Speed Density 2.0 (3D VE Tables, Baro)
#61
Evolving Member
damn time zones looks like we keep missing each other I'll try the new rom out later and email you over the roms and logs, thanks for the work on this by the way, just a quick question though i'm running this on a 2.3 i'm guessing it shouldn't make a difference but though I would let you know
#62
damn time zones looks like we keep missing each other I'll try the new rom out later and email you over the roms and logs, thanks for the work on this by the way, just a quick question though i'm running this on a 2.3 i'm guessing it shouldn't make a difference but though I would let you know
#63
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
RoadSpike, if you wanted a mirror for these ROMs (rather than relying on megaupload; I'm surprised you haven't heard a bunch of people saying "but it's blocked at work!" ), you could either attach them to a page on the wiki, or I could try to work out a low-effort way for you to publish them to the wiki's mirror area. Shoot me a PM if you think it'd be helpful at all.
Also, quick question: have you posted the source to your changes anywhere? It's a smaller audience that would be interested in that, but it's a whole lot easier to look at someone's commented source than it is to diff a couple of raw disassemblies to see what changed.
Also, quick question: have you posted the source to your changes anywhere? It's a smaller audience that would be interested in that, but it's a whole lot easier to look at someone's commented source than it is to diff a couple of raw disassemblies to see what changed.
#64
RoadSpike, if you wanted a mirror for these ROMs (rather than relying on megaupload; I'm surprised you haven't heard a bunch of people saying "but it's blocked at work!" ), you could either attach them to a page on the wiki, or I could try to work out a low-effort way for you to publish them to the wiki's mirror area. Shoot me a PM if you think it'd be helpful at all.
Also, quick question: have you posted the source to your changes anywhere? It's a smaller audience that would be interested in that, but it's a whole lot easier to look at someone's commented source than it is to diff a couple of raw disassemblies to see what changed.
Also, quick question: have you posted the source to your changes anywhere? It's a smaller audience that would be interested in that, but it's a whole lot easier to look at someone's commented source than it is to diff a couple of raw disassemblies to see what changed.
I always include the xml with the points where i'm creating a sub routine so disassemblers can see whats going on.
#65
Trying something a little new with the rom see if we can't get past the no start issue. Only change right now is really moving the sub routine to a new spot and getting out of the idea of trying to squeeze it into an existing space. 3e8b0 is the location i'm not including it in the xml this time since we are still trying to work out why this version with new axis's wont startup.
Moved the axis lookup to the beginning of the sub routine in the hopes that something about lookups interfered with r0 which is used in the calculation of the load. File is 7zipped just FYI.
Edit:
Some news think I figured out something that is probably causing the car to not run properly. The tables I defined were offset but 4 bytes so the value it was getting wasn't the one as shown. Will fix that and post up the new rom.
Moved the axis lookup to the beginning of the sub routine in the hopes that something about lookups interfered with r0 which is used in the calculation of the load. File is 7zipped just FYI.
Edit:
Some news think I figured out something that is probably causing the car to not run properly. The tables I defined were offset but 4 bytes so the value it was getting wasn't the one as shown. Will fix that and post up the new rom.
Last edited by RoadSpike; Feb 23, 2011 at 09:47 AM.