Reading The Timing Value ?
Reading The Timing Value ?
Using commslog ....... and logging timing..... what does that value represent and how can you tell if you had a knock event that the ECU pulled timing for?
Here is a portion of one of my runs....This section reads all 118 but while in boost I see it go from 120-118. I just want to know how much of a change that really is.
TIME--RPM-TIMING
6.23,6776,118,
6.24,6792,118,
6.25,6792,118,
6.26,6804,118,
6.27,6830,118,
6.28,6830,118,
6.29,6850,118,
6.30,6857,118,
6.31,6857,118,
6.32,6877,118,
6.33,6877,118,
6.34,6884,118,
6.35,6884,118,
6.36,6903,118,
6.37,6918,118,
6.38,6939,118,
6.39,6958,118,
6.40,6958,118,
Here is a portion of one of my runs....This section reads all 118 but while in boost I see it go from 120-118. I just want to know how much of a change that really is.
TIME--RPM-TIMING
6.23,6776,118,
6.24,6792,118,
6.25,6792,118,
6.26,6804,118,
6.27,6830,118,
6.28,6830,118,
6.29,6850,118,
6.30,6857,118,
6.31,6857,118,
6.32,6877,118,
6.33,6877,118,
6.34,6884,118,
6.35,6884,118,
6.36,6903,118,
6.37,6918,118,
6.38,6939,118,
6.39,6958,118,
6.40,6958,118,
Originally Posted by donour
To translate to degrees, subtract 128.
118 -> -10 degrees
d
118 -> -10 degrees
d
On a 0-255 scale with 128 = 0deg, I would think that 118 corresponds to either -2deg (from the documentation about "double retard") or -1deg.
EDIT: ^^^ that's looking at the "timing offset" maps (e.g. SMART timing with +/- 12.7deg). In the regular timing map (typically setup as +/- 10deg), I think 118 would correspond to -1.56deg or -0.78deg.
Last edited by x99percent; Aug 15, 2005 at 10:16 AM.
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
see, shouldn't i have numbers like that on the pyxede log? or not?

d
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by x99percent
You sure about that?
On a 0-255 scale with 128 = 0deg, I would think that 118 corresponds to either -2deg (from the documentation about "double retard") or -1deg.
EDIT: ^^^ that's looking at the "timing offset" maps (e.g. SMART timing with +/- 12.7deg). In the regular timing map (typically setup as +/- 10deg), I think 118 would correspond to -1.56deg or -0.78deg.
On a 0-255 scale with 128 = 0deg, I would think that 118 corresponds to either -2deg (from the documentation about "double retard") or -1deg.
EDIT: ^^^ that's looking at the "timing offset" maps (e.g. SMART timing with +/- 12.7deg). In the regular timing map (typically setup as +/- 10deg), I think 118 would correspond to -1.56deg or -0.78deg.
" ("Crank timing out (tuned timing shift)","0 = -max?; 128 = 0?; 255 = +max?")"
d
Originally Posted by donour
Well this is taken directly from chiptorque documentation:
" ("Crank timing out (tuned timing shift)","0 = -max?; 128 = 0?; 255 = +max?")"
d
" ("Crank timing out (tuned timing shift)","0 = -max?; 128 = 0?; 255 = +max?")"
d

In the timing map, it's +/- 10 deg (but can be changed to +/- 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 10, 15, or 20 in pre-3.2 versions of XMap).
In the SMART timing map, it's +/- 12.7 deg.
Originally Posted by joeycoates
You might want to change your logg into a csv file, it goes to exel and is a LOT easier to work with!
Thanks to Sackett for this tip, it makes logging a lot easier....
I know this but the number would still be 118 and I have no idea what that refers to.
I doubt it means -10 because that would indicate heavy timing retard correct?
Originally Posted by x99percent
OK, and what is -max and +max? 

In the timing map, it's +/- 10 deg (but can be changed to +/- 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 10, 15, or 20 in pre-3.2 versions of XMap).
In the SMART timing map, it's +/- 12.7 deg.
In the SMART timing map, it's +/- 12.7 deg.

