Notices

SOHC vs DOHC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 11:04 AM
  #1  
Realistic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Fort McMurray
SOHC vs DOHC

Hey guys, I know the Evo has a Dual while our RA's have a single.. What are some of the advantages of having a Single? When I talk to my buddy (drives a supra) he tells me that the supra is better simply because its a DOHC.

I know its a rookie question.. But any thoughts?

Edit:
Is it possible to drop a DOHC into our RAs ??

Last edited by Realistic; Apr 1, 2007 at 11:23 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 11:17 AM
  #2  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Cheaper to replace all the cams in the car?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 11:42 AM
  #3  
otter's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,624
Likes: 14
From: Seat 8A
There really isn't an advantage to SOHC, other than timing belt changes are easier ambystom01 is right, too, one shaft is cheaper than two, but not by much.

You could also argue that there's less weight for the engine to spin, but that's a pretty weak argument. DOHC really is the better option. Finally, no, you can't convert the RA to DOHC since there's not a DOHC head out there that'll work. Plus, it wouldn't be worth the cost, since most people wouldn't take advantage of the ability to independantly set the timing on the intake and exhaust lobes.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 01:18 PM
  #4  
Realistic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Fort McMurray
thanks otter. Someone mentioned dropping an Evo head.
whats the biggest advantage of DOHC?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 02:17 PM
  #5  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
It's more efficient since you have a separate cam for intake and exhaust. You can't swap an evo head in, completely different engine.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 10:50 PM
  #6  
reTro's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Don't you need DOHC to get 4 valves per cyl? I guess there a few SOHC with 24v, but I think it becomes more complicted. Also, DOHC can rev higher due to the valve/spring weights.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 11:28 PM
  #7  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
We have 4 valves per cylinder (we're 16v).
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 06:53 AM
  #8  
otter's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,624
Likes: 14
From: Seat 8A
24v is for 6 cyl cars. But yes, we definitely have 4 per cylinder. If you pull the valve cover off you can see how it all works.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2007 | 08:01 AM
  #9  
mkaresh's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by reTro
Don't you need DOHC to get 4 valves per cyl? I guess there a few SOHC with 24v, but I think it becomes more complicted. Also, DOHC can rev higher due to the valve/spring weights.
The advantage of SOHC is it's cheaper and makes for a more compact head.

Disadvantages:
--more complicated valvetrain, with lots of rockers and followers and such
--this means the engine cannot spin as high = lower redline
--can't have as wide an angle between the valves = less power from less spherical combustion chamber

Toyota had a DOHC two-valve engine for a while, I suppose for the third reason.

I think Honda had the first SOHC four-valve engine, in the first Legend. Since then Chrysler and Mitsubishi have also adopted the design, Chrysler only with the 3.5.

Honda appears to be the only company committed to SOHC four-valve engines, and its high performance engines remain DOHC.
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:08 PM.