Is ralliart underated?
#19
Evolved Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Probably not a good comparison, but I was driving around in my parents' Malibu, and it's got the 3.1 V6, 170 hp.... and it couldn't even hold a candle to the way my RA opens up speed...I mean, family car vs. sport compact is not a good comparison (gearing, etc...), but it goes to show you how well a job they did with this motor.
Oh...and I took my friend for a spin in the car, he was shocked when I told him it was an inline 4....he swore it was a V6.
Oh...and I took my friend for a spin in the car, he was shocked when I told him it was an inline 4....he swore it was a V6.
#23
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by thereasonsf3
WTF RRM has a dyno. um where the hell are the dyno'ed turbo's???????
WTF RRM has a dyno. um where the hell are the dyno'ed turbo's???????
#26
Evolved Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: TB, FL
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GM's 3.1L isn't that good for power, underwhelming.
GM didn't spice up the motor until the 3.4l in the Z34. It didn't take too long before th 3.8L in the Grand PRix GT, not the SC version.
http://www.geocities.com/luminaz34page/
GM didn't spice up the motor until the 3.4l in the Z34. It didn't take too long before th 3.8L in the Grand PRix GT, not the SC version.
http://www.geocities.com/luminaz34page/