d
This still doesn't make sense to me......why would I see negative timing all the time?
Even at low RPM cruise?!?
2700 124 -4
2705 124 -4
2705 124 -4
2712 124 -4
2712 124 -4
2722 124 -4
2722 124 -4
2736 124 -4
2752 124 -4
2752 124 -4
2768 124 -4
2768 124 -4
2786 124 -4
Then at WOT
6523 120 -8
6545 120 -8
6559 120 -8
6588 120 -8
6595 120 -8
6604 119 -9
6620 119 -9
6620 119 -9
6641 119 -9
6646 119 -9
6655 119 -9
6655 119 -9
6655 119 -9
6663 119 -9
6671 119 -9
6671 119 -9
6690 119 -9
6723 118 -10
6734 118 -10
6750 118 -10
6753 118 -10
6776 118 -10
Even at low RPM cruise?!?
2700 124 -4
2705 124 -4
2705 124 -4
2712 124 -4
2712 124 -4
2722 124 -4
2722 124 -4
2736 124 -4
2752 124 -4
2752 124 -4
2768 124 -4
2768 124 -4
2786 124 -4
Then at WOT
6523 120 -8
6545 120 -8
6559 120 -8
6588 120 -8
6595 120 -8
6604 119 -9
6620 119 -9
6620 119 -9
6641 119 -9
6646 119 -9
6655 119 -9
6655 119 -9
6655 119 -9
6663 119 -9
6671 119 -9
6671 119 -9
6690 119 -9
6723 118 -10
6734 118 -10
6750 118 -10
6753 118 -10
6776 118 -10
Originally Posted by EVIL_EV0
This still doesn't make sense to me......why would I see negative timing all the time?
Even at low RPM cruise?!?
2700 124 -4
2705 124 -4
2705 124 -4
2712 124 -4
2712 124 -4
2722 124 -4
2722 124 -4
2736 124 -4
2752 124 -4
2752 124 -4
2768 124 -4
2768 124 -4
2786 124 -4
Then at WOT
6523 120 -8
6545 120 -8
6559 120 -8
6588 120 -8
6595 120 -8
6604 119 -9
6620 119 -9
6620 119 -9
6641 119 -9
6646 119 -9
6655 119 -9
6655 119 -9
6655 119 -9
6663 119 -9
6671 119 -9
6671 119 -9
6690 119 -9
6723 118 -10
6734 118 -10
6750 118 -10
6753 118 -10
6776 118 -10
Even at low RPM cruise?!?
2700 124 -4
2705 124 -4
2705 124 -4
2712 124 -4
2712 124 -4
2722 124 -4
2722 124 -4
2736 124 -4
2752 124 -4
2752 124 -4
2768 124 -4
2768 124 -4
2786 124 -4
Then at WOT
6523 120 -8
6545 120 -8
6559 120 -8
6588 120 -8
6595 120 -8
6604 119 -9
6620 119 -9
6620 119 -9
6641 119 -9
6646 119 -9
6655 119 -9
6655 119 -9
6655 119 -9
6663 119 -9
6671 119 -9
6671 119 -9
6690 119 -9
6723 118 -10
6734 118 -10
6750 118 -10
6753 118 -10
6776 118 -10
There is no "timing" signal. What you actually modify is the crank angle sensor. So to apply a postive timing value, you apply a negative value to the crank sensor. The ECU is fooled into thinking the crank is at a different location and then does its thing.
d
Originally Posted by donour
This is true, but those authority ranges are used for the Xede's internal programming to modify the signal. While these can be changed, the actual range of the signal must be fixed otherwise the ECU would get really confused. 

In XMap V3, try making a map that uses "timing change" and a range of +/- 1. Watch the graph as you hit Page Up or Page down on a cell in the map. I have to hit Page Up 7 times before the displayed value goes from "0.0" to "0.1", and another 13 times before it shows "0.2".
So, in the case of a +/- 1 deg map:
128 = 0
129 = 0.007874016
130 = 0.015748031
131 = 0.023622047
132 = 0.031496063
133 = 0.039370079
134 = 0.047244094
135 = 0.05511811 (shown as "0.1" due to rounding)
136 = 0.062992126
137 = 0.070866142
138 = 0.078740157
139 = 0.086614173
140 = 0.094488189
141 = 0.102362205
142 = 0.11023622
143 = 0.118110236
144 = 0.125984252
145 = 0.133858268
146 = 0.141732283
147 = 0.149606299
148 = 0.157480315 (shown as "0.2" due to rounding)
135 - 128 = 7
148 - 135 = 13
Originally Posted by donour
*sigh* I'm sure I'm going to get this wrong, but here goes.
There is no "timing" signal. What you actually modify is the crank angle sensor. So to apply a postive timing value, you apply a negative value to the crank sensor. The ECU is fooled into thinking the crank is at a different location and then does its thing.
d
There is no "timing" signal. What you actually modify is the crank angle sensor. So to apply a postive timing value, you apply a negative value to the crank sensor. The ECU is fooled into thinking the crank is at a different location and then does its thing.
d


