Notices
ECU Flash

EvoScan V.90 Is Ready

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 09:14 AM
  #136  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by mchuang
Let me ask you have you ever upgraded the firmware on your wideband? He is using 4.1 and comport 4. and the baudrate is 9600 on the serial cable in device manager.
I upgraded the firmware once a while back. I will check and see if I have the latest firmware and update to the 4.1. Some are saying that you need to disconnect the input cable from the LMA-2 (the device that transmits boos, knock to my LM-1) inorder to get the AFR signal from the LM-1 to log on Evoscan. I have not tested yet and I hope that this is not the case. It will be a setback if it is.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 12:43 PM
  #137  
justchil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
I'm still wondering how accurate the coolant temp is... today I flushed my coolant out so it was a good time to see what temp evoscan says the thermostat opens. Well it opens somewhere between 212-214f (100-101c) going by evoscan. This seems pretty high to me...

I don't think there were any changes to this from .8 so this could be OT
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 12:55 PM
  #138  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Originally Posted by justchil
I'm still wondering how accurate the coolant temp is... today I flushed my coolant out so it was a good time to see what temp evoscan says the thermostat opens. Well it opens somewhere between 212-214f (100-101c) going by evoscan. This seems pretty high to me...

I don't think there were any changes to this from .8 so this could be OT
Werent you using the updated forumula?

I changed this in my xml file, but then 0.9 went back to the old formula.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 01:55 PM
  #139  
Rob W.'s Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Clarkston, MI
So what coolant temp formula do you recommend?
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 02:46 PM
  #140  
justchil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Well on .8 I was subtracting 10* but I must not have changed that in .9.

Looking at the evo manual.. Valve opening temperate is 176+/- 3. I'd assume the fan kicks on the same time the thermostat opens.. could be a problem with my setup I suppose.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 02:55 PM
  #141  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
I will try to find it. It is posted in this ecuflash forum somewhere.

I had it posted in DF forums, but in an effort to discredit evoscan so people won't review their knocksums using a DF, he called evoscan inaccurate and deleted the coolant temp formula I had posted. The formula came from another member.

I encourage all of my reflash customers to review the knocksums from my custom tunes.

TTP has nothing to hide unlike others.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 03:58 PM
  #142  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by justchil
I'm still wondering how accurate the coolant temp is... today I flushed my coolant out so it was a good time to see what temp evoscan says the thermostat opens. Well it opens somewhere between 212-214f (100-101c) going by evoscan. This seems pretty high to me...

I don't think there were any changes to this from .8 so this could be OT
I tested on the ver 0.8 and my pocketlogger and I found that the Evoscan is off. With the pocket logger the fan kicks in @ 190-192*. With the EvoScan the fan kicks in around 210-212*. That was with version 0.8. I have not tested the version 0.9 yet.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 04:14 PM
  #143  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
I will try to find it. It is posted in this ecuflash forum somewhere.

I had it posted in DF forums, but in an effort to discredit evoscan so people won't review their knocksums using a DF, he called evoscan inaccurate and deleted the coolant temp formula I had posted. The formula came from another member.

I encourage all of my reflash customers to review the knocksums from my custom tunes.

TTP has nothing to hide unlike others.
So AL is now saying that the KS results are wrong since the coolant temp formula is off That is his way to prevent people from using Evoscan to find out if his tune is knock prone or not. Does he not know that there are a million other ways to detect knock aside from Evoscan
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 05:12 PM
  #144  
mchuang's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,180
Likes: 1
From: h town
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
I will try to find it. It is posted in this ecuflash forum somewhere.

I had it posted in DF forums, but in an effort to discredit evoscan so people won't review their knocksums using a DF, he called evoscan inaccurate and deleted the coolant temp formula I had posted. The formula came from another member.

I encourage all of my reflash customers to review the knocksums from my custom tunes.

TTP has nothing to hide unlike others.
Wow some bs, I swear that foo dirty so dam dirty. No other tuners have dirt like him on this forum. Too bad some cannot see the wolf in sheep clothing..
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 07:25 PM
  #145  
AlwaysinBoost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
From: In da streetz
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
TTP has nothing to hide unlike others.
really... is that why you purchase Megan Racing exhausts and then tell EVOm that they are custom made by your 'fabricator'.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 07:37 PM
  #146  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
Originally