Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Decisions... - DC Sports Manifold or Stock Ported/Coated

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2005 | 10:59 PM
  #1  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Decisions... - DC Sports Manifold or Stock Ported/Coated

This decision I have to make about what route to take with a manifold is killing me!
The price difference is negligible.

First up:

1)Stock Exhaust manifold - ported and ceramic coated

Positives: Stock reliability (from cracking)
Negatives: Not much of a power gain as DC

2)DC Sports Manifold

Positives: Power gain (but how much? Turbo mag showed 11whp at 1psi less boost!)
Negatives: Possibility of it cracking, especially since I plan to run aftermarket 02


Basically, I can get the stock one, not worry about anything cracking (especially when using aftermarket 02 such as Helix). Or I can get the DC which will most likely make more power for around the same price but Id have to have the possibilty of it cracking.... I need some GOOD opionions here!
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2005 | 11:03 PM
  #2  
Curt@MrLed's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (107)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,364
Likes: 0
From: A.K.A. DaFarmer
there was a big thread on this last week.. but my opion is go with the tube header, my prefence, dnp, and get it coated... cause stainless is a b1tch to keep clean... i ran dnp for 2 years no probs.. with the header i had, big o2, and 3 inch pipe i could hit 22 psi at 3100 rpm, from a rolling idle..
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2005 | 04:36 AM
  #3  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Anyone that buys a header I have an offer for you. Bring the car to our shop with the stock manifold, we will dyno it. Then install the header and dyno again for free.

I want to find a header that works, if we do we will sell it. As of now, I have seen nothing but losses.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2005 | 04:37 AM
  #4  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
BTW, the dyno runs are free, not the install of the header.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2005 | 07:31 AM
  #5  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Personally, I havent seen any dynos of ANY headers what-so ever, other than the DC one... however I would definitely get it ceramic coated like the stock one. Dafarmer, what 02 did you have?

David, is it possible to send you a stock EVO manifold and you JUST port it, no jet coat?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2005 | 08:12 AM
  #6  
LordEvoIX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: World's largest Archipelago
Originally Posted by Soon2BEVO
Positives: Power gain (but how much? Turbo mag showed 11whp at 1psi less boost!)
That's a nice gain for just swapping out the manifold. I'll go with the tubular for sure....isn't it possible to prevent it from cracking under the weight of the turbo by welding it with more bracings?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2005 | 08:25 AM
  #7  
ex-honda's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
From: North bay
For me I would get the stock ported and ceramic coated. I feel that DC or any aftermarket manifold, all you'll save is a little weight. Also if you get pulled over, having the stock ceramic coated is more believable to the cops that it's stock. But if you have something shiny, then they know that it's not smog legal.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2005 | 10:07 AM
  #8  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Originally Posted by ex-honda
Also if you get pulled over, having the stock ceramic coated is more believable to the cops that it's stock. But if you have something shiny, then they know that it's not smog legal.
Thats not an issue around here. Thats a Cali thing from what I know. We dont have to deal with that BS here in NJ.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2005 | 12:13 PM
  #9  
Iceman2011's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
From: Schaumburg IL
bump for some more answers, i am in the same boat as you Soon2BEVO
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2005 | 12:19 PM
  #10  
pyrovice's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor
Originally Posted by Iceman2011
bump for some more answers, i am in the same boat as you Soon2BEVO
+1
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2005 | 12:34 PM
  #11  
Mike@Forge's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
From: Orlando FL
Here is something else to consider:

(I'm not saying any of this to throw a wrench into anyones plans, just providing food for thought)

In an exhaust system on a turbocharged application (including the Evo), there is a certain amount of backpressure inside the exhaust manifold before the turbocharger. (TIP - Turbine Inlet Pressure)

An ideal scenario would be to have this backpressure equal exactly the amount of pressure that the intake manifold sees. (same as boost pressure measured from the intake manifold) (which is a pain in the butt to achieve as often as people change their boost pressure)

This scenario provides for the most ideal spool and intake/exhaust flow conditions to allow for the most power.

A larger volume within the capacity of an exhaust manifold can decrease the amount of TIP too much and create a loss of power. Too much TIP within the exhaust manifold can also limit power.

Weight each of your options carefully and find a system that will provide the closest amount of TIP to that of the amount of boost pressure you intend to run, if that information is available (which it may not be).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A separate yet equally important point:

On a naturally aspirated vehicle, there needs to be a specific amount of backpressure within the entire exhaust system to maintain the highest level of torque as well as horsepower. Using an exhaust system that is too open can result in higher horsepower, but at the sacrifice of some torque.

This is not the case on a turbocharged application, however, where there is no reason to have backpressure in the exhaust after the turbo. Having too open of an exhaust will create additional noise and possibly fitment issues, which need to be considered for the areas that you live and drive in, but on any turbocharged application, the highest flowing exhaust possible is ideal. (after the turbo)

Last edited by Mike@Forge; Oct 18, 2005 at 12:37 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2005 | 12:57 PM
  #12  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Thanks for the info!

Well I decided for now Im going to go with the DC manifold. It looks like much better quality to me than the Megan, SS, Pro-1, Maxford, etc. Those all look EXACTLY alike and I have hard of them breaking and Ive yet to see a dyno on them. However, since the DC has a warranty against cracking, priced well, AND has an independent dyno of it via Turbo Mag, I chose it. Im going to have it HPC coated as well!

Tom
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2005 | 01:14 PM
  #13  
Silencer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Anyone that buys a header I have an offer for you. Bring the car to our shop with the stock manifold, we will dyno it. Then install the header and dyno again for free.

I want to find a header that works, if we do we will sell it. As of now, I have seen nothing but losses.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
David, why not cordinate with Ron and have him build and test a header to sell? I'll commit to the first purchase if you can make some hp and/or torque w/o loss of boost pressure.

Dave
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2005 | 01:54 PM
  #14  
RallySport Direct's Avatar
Silver Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 1
From: SLC, Utah
I personally dynoed the GT Spec header and it made pretty nice power for just a manifold with no tune.



Ben
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2005 | 02:16 PM
  #15  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Mike@Forge
On a naturally aspirated vehicle, there needs to be a specific amount of backpressure within the entire exhaust system to maintain the highest level of torque as well as horsepower. Using an exhaust system that is too open can result in higher horsepower, but at the sacrifice of some torque.
Actually, that's a very common misconception. In reality, backpressure never created anything but pumping losses.

The primary reason why one too large of an exhaust system in a N/A app reduces efficiency is because exhaust gas velocity is reduced to a point that it takes a toll on the inertia effect that helps to draw the intake charge into the cylinder. On the other hand, where backpressure is concerned, if you're seeing something like 2psi or greater in a N/A exhaust system, you're losing power. It's a tradeoff, and the best compromise comes with competent planning.

A turbo system is a bit different, as exhaust tuning is most significant between the exhaust port and the turbine inlet. As you mentioned, this directly affects the pressure ratio between the intake and exhaust. As always, you give up something to gain something else.

A tubular manifold, with equal length runners tuned for best efficiency in the same rpm range as the intake runners, with a very efficient collector, will outperform anything else. The variability of aftermarket manifolds makes this somewhat of a crapshoot. Furthermore, things like the size of your turbo, the tuning of your cams, etc., all weigh into the equation heavily enough to make individual experiences subject to variability.

Last edited by Ted B; Oct 18, 2005 at 03:39 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:47 AM.