave made some updates and that are acceptable then i want them. maybe a graph of each would be best???
Bump
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 08:09 AM
  #39  
B.J.@ToxicFab's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 1
From: Clinton, NJ - Myrtle Beach, SC
Originally Posted by evodan2004
Bump
You should get these & their new small front brake kit...weight reduction!!
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 08:20 AM
  #40  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 7
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by B.J.@ToxicFab
You should get these & their new small front brake kit...weight reduction!!
There brakes will do me no good on the street. I like them but there for 1320 only imo
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 12:23 PM
  #41  
EmeryatSTM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (79)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 5
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by evodan2004
info VS the br272 cam????? how much laggyer are these VS the br272 cam. i like my cams but if you and dave made some updates and that are acceptable then i want them. maybe a graph of each would be best???

Sorry, I do not have any real data to post with back to back runs on these cams VS anything. We have only had a few sets made and I am pretty sure every set has found a home in a 700 whp+ car. Basically, they work very well in the top end and if its spool you are looking for they are probably not the cam for you.

I would suggest them to anyone drag racing a 650 whp+ car that plans on staying over 6000 rpm's the whole way down the track.

-Em

Last edited by EmeryatSTM; Oct 10, 2011 at 03:49 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 01:52 PM
  #42  
Evosick2332's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 1
From: Illinois
I just picked up a set of the 650s from Emery a few weeks ago and this weekend went another 9.1@159.88MPH. Almost 4mph faster then the old Mivec head with also a slower 60ft time. Car has a 8 sec pass in her and going back this weekend Cams are awesome, im satisfied!
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 02:25 PM
  #43  
EmeryatSTM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (79)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 5
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by Evosick2332
I just picked up a set of the 650s from Emery a few weeks ago and this weekend went another 9.1@159.88MPH. Almost 4mph faster then the old Mivec head with also a slower 60ft time. Car has a 8 sec pass in her and going back this weekend Cams are awesome, im satisfied!

Thanks Joey! I am glad you are happy with them. If you have video of your car idling or racing feel free to post them here.

-Em
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 03:47 PM
  #44  
psphinx81's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 2
From: Buffalo, NY
Originally Posted by evodan2004
Bump
ill let you know but its going to have to wait till spring. im swapping my BF 272's for emerys cams
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2011 | 04:52 PM
  #45  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
I have tested them, more top end power just like Emery says. I agree with Emery on the HP and RPM requirements to run them.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:04 PM.