Dyno Tales: with and without XEDE
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Dyno Tales: with and without XEDE
Car has a dump-back exhaust running 91oct winter CA gas. First six consecutive dyno pulls shown. Running the Stage 0+ 91oct baseline XEDE map.
WHP and torque:
WHP and torque:
Originally posted by EVOtook
Shiv how come you say Winter gas? Is there a difference?
Shiv how come you say Winter gas? Is there a difference?
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/rfgecon.htm
http://www.epa.gov/region02/faq/refgas.htm
http://www.npradc.org/issues/fuels/s..._fuels_map.pdf
http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~landerso/98wa61a01.htm
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally posted by GokuSSj4
what was the base line on the stock car before the Xede ???
what was the base line on the stock car before the Xede ???
Regards,
shiv
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally posted by GokuSSj4
thanks , either way nice gains !!! I wonder how much more can you get with a custom tune out of it ...You think 255whp can be achieve ???
thanks , either way nice gains !!! I wonder how much more can you get with a custom tune out of it ...You think 255whp can be achieve ???
Shiv
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Re: Non 91
Originally posted by spicytuna
Shiv,
Any estimate on how 93 octane gas would favorably affect whp??
Shiv,
Any estimate on how 93 octane gas would favorably affect whp??
shiv
Re: Re: Non 91
Hey Shiv, when I was in there you told me that I should be using Union 76 fuel because it doesn't contain MTBE... I was told last night that since the first of the year all stations have to be MTBE free. Is this true? Are there any other reasons you recommend 76? It's not the official fuel of Nascar anymore!
-CJ
-CJ
I was wondering why cjbecks car with a dump back made only +10 peak power over the average stock evo's that you test (stk~196 to cjbecks~208)? I had read a post by you that a magazine article got +30 whp by just adding the same exhaust! I can understand car to car differences, but is cjbecks car on the weak side? Can you give some insight? Due to low boost? Otherwise, with the xede it looks pretty strong.
Last edited by Aby@MIL.SPEC; Jan 16, 2004 at 11:57 PM.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally posted by WOT
I was wondering why cjbecks car with a dump back made only +10 peak power over the average stock evo's that you test (stk~196 to cjbecks~208)? I had read a post by you that a magazine article got +30 whp by just adding the same exhaust! I can understand car to car differences, but is cjbecks car on the weak side? Can you give some insight? Due to low boost?
I was wondering why cjbecks car with a dump back made only +10 peak power over the average stock evo's that you test (stk~196 to cjbecks~208)? I had read a post by you that a magazine article got +30 whp by just adding the same exhaust! I can understand car to car differences, but is cjbecks car on the weak side? Can you give some insight? Due to low boost?
shiv


