Notices

A/F ratio with Injen CAI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 09:06 AM
  #1  
sunshdw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Meridian, ID
A/F ratio with Injen CAI

After reading a few threads on here about needing(not) a tune after installing a CAI I wondered why that would be. I figured the MAF sensor should adjust for it so you should be fine. Now I'm not saying that sensor will adjust if you put a turbo back exhaust, boost pill and CAI rather just for a CAI. So the past Sunday I installed my Injen CAI (http://www.injen.com/Galleries/ProductPress/SP1837P.jpg ), EVO X I/C and EVO X I/C Piping. Lastnight was the first chance I had to test my A/F ratio using an older verion of this inovative ( http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/products/lm2.php ) wideband. The results are as follows:

Idle: No reading - I plugged the exhaust pipe the sensor wasn't in and saw 21.9 to 14.5. Unplugged the pipe and there was nothing

Approx 1/2 throttle 3rd gear (man. mode) from 2k to 6k: 12.5 to 11.8 - Blocking one of the pipes made no difference here.

Full throttle 3rd gear (man. mode) 2k to 6k: 11.6 to 11.0 - Tried to block one on the pipes but my rag wouldn't stay. Reguardless if both pipes were open this should be a good reading.

This test was done by myself so the A/F numbers are an approx reading. I was trying to watch the road, look for cops, watch the meter and watch my boost gauge. Now I can agree on a tune to lean out the full throttle fatness but I'm not sure I will. Running a little fat is safer, to me anyways.

2009 WW Ralliart
Injen CAI
Evo X I/C
Evo X I/C piping
No tune
~52deg
~2700ft elevation in Meridian, ID
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2010 | 09:35 AM
  #2  
Psycho09RA's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Sunset, UT
Good to know. Thanks for posting your results!
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 12:57 AM
  #3  
RotorGlow's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Alberta
I would say that NO tune is required, just like the product suggests.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 11:11 AM
  #4  
secondchace's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
and i would say a tune IS required for ultimate safety and reliability.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 11:41 AM
  #5  
initial_d2k's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, QC
wow .. this seems like an ongoing debate for the rest of RA's lifetime..
I guess I wont put in my AEM intake + Evo MAF tube yet then...
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 12:05 PM
  #6  
lancer0220's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by initial_d2k
wow .. this seems like an ongoing debate for the rest of RA's lifetime..
I guess I wont put in my AEM intake + Evo MAF tube yet then...
as you read in the other thread about hte evo maf tube and cone filter you will be fine with no tune, this has been proven already.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 12:16 PM
  #7  
initial_d2k's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, QC
yeah i read about that already .. what i mean is I should do more research before putting it. I just feel safer when I know more facts about what I'm putting in my car..
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 08:15 AM
  #8  
sunshdw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Meridian, ID
Originally Posted by secondchace
and i would say a tune IS required for ultimate safety and reliability.
Would you eleborate on this??
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 09:15 AM
  #9  
RotorGlow's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Alberta
CAI = increase in air flow + density (due to cooler air)
Ralliart fueling = rich from factory (install a straight through test pipe, and you will smell it)
CAI + Ralliart overfueling = perfectly fine
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 11:21 AM
  #10  
secondchace's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by sunshdw
Would you eleborate on this??
while rotor glow seems to think he knows what an intakes hes never seen will do, i have seen 2 installed near me, both showed lousy air fuel.

At wot both were in the mid to high 12's 12.7-12.9 which isnt in the 13's but also isnt safe. Its always safest to let someone make the parts work for you.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 12:39 PM
  #11  
sunshdw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Meridian, ID
Originally Posted by secondchace
while rotor glow seems to think he knows what an intakes hes never seen will do, i have seen 2 installed near me, both showed lousy air fuel.

At wot both were in the mid to high 12's 12.7-12.9 which isnt in the 13's but also isnt safe. Its always safest to let someone make the parts work for you.
In case a 5yr old wrote your response, let me understand you're saying. You tested a RA with just an cold air intake of some brand and at WOT your a/f numbers were high 12's? If thats the case then yeah a tune would be a good idea. However based on the information i've provided you're telling me my figures are unsafe?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 02:33 PM
  #12  
RotorGlow's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Alberta
You see he never mentions the fact that those intakes were NOT Injen products. Do not trust those other products out there, they WILL cause your ratios to be that high. All you have to do is read http://www.injen.com/Galleries/ProductPress/SP1837P.jpg and find out yourself that...

"MR Technology (tunes intakes to factory air/fuel ratios) patented"

That says it all. Injen is the ONLY safe one out there, and they hold the patent so that NO ONE else can copy them.

INJEN IS SAFE TO USE, bottom line.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 02:36 PM
  #13  
secondchace's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by sunshdw
In case a 5yr old wrote your response, let me understand you're saying. You tested a RA with just an cold air intake of some brand and at WOT your a/f numbers were high 12's? If thats the case then yeah a tune would be a good idea. However based on the information i've provided you're telling me my figures are unsafe?

lol

no if you could read, then you would have seen where i said there have been 2 ralliarts in my area, whom have purchased the Injen intake system and had their car dynoed and tuned. Prior to the tune, the A/F was logged on the dyno by the tuner, both showing high 12's for afr.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 02:37 PM
  #14  
secondchace's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by RotorGlow
You see he never mentions the fact that those intakes were NOT Injen products. Do not trust those other products out there, they WILL cause your ratios to be that high. All you have to do is read http://www.injen.com/Galleries/ProductPress/SP1837P.jpg and find out yourself that...

"MR Technology (tunes intakes to factory air/fuel ratios) patented"

That says it all. Injen is the ONLY safe one out there, and they hold the patent so that NO ONE else can copy them.

INJEN IS SAFE TO USE, bottom line.
fail wrong, but i bet you like house hippos, seeing how you believe everything you see.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 02:53 PM
  #15  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by RotorGlow
You see he never mentions the fact that those intakes were NOT Injen products. Do not trust those other products out there, they WILL cause your ratios to be that high. All you have to do is read http://www.injen.com/Galleries/ProductPress/SP1837P.jpg and find out yourself that...

"MR Technology (tunes intakes to factory air/fuel ratios) patented"

That says it all. Injen is the ONLY safe one out there, and they hold the patent so that NO ONE else can copy them.

INJEN IS SAFE TO USE, bottom line.
Wait wait wait, your argument is that because Injen says their intake is safe and the best, it's safe and the best? Am I hearing that right? Personally I don't like the idea of an intake that intentionally allows unmetered air by in order to lean out the tune thus making power.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:08 PM.