CO vs. "regular" XEDE map
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
CO vs. "regular" XEDE map
Got a question ... what is the difference between the high altitude maps that are being run in Colorado vs. the regular maps off Vishnu's site? I just went from a custom tuned 91 Octane CO map to running the 93 Octane Stage 1 map. In doing so, I noticed that the new map seems to be running less boost than the CO map (~21psi vs. ~23psi). I just wanted to make sure that this is an expected behavior between the two maps...
On a separate note, I also installed an HKS panel filter into the stock airbox ... haven't dyno'd the car, but so far here's what I've found: AFR is ~+.3, and BOV (Greddy) is noticeably louder.
l8r)
On a separate note, I also installed an HKS panel filter into the stock airbox ... haven't dyno'd the car, but so far here's what I've found: AFR is ~+.3, and BOV (Greddy) is noticeably louder.
l8r)
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Nothing to worry about. It's not unusual to see higher boost with custom tunes. Especically when running an XEDEflash (as I believe you are) which raises you factory boost cut. The baselines maps on the website are on the conservative side.
Shiv
Shiv