Notices
09+ Lancer Ralliart General Discuss any generalized technical factory turbocharged Ralliart related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

CarandDriver stats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2008 | 01:22 PM
  #31  
DRAGHICI's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 970
Likes: 42
From: Here
wow almost as fast as a X, wow
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2008 | 06:17 PM
  #32  
dboz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
From: ohio
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
so the RA will be perfect for you.
If you dont "want " the X, that doesn't mean you can call it like that.
Yours will be then the 30K econobox?
Since your price will be a lot closer to $30K then mine for the $40k...
Not dissing the X at all. Just saying to me for the SST I do not want to go 40k. At that price point there are MANY cars in the want list. My point was that to get the trans at 27-30 is a deal even though you give up the other edgy aspects of the X. If I could have my cake and eat it too, I would get the MR but I just can't justify the price for a daily driver.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2008 | 09:33 PM
  #33  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by dboz
Not dissing the X at all. Just saying to me for the SST I do not want to go 40k. At that price point there are MANY cars in the want list. My point was that to get the trans at 27-30 is a deal even though you give up the other edgy aspects of the X. If I could have my cake and eat it too, I would get the MR but I just can't justify the price for a daily driver.
I think most RA will be just as fast as the factory evo eventually. After little hook ups.
So i dont see any draw back on that part. The big draw back will be the handling and the car attitude.
And you will miss that one for sure. But for dd. The Ra will be a better choice , if its not an MR.
Straight speed , you will be there easy i think.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 11:27 AM
  #34  
100$ GUY's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Costa Rica
Originally Posted by eddie
nope. these things suck gas. I've heard some people will see 24-25mpg highway but not much more. If you want mileage your in the wrong forum.
Car is not even out and you are already hearing people....... talking about specific MPG numbers...... HOW SO???

Yeah the ralliart will suck gas, but officially is more fuel-efficient than the EVO.
Gotta talk about comparable numbers, cause actual mileage will vary.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 11:29 AM
  #35  
100$ GUY's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Costa Rica
Originally Posted by eddie
Very true but take into consideration a lot of buyers eying that GSR or TSST equipped MR cannot initially come up with the coin to buy one. Which is why they may settle for the next best thing (Ralliart), adding modifications down the road as their bank account allows.
Now, I can imagine that for the majority of potential Ralliart buyers, going the full spec. coilover and BBK route will probably be cost prohibitive. Not to mention that most of these cars will not set a wheel on a track, in which case going the full monty with coilvers and BBK's is pretty much overkill.
Most owners will settle on a nice set of springs/wheels/tires and some of your more typical drivetrain modifications. And that's fine.
I think what Robispec is trying to showcase is the potential for this car if taken to the next level. And in retrospect, that 'next level' is pretty freakin' high.
Until now, seeing what a simple chip has done in power to the EVO X, well....looking forward big time for a similar chip to the RA. Easiest mod, huge gains, huge value, too little cost.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 11:32 AM
  #36  
100$ GUY's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Costa Rica
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
I think most RA will be just as fast as the factory evo eventually. After little hook ups.
So i dont see any draw back on that part. The big draw back will be the handling and the car attitude.
And you will miss that one for sure. But for dd. The Ra will be a better choice , if its not an MR.
Straight speed , you will be there easy i think.
EVO is in another league, and I appreciate that !!
U get what u want and what u pay for.
We know the cost/benefits of both cars, and both will give their owners big smiles.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #37  
RS-0's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: pdx
I saw mpg figures set at 17/25 per Yahoo Autos. Only 4 mpg off VW GTI DSG figures, which is not bad considering awd and no direct injection. I'm sure 22 will be average with the "I got 30mpg on a xxx mile trip..."
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2008 | 07:02 PM
  #38  
hibby's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by RS-0
I saw mpg figures set at 17/25 per Yahoo Autos.
That's the official EPA rating.

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rotterdam
Outlander Sport
16
Mar 18, 2017 06:30 AM
moparfan
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner
3
Mar 17, 2017 05:51 PM
Pal215
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner
5
Sep 29, 2016 09:15 PM
CottageLifer
Outlander Sport
2
Mar 26, 2016 08:22 AM
fromWRXtoEVO
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner
46
Aug 20, 2008 07:34 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:17 AM.