Dyno results at AMS! (broadband needed)
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
That's a fair call.
I thought the stock SST was good for 300/300??????
Has anyone confirmed the difference between our SST and the EVO SST? There was something going around that it was just the way it was tuned and therefore our gearboxes could handle alot more than people thought.
Either way, great figures and as long as you're happy with the results then that's all that matters
I thought the stock SST was good for 300/300??????
Has anyone confirmed the difference between our SST and the EVO SST? There was something going around that it was just the way it was tuned and therefore our gearboxes could handle alot more than people thought.
Either way, great figures and as long as you're happy with the results then that's all that matters
Keith
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
I just realized that there isn't an RPM given along with the peak values:
Run 1 peak HP was 259.61 at 5750 RPM and torque peak was 283.66 at 4300 RPM.
Run 2 peak HP was 256.82 at 5580 RPM and torque peak was 286.60 at 4250 RPM.
Run 2 peak HP was 251.85 at 5700 RPM and torque peak was 279.45 at 4160 RPM. Run 3 was the run that had the phantom knock right at 4300 RPM jacking up the results.
Later,
Keith
Run 1 peak HP was 259.61 at 5750 RPM and torque peak was 283.66 at 4300 RPM.
Run 2 peak HP was 256.82 at 5580 RPM and torque peak was 286.60 at 4250 RPM.
Run 2 peak HP was 251.85 at 5700 RPM and torque peak was 279.45 at 4160 RPM. Run 3 was the run that had the phantom knock right at 4300 RPM jacking up the results.
Later,
Keith
Evolving Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: PA
i don't think the 300/300 is confirmed i think people are doing it but they are playing with fire. of course AMS is in that range but they could afford to blow the tranny. i bet once the tranny goes on the AMS ralliart, Eric is gonna go for a straight GSR manual conversion. but thats AMS compared to us boke asses, see most of us can't afford $6,000 for parts and labor on a tranny swap. i don't know for sure if thats what it will cost but i know its definately better then buying a 12,000 SSt tranny. my clutches are already slipping at the same wtq that fourdoor has thats why we needed to bting down a bit.
As far as EVO SST and RA SST different tuning, different gear ratios and other hardware as well but the person i spoke to would not disclose that part.
As far as EVO SST and RA SST different tuning, different gear ratios and other hardware as well but the person i spoke to would not disclose that part.
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
i don't think the 300/300 is confirmed i think people are doing it but they are playing with fire. of course AMS is in that range but they could afford to blow the tranny. i bet once the tranny goes on the AMS ralliart, Eric is gonna go for a straight GSR manual conversion. but thats AMS compared to us boke asses, see most of us can't afford $6,000 for parts and labor on a tranny swap. i don't know for sure if thats what it will cost but i know its definately better then buying a 12,000 SSt tranny. my clutches are already slipping at the same wtq that fourdoor has thats why we needed to bting down a bit.
As far as EVO SST and RA SST different tuning, different gear ratios and other hardware as well but the person i spoke to would not disclose that part.
As far as EVO SST and RA SST different tuning, different gear ratios and other hardware as well but the person i spoke to would not disclose that part.
Keith
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
Keith
