Hating on the RA's
Originally Posted by lrh35
AWD is something that the RA will never have. The RA will always have traction problems.
Not saying it's completely true, just what I've been reading, a possible AWD smaller turbo'd RA.
Originally Posted by tke_413
What if I told you there were rumors going around on the net about the RA becoming the new WRX?
Not saying it's completely true, just what I've been reading, a possible AWD smaller turbo'd RA.
Not saying it's completely true, just what I've been reading, a possible AWD smaller turbo'd RA.
I could see it happening, that would be Mitsu's next step with the lower model lancers.
id get an ra for a daily driver, i test drove one and id have to do some serious modding on it if it was my only car, im not hating on ra's they are decent little cars, but as stock its too slow and the suspension is too soft, not to mention i cant really stand the handling of an fr cars, but thats just my preference, but as a daily driver it wouldnt be a bad choice, decent gas mileage with decent acceleration, im not aware of the full potential as i have never seen a fully built one, but just like the evos ra guys have their loyalists and that is cool, granted a lot of evo guys are cocky and think their cars are the be all and end all of cars, and handed down from the gods, but they dont know any better. the evo i just a car, its not just any car but it is still just a car, that being said...i love mine but its still too slow.
Originally Posted by DiamondWhite
isn't that what the Evo RS is?
Problem tho..... I think Mitsu's too poor for this. Plus the next Lancer design is coming out in the next couple of years. Maybe in 2008? hahaha...maybe.....::sigh::
.... Why don't they Do like they did with the 2nd gen dsms?
Make the eclipse have a few versions
RS - no options
GSi - AWD Turbo'd 4g69
GT - V6 Bas
GTS - V6 Rear wheel drive...
Or something like that?
GTS VS. 350Z
GSi vs WRX
RS Vs Spec V
GT vs mustang V6... may sound stupid to you but I mean, those cars can have 100k and some people still pay 10k for it.
Make the eclipse have a few versions
RS - no options
GSi - AWD Turbo'd 4g69
GT - V6 Bas
GTS - V6 Rear wheel drive...
Or something like that?
GTS VS. 350Z
GSi vs WRX
RS Vs Spec V
GT vs mustang V6... may sound stupid to you but I mean, those cars can have 100k and some people still pay 10k for it.
Originally Posted by DiamondWhite
.... Why don't they Do like they did with the 2nd gen dsms?
Make the eclipse have a few versions
RS - no options
GSi - AWD Turbo'd 4g69
GT - V6 Bas
GTS - V6 Rear wheel drive...
Or something like that?
GTS VS. 350Z
GSi vs WRX
RS Vs Spec V
GT vs mustang V6... may sound stupid to you but I mean, those cars can have 100k and some people still pay 10k for it.
Make the eclipse have a few versions
RS - no options
GSi - AWD Turbo'd 4g69
GT - V6 Bas
GTS - V6 Rear wheel drive...
Or something like that?
GTS VS. 350Z
GSi vs WRX
RS Vs Spec V
GT vs mustang V6... may sound stupid to you but I mean, those cars can have 100k and some people still pay 10k for it.
Wayyyyyy too expensive to have a bunch of different drivetrains for one model. It would be cheaper to make all Lancers AWD than it would be to make only the RA AWD. At least that's what it sounded like you were saying. I don't think it will happen either.
Originally Posted by captain150
Wayyyyyy too expensive to have a bunch of different drivetrains for one model. It would be cheaper to make all Lancers AWD than it would be to make only the RA AWD. At least that's what it sounded like you were saying. I don't think it will happen either.
Originally Posted by tke_413
What if I told you there were rumors going around on the net about the RA becoming the new WRX?
Not saying it's completely true, just what I've been reading, a possible AWD smaller turbo'd RA.
Not saying it's completely true, just what I've been reading, a possible AWD smaller turbo'd RA.
Originally Posted by EVOL EDO
id get an ra for a daily driver, i test drove one and id have to do some serious modding on it if it was my only car, im not hating on ra's they are decent little cars, but as stock its too slow and the suspension is too soft, not to mention i cant really stand the handling of an fr cars, but thats just my preference, but as a daily driver it wouldnt be a bad choice, decent gas mileage with decent acceleration, im not aware of the full potential as i have never seen a fully built one, but just like the evos ra guys have their loyalists and that is cool, granted a lot of evo guys are cocky and think their cars are the be all and end all of cars, and handed down from the gods, but they dont know any better. the evo i just a car, its not just any car but it is still just a car, that being said...i love mine but its still too slow.


