Notices

Mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2004, 10:21 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Marioben2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mpg

Can anyone tell me if adding the RRM Piggyback ECU will hurt my gas milage alot if at all?
Old Jun 25, 2004, 10:51 AM
  #2  
EvoM Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
otter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Seat 8A
Posts: 8,624
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Don't know what it'll do to your gas milage, but it will force you to start using 91+ octane fuel, so that will cost more.
Old Jun 25, 2004, 12:43 PM
  #3  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (26)
 
Boeturbolancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hemet, CA
Posts: 2,791
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Won't hurt your mpg at all. You should actually be getting better gas mileage when stomping on it as it isn't as rich as before. For the most part if your just cruising around you should get the same mpg as stock.
Old Jun 25, 2004, 07:00 PM
  #4  
Evolving Member
 
Jesse00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the mpg will stay roughly the same but your monthly gas money will increase due to pas prices (raising and droping all the time) and your now using 91 octane instead of that 85 octane before... But better performance, who cares bout that little money huh?
Old Jun 26, 2004, 12:10 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
 
lrh35's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chesterfield, MO
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I always use 91 octane anyway. I can drive further on a tank of gas and fill up less often and that saves me money in the long run.
Old Jun 26, 2004, 03:26 PM
  #6  
EvoM Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
otter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Seat 8A
Posts: 8,624
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by lrh35
I always use 91 octane anyway. I can drive further on a tank of gas and fill up less often and that saves me money in the long run.
It makes little to no sense to run 91 octane fuel in an engine that only needs 87 octane. You're just throwing money away. Higher octane fuels have higher flashpoints, so they're necessary in higher compression engines, and engines tuned for significantly greater than stock performance, but is completely unneeded in the stock engine.

If running higher octane actually gave you better gas milage, as you think it does, then all manufacturers would say their car requires it so they could put the slightly better MPG number on the sticker.

Last edited by otter; Jun 26, 2004 at 03:30 PM.
Old Jun 26, 2004, 08:48 PM
  #7  
Evolved Member
 
lrh35's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chesterfield, MO
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
run your car both ways for a couple weeks and check your mileage and see. thats what I did and it works.
Old Jun 27, 2004, 03:24 AM
  #8  
Evolving Member
 
Jesse00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by otter
It makes little to no sense to run 91 octane fuel in an engine that only needs 87 octane. You're just throwing money away. Higher octane fuels have higher flashpoints, so they're necessary in higher compression engines, and engines tuned for significantly greater than stock performance, but is completely unneeded in the stock engine.

If running higher octane actually gave you better gas milage, as you think it does, then all manufacturers would say their car requires it so they could put the slightly better MPG number on the sticker.
Otter, we are talking about changing the ECU of the Lancer from the stock to RRM Piggyback ECU. That ECU changed all the fuel/air ratio and all that and so it requires higher octane of fuel. Higher octane just means higher combustion rate, not necessary for higher compression. I can have RRM Piggyback which runs in 91octane and with a turbo and use low compression engine. You are partly right because you are talking about a brand new never-been-touch car.

We are talking about changing the ECU of the Ralliart to make it better performance. But you are correct again about the mileage vs. gas. You won't change the mileage vs. gas if you change the octane. They set it to 91 because they programmed it to have higher combustion rates, you need better gas. Using higher/lower octane than the manufacturer recommendation will only cause harm to your engine. So if you run stock engine with stock ECU, use 87. For cars with RRM Piggyback ECU, use 91.
Old Jun 27, 2004, 06:13 PM
  #9  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
xstephenx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They did not change any combustion rates. Combustion rate of fuel is a property of the components of that fuel. They most likely advanced the timing and thus would need higher octane to prevent pre-ignition (knock). And otter is completely correct, the higher the octane the higher the flash point, which means you can compress the vapor to much higher pressures without having it heat up enough to ignite from the increased pressure, as opposed to igniting off of the ignition source (spark).




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:08 AM.