Notices

battery help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2006 | 08:35 AM
  #16  
itsaneswhocares's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: oregon
nah it has 18 amp, but 247 cca

Last edited by itsaneswhocares; Dec 31, 2006 at 08:45 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2006 | 08:50 AM
  #17  
otter's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,624
Likes: 14
From: Seat 8A
Cool, keep us up to date when you make that tray.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2006 | 11:29 AM
  #18  
reTro's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by otter
Looks good, but I'm more looking at something that looks like it belongs there, and will let me completely eliminate the stock battery tray.
Am I missing something? I don't see a picture!

Anyway, I've been thinking about getting the Odyssey pc-680 if anyone comes up with a tray that will work in our cars.
http://www.odysseybatteries.com/battery/pc680.htm
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2006 | 11:37 AM
  #19  
Jeovannie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: FT. BRAGG
I little bit expensive but is light and looks good
Attached Thumbnails battery help-100_1384.jpg  
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2006 | 01:38 PM
  #20  
itsaneswhocares's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: oregon
hey retro , happy new year homes



30$ for this battery and its got the same specs as that mj680 battery, but more cca, 16 v 18 amp hour, 247 cca

i used the stock tray, because i was not sure this was going to work, so i didnt want dismantle everything just to put it back in.

its 13 lbs compared to 34 lbs stock, so thats 21 lbs off for 30$, WHAT????
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2006 | 04:46 PM
  #21  
chowetime's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
From: Western Australia
well that would have to be the smallest battery I have seen - not sure about your negitive battery connection though does not look all that secure...

Have a look in a motorbike shop they usually have very small batteries which are light weight and have high CCA - I think from memory we need 330CCA - I have just put an amp in my car and I am thinking that I should really start looking at a 500CCA...
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2006 | 04:55 PM
  #22  
itsaneswhocares's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: oregon
i would not recommend a light weight battery if your running a sound system, that pretty much defeats the purpose of a lightweight battery


the connection is secure, it just doesnt look that way from this pic.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2006 | 05:01 PM
  #23  
chowetime's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
From: Western Australia
Originally Posted by itsaneswhocares
i would not recommend a light weight battery if your running a sound system, that pretty much defeats the purpose of a lightweight battery

the connection is secure, it just doesnt look that way from this pic.
Why? what are the downside or consequinces to using a light weight sealed battery vs the traditional 3 times the size batteries ?


Thats fine like you said the pic does not show how secure it really is - little bit decieving to the eye
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2006 | 05:31 PM
  #24  
itsaneswhocares's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: oregon
i just dont think it has enough juice to power a bass booming sound system, i could be wrong.

the negative is, the battery wont last as long as your stock one? i dont really know any negatives besides that

it may not look secure but it is


Last edited by itsaneswhocares; Dec 31, 2006 at 05:35 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 01:57 AM
  #25  
Ryan_VRX06's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 566
Likes: 1
From: Perth, Western Australia
If wanting to lose the weight from the front is an issue - how hard is it to mount it in a battery box in the trunk (boot!!)
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 05:24 AM
  #26  
itsaneswhocares's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: oregon
its really about losing overall weight off the entire car. so moving the battery to the back is almost pointless...i said almost
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 09:03 PM
  #27  
reTro's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by itsaneswhocares
hey retro , happy new year homes
Thanks for the pics! Not bad... but I want a tray made to fit.


Originally Posted by chowetime
Why? what are the downside or consequinces to using a light weight sealed battery vs the traditional 3 times the size batteries?
Their downside is that they have a limited reserve. In other words, you can't sit and just listen to your car stereo with your engine off. Within prob 15min your battery would be dead. Also, if you live in a really cold climate you might have a prob with this type of battery as it will discharge faster than a full size one.

Obviously their big benefit is the weight savings. They are also a dry cell, thus sealed, and give a little more room to work with in the engine bay.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 10:13 PM
  #28  
otter's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,624
Likes: 14
From: Seat 8A
Not all of them are dry cell. Itsaneswhocare's battery is a lead acid battery.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hutch959
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
4
Dec 7, 2016 05:41 PM
347-dis
04-06 Ralliart General
9
Sep 15, 2014 02:05 PM
Lukelis
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
2
Jan 30, 2012 12:51 PM
Mr. PSSsSt
Evo General
5
Jul 9, 2009 07:56 PM
StreetSleeper8
Lancer Show / Shine
28
Nov 13, 2005 11:45 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:44 AM.