CBRD RAD Turbo
Jun 10, 2011, 12:55 PM
#16
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
..... I believe he even said that it really wouldn't even be worth producing since even the stock turbo can push peak torque early enough that the RAD "full" wouldn't be worth the extra cost over the standard RAD, not to mention the headaches it would cause with the SS-T.
This is all from a fading memory, so correct me if I'm wrong.
This is all from a fading memory, so correct me if I'm wrong.
Jun 10, 2011, 01:00 PM
#17
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you just want solid X turbo power then no you don't need to upgrade the injectors I don't think but you will need a competent tuner to make sure your in a comfortable zone.
Jun 10, 2011, 02:16 PM
#18
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Preliminary Numbers
I just got the call that my Cobb pro tune with the CBRD RAD turbo is done, and the numbers are right about where I expected they should be.
Preliminary dyno numbers are 292 AWHP, 302 AWTQ making about 25PSI.
I know the injectors never exceeded their duty cycle, I'll get more precise information when I pick up the car tomorrow.
It should be fun driving her home from the tuner!
Preliminary dyno numbers are 292 AWHP, 302 AWTQ making about 25PSI.
I know the injectors never exceeded their duty cycle, I'll get more precise information when I pick up the car tomorrow.
It should be fun driving her home from the tuner!
Last edited by RideSober; Jun 10, 2011 at 08:45 PM.
Jun 10, 2011, 02:20 PM
#19
Good numbers.
There is no way that Max IDC should have been reached. I am pretty sure that I have sorted out what is wrong, but I will generate some hard data before out and out blasting a vendor on this site.
That being said, it is one of two possible things that could be wrong with the car. Either way, it is going to be a shame for someone.
There is no way that Max IDC should have been reached. I am pretty sure that I have sorted out what is wrong, but I will generate some hard data before out and out blasting a vendor on this site.
That being said, it is one of two possible things that could be wrong with the car. Either way, it is going to be a shame for someone.
Last edited by NFSLancerRA; Jun 10, 2011 at 02:23 PM.
Jun 10, 2011, 03:21 PM
#20
Good numbers.
There is no way that Max IDC should have been reached. I am pretty sure that I have sorted out what is wrong, but I will generate some hard data before out and out blasting a vendor on this site.
That being said, it is one of two possible things that could be wrong with the car. Either way, it is going to be a shame for someone.
There is no way that Max IDC should have been reached. I am pretty sure that I have sorted out what is wrong, but I will generate some hard data before out and out blasting a vendor on this site.
That being said, it is one of two possible things that could be wrong with the car. Either way, it is going to be a shame for someone.
Jun 10, 2011, 03:59 PM
#21
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NoVA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just got the call that my Cobb pro tune with the CBRD RAD turbo is done, and the numbers are right about where I expected they should be.
Preliminary numbers on a stingy Mustang dyno are 292 AWHP, 302 AWTQ making about 25PSI.
I know the injectors never exceeded their duty cycle, I'll get more precise information when I pick up the car tomorrow.
It should be fun driving her home from the tuner!
Preliminary numbers on a stingy Mustang dyno are 292 AWHP, 302 AWTQ making about 25PSI.
I know the injectors never exceeded their duty cycle, I'll get more precise information when I pick up the car tomorrow.
It should be fun driving her home from the tuner!
Jun 10, 2011, 04:34 PM
#22
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just got the call that my Cobb pro tune with the CBRD RAD turbo is done, and the numbers are right about where I expected they should be.
Preliminary numbers on a stingy Mustang dyno are 292 AWHP, 302 AWTQ making about 25PSI.
I know the injectors never exceeded their duty cycle, I'll get more precise information when I pick up the car tomorrow.
It should be fun driving her home from the tuner!
Preliminary numbers on a stingy Mustang dyno are 292 AWHP, 302 AWTQ making about 25PSI.
I know the injectors never exceeded their duty cycle, I'll get more precise information when I pick up the car tomorrow.
It should be fun driving her home from the tuner!
Do you have an AP? If So I would love to see a log of your injector duty cycle at wot in 3rd gear pulled to redline.... I'm willing to bet the duty cycle is over 90% at 7,000 rpm.
Jun 13, 2011, 10:47 AM
#27
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While the Mach V dyno results may not seem that impressive at 292 AWHP and 302 AWTQ (on a very humid and blistering hot 100 degree Summer day), the CBRD RAD Turbo added a serious impact to the "seat of the pants" dynomometer!
Acceleration is DRAMATICALLY improved over the Cobb Stage 2 tune I was previously running that has been shown to put out 262AWHP and 310AWTQ on the Cobb Tuning Mustang Dyno.
I would venture a bet that in head to head acceleration evaluations, this car would now surprise quite a few stock EVO owners...
I am done with my modifications, and am looking to move on to my next project. Check my signature below, and SERIOUS PARTIES please contact me if you are interested in information about my car.
Acceleration is DRAMATICALLY improved over the Cobb Stage 2 tune I was previously running that has been shown to put out 262AWHP and 310AWTQ on the Cobb Tuning Mustang Dyno.
I would venture a bet that in head to head acceleration evaluations, this car would now surprise quite a few stock EVO owners...
I am done with my modifications, and am looking to move on to my next project. Check my signature below, and SERIOUS PARTIES please contact me if you are interested in information about my car.
Jun 13, 2011, 10:51 AM
#28
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So I'm assuming you didn't need to upgrade the injectors or fuel pump for those numbers. Just trying to gauge what I'm going to need to do this myself. Thanks.
Jun 13, 2011, 12:25 PM
#30
While the Mach V dyno results may not seem that impressive at 292 AWHP and 302 AWTQ (on a very humid and blistering hot 100 degree Summer day), the CBRD RAD Turbo added a serious impact to the "seat of the pants" dynomometer!
Acceleration is DRAMATICALLY improved over the Cobb Stage 2 tune I was previously running that has been shown to put out 262AWHP and 310AWTQ on the Cobb Tuning Mustang Dyno.
I would venture a bet that in head to head acceleration evaluations, this car would now surprise quite a few stock EVO owners...
I am done with my modifications, and am looking to move on to my next project. Check my signature below, and SERIOUS PARTIES please contact me if you are interested in information about my car.
Acceleration is DRAMATICALLY improved over the Cobb Stage 2 tune I was previously running that has been shown to put out 262AWHP and 310AWTQ on the Cobb Tuning Mustang Dyno.
I would venture a bet that in head to head acceleration evaluations, this car would now surprise quite a few stock EVO owners...
I am done with my modifications, and am looking to move on to my next project. Check my signature below, and SERIOUS PARTIES please contact me if you are interested in information about my car.