Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

Vischnu 3037 Turbo kit

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 05:58 AM
  #46  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
fwiw, i BELIEVE it has the .82 AR on the hotside and the 301 SS manifold.
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 06:13 AM
  #47  
Smogrunner's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,558
Likes: 1
From: Inland Empire, CA
This is my old dyno graph compared to IE Evo with his Vishnu stage 3 3037 kit vs a fully built 2.0 motor with a 35R:


Last edited by Smogrunner; Aug 31, 2005 at 06:22 AM.
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 07:48 AM
  #48  
Jaylenospoolboy's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Burbank
Smoggy,

Can you lay IE's run over the my runs 59 and 63 that I posted earlier in this thread?

Thanks!
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 08:19 AM
  #49  
Supernaut's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Into the Void
This only gets better by the post; I would have sworn someone like yourself would be making your own, much less asking what the difference is, with your merits and all. 301, 321 that would be the difference in strength, 301 not as strong as the 321.

COMMENTS REMOVED. CLEAN UP YOUR LANGAUGE OR TAKE A HIKE!

Speedlimit...

Last edited by Speedlimit; Aug 31, 2005 at 10:05 AM.
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 08:51 AM
  #50  
Ludikraut's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Originally Posted by Supernaut
Jesus Christ man does your neck hurt from sucking your own dick all day? Jesus I KNOW what 301 and 321 is, just wondering WHY AMS (IMHO the leader in Turbo kit quality and fitment) uses 301 Vs. Vishnu on 321. You know God damn fawking well it has nothing to do with the steel and you must look at the welds 1st. AMS has BY FAR the best welds I have ever seen and their “LOWELY” 301 SS has yet to fail.
AMS uses 304 SS thick wall tubular header.

The most likely reason AMS (and I'm guessing here) uses thick 304 SS is that it is "good enough" and it is both easier to work with and less expensive. The most likely reason Vishnu uses 321 (again taking an educated guess here) is that 321 is theoretically better suited for high temperature application such as exhaust manifolds, and if anything else, Shiv and Co. are probably even bigger perfectionists than AMS.

l8r)
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 08:59 AM
  #51  
Supernaut's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Into the Void
AMS uses 304 SS thick wall tubular header.

The most likely reason AMS (and I'm guessing here) uses thick 304 SS is that it is "good enough" and it is both easier to work with and less expensive. The most likely reason Vishnu uses 321 (again taking an educated guess here) is that 321 is theoretically better suited for high temperature application such as exhaust manifolds, and if anything else, Shiv and Co. are probably even bigger perfectionists than AMS.

l8r)
__________________

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-THANK YOU


Hey Smogrunner.


On that Dyno, I know which is the GT35R, but which is yours again?

Thanks, I believe you are running or ran the same kit as Evo_Chip?
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 09:16 AM
  #52  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
The green plot is the 3037 kit, come on now....

Scorke
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 09:17 AM
  #53  
Supernaut's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Into the Void
I know that, I was wondering whose the pink was, it looks stock but whose run and on what gas?

I'm assuming none fo these were on pump
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 09:20 AM
  #54  
LuxuryBroker's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Sunny Southern Cali !!!
the one making 370 and 356 is smog's
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 09:42 AM
  #55  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
YA, i believe thats his stock turbo chart.

evo_chip has the .82 ar hotside man.....
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 09:44 AM
  #56  
Supernaut's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Into the Void
Oh Ok thanks I thought he had the .63.
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 11:36 AM
  #57  
Dustin@Vishnu's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, Ca
If you want a pump gas monster, my recomendation would be a 3071 with 280 cams. The 3071 is a bit stronger on pump gas than the 3037. With that turbo, I think that 120 trap speeds would be doable on 93. As for 123....who knows.
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 11:46 AM
  #58  
Supernaut's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Into the Void
Kewl, I will keep that in mind.
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 12:48 AM
  #59  
xepyt's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: 310
Originally Posted by Dustin@Vishnu
If you want a pump gas monster, my recomendation would be a 3071 with 280 cams. The 3071 is a bit stronger on pump gas than the 3037. With that turbo, I think that 120 trap speeds would be doable on 93. As for 123....who knows.
How much power would a stage 2 w/ 264/272 cam set-up do against 280/280. I'm going stage 2 once your downpipes are in, but I was wondering if the step up to 280/280 would be worth it.
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 01:21 PM
  #60  
Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 7
From: On the track
Only if you plan on reving to 8k!
 




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:13 PM.