Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

Stage Zero+ comparison..

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 01:55 PM
  #1  
BOOSTEZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
Stage Zero+ comparison..

All:

Anyone have any Stage Zero dyno charts with cat that I can compare? I'm just wanting to know if I'm average or not.

Thanks,

-M
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 01:57 PM
  #2  
SterlingEvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,487
Likes: 0
From: StVa
Make sure they're on the same Dyno... your #s would be a lot higher on most other dynos... (eg. If you're at 244 on DD, then you'd be maybe 280 or something on dynojet...)
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 02:01 PM
  #3  
BOOSTEZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by SterlingEvo
Make sure they're on the same Dyno... your #s would be a lot higher on most other dynos... (eg. If you're at 244 on DD, then you'd be maybe 280 or something on dynojet...)
Right. It doesn't matter.. I just want to see some numbers.. Dynojet or DD.

-M
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 02:36 PM
  #4  
boostfed's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 632
Likes: 1
From: TN, near Nashville
here's a pic of my stage 0+. this was tuned at 17psi, because I had a mbc installed at the time and it was interferring with my Xede.




-Chad-
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 02:45 PM
  #5  
BOOSTEZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
Wow.. 13whp more? Did you have a cat? Is their DD calibrated the same as Shiv's? Or is it the 93 octane? Hmm... Can you post the AFR graph too?

-M
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 02:50 PM
  #6  
boostfed's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 632
Likes: 1
From: TN, near Nashville
that was tuned at dyno4mance. I'm pretty sure andrew and shiv have there dyno's calibrated as close as possible. that was catless on 93 with only 17psi falling to about 13-14psi.

here's the graph



-CHad-
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 03:03 PM
  #7  
BOOSTEZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
Ah, that makes sense then. Catless with 93 octane can definitely see the 13-20whp gain.

And actually your boost stayed pretty consistent during that run. You only fell slightly lower than 15psi at the upper rpms. Your car ran a lot leaner than mine too..

Cool! Anyone else?

-M

Last edited by BOOSTEZ; Apr 28, 2005 at 03:07 PM.
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 04:45 PM
  #8  
lowkey's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 1
From: Colleyville, TX
Originally Posted by BOOSTEZ
Cool! Anyone else?
Sure... Xede with WORKS 3" DP, HF CAT, IP and ABM (Axle Back Muffler).
Attached Thumbnails Stage Zero+ comparison..-dyno.jpg  
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 04:55 PM
  #9  
BOOSTEZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
What does the mustang dyno read in comparison to the DD? I see 293, but I don't know how to evaluate that. Was it on 93 octane?

-M
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 06:24 PM
  #10  
lowkey's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 1
From: Colleyville, TX
Originally Posted by BOOSTEZ
What does the mustang dyno read in comparison to the DD? I see 293, but I don't know how to evaluate that. Was it on 93 octane?
-M
Yes, 93. I know there is a conversion factor, but not what it is. On the day this dyno run was done, another car with similar mods made about the same. So, this is representative of a Stage Zero+ on a Mustang Dyno, I think.
Old Apr 29, 2005 | 03:49 AM
  #11  
tweekscratch's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: TX
That would be me. I have a megan racing down pipe, stock cat, custom 3" catback and an XEDE.

I laid down 291.6 @ 7000 RPM & 282.1 @ 4750.

The difference between lowkey's car and mine is the HF Cat. His torque shows up earlier. Otherwise our graphs are nearly identical.
Old Apr 29, 2005 | 08:43 AM
  #12  
boostfed's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 632
Likes: 1
From: TN, near Nashville
you can figure a 10-12% higher read out on a mustang compared to a dyno dynamics. basically take your DD number and multiply by 1.10-1.12 and that'll give you your number. for DD to dynojet it's about 12-15% higher.

my DD at 12% (260x1.12=291.2) is almost identical to the mustang numbers listed above.




-Chad-
Old Apr 29, 2005 | 01:24 PM
  #13  
BOOSTEZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by boostfed
you can figure a 10-12% higher read out on a mustang compared to a dyno dynamics. basically take your DD number and multiply by 1.10-1.12 and that'll give you your number. for DD to dynojet it's about 12-15% higher.

my DD at 12% (260x1.12=291.2) is almost identical to the mustang numbers listed above.




-Chad-
Gotcha.. so is there anyone that got a Stage Zero+ on 91octane? That seems to make a drastic difference actually.

-M
Old Apr 29, 2005 | 01:55 PM
  #14  
xchoirboy's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: cali
Just xflash no mods baseline was at 210 on 91oct

also clip

click me
Attached Thumbnails Stage Zero+ comparison..-vish1.jpeg  

Last edited by xchoirboy; Apr 29, 2005 at 02:00 PM.
Old Apr 29, 2005 | 07:51 PM
  #15  
BOOSTEZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by xchoirboy
Just xflash no mods baseline was at 210 on 91oct

also clip

click me
Yea, your running stronger than normal. I think Shiv says the baselines do like 190-200whp. Good results. I think I was probably around 220whp with just Xflash.

-M



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:26 AM.