Notices
09+ Lancer Ralliart General Discuss any generalized technical factory turbocharged Ralliart related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

Zchip vs ecu flash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 04:11 AM
  #16  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
the Z-chip is basically a piggy back. stimulate the ecu. The ecuteck is rewrite the ECU.
Ecuteck is a better product, in my an many others opinion. The Ecuteck started in 2000.
The Z-chip can be even older, but i didnt even hear anything about them before 2008.

Also i never heard anyone who warranty got denyed because the Ecuteck reflash.
Also Ecuteck is works with big names . Not just local tuners. Like race teams , Ralliart UK. HKS etc.

Your choice. The ecuteck is not much more expensive then the Z-chip when you actually done. One guy here paid in this RA forum $700. when he was finished. The ecuteck is around in the first time $800. But in that $800, you pay $450 for license fee for Ecuteck, after that that license is your forever . So the next tune is around $200-$300.

I hope it helped.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 07:48 AM
  #17  
Euripides's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Canada
Pretty much the Z chip tricks the MAP to give more power/torque, that's why a intake would be a issue, and that's why there's a limit to the torque, damn American prices, thats pretty cheap for the ecutek tune haha
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 12:39 PM
  #18  
Chris@AMS's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: West Chicago, IL
I use ECUTeK on the Ralliarts we tune here... It works great!
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 01:03 PM
  #19  
projectevo9's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by desperado-c
Even if you flash the ECU, you still have the TCU to contend with regarding max torque, don't you?
This is true so does it matter what tunning tool you use? You can upgrade all you want but your max tq is always gonna be in the 260-270 range.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 01:04 PM
  #20  
captg's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by projectevo9
This is true so does it matter what tunning tool you use? You can upgrade all you want but your max tq is always gonna be in the 260-270 range.
Where are you getting your numbers?
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 01:28 PM
  #21  
projectevo9's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by captg
Where are you getting your numbers?
Correction 265 max tq by Scott @ TTP here is the full story
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/20...iart-4b11.html
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 01:41 PM
  #22  
madcows's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Originally Posted by projectevo9
Correction 265 max tq by Scott @ TTP here is the full story
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/20...iart-4b11.html


I believe AMS or GST just recently tuned a ralliart beyond that power, and didn't have an issue with the SST.

Edit: It was AMS... They got a nice additional chunk of power without running into the "torque limit"
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/20...no-inside.html

Last edited by madcows; Jan 26, 2009 at 01:53 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 02:08 PM
  #23  
Euripides's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Canada
265 is not the max for the SST trans, 265 max tq is the max if you use Z chip to tune your car, because its a piggyback style mod, that relies on tricking the ECU by altering the Map sensor, Z-chip doesnt reflash or do any of that kind of stuff to the ECU, how do you think the Evo X can obtain higher Tq values, and AMS also obtains higher TQ,
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 02:57 PM
  #24  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
265 wtq can make for a very quick daily driver, I have about that and it can be a real handful at times. On the way home Saturday evening I accidentally broke traction with all four wheels on dry pavement simply because I hit what I presume was a patch of ice.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 03:07 PM
  #25  
GiLizILL's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
From: Ramstein Ab
Originally Posted by Euripides
265 is not the max for the SST trans, 265 max tq is the max if you use Z chip to tune your car, because its a piggyback style mod, that relies on tricking the ECU by altering the Map sensor, Z-chip doesnt reflash or do any of that kind of stuff to the ECU, how do you think the Evo X can obtain higher Tq values, and AMS also obtains higher TQ,

wrong...my car was tuned at 285 WTQ...then scott gave it a more mild tune to 265 due to the torque protection
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 03:30 PM
  #26  
Euripides's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Canada
So yeah if he put it down to 265 tq then yeah thats the max that Z chip can go without having tranny issues or without worrying abt damaging anything...same crap just saying it differently, if you want me to be more exact, the here it is.. 265 TORQUE IS THE MAX THAT Z CHIP SHOULD PUT OUT WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES OR DAMAGING THE TRANNY, OR TRANNY SLIPPING... if im wrong then put it back at 285 see what happens
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 03:34 PM
  #27  
GiLizILL's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
From: Ramstein Ab
how about you get all the AMS parts with a tune and flash above 270WTQ and see what happens/. you have to remember all the MR's have these tranny issues too.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 03:45 PM
  #28  
jRox's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 1
From: Union, NJ
Originally Posted by madcows
I believe AMS or GST just recently tuned a ralliart beyond that power, and didn't have an issue with the SST.

Edit: It was AMS... They got a nice additional chunk of power without running into the "torque limit"
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/20...no-inside.html
I don't think AMS even hit the claimed 'torque limit of 265 wtq'

Although AMS does believe the torque limit is speculation, we can't really say whether it is or not until AMS themselves or others hit numbers over the claimed torque limit of 265wtq.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 03:56 PM
  #29  
Euripides's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Canada
Well im not saying there couldnt be issues, but remember the gains that the Ralliart get wont be that close to the Evo X, so your not going to be running over 300tq to the wheels, I am getting the reflash , and then exhaust later on, and yeah until AMS gets their ralliarts to that we will see what the limits are
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2009 | 04:52 PM
  #30  
Dennis F's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 494
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Deleted.

Last edited by Dennis F; Feb 18, 2009 at 10:00 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:32 AM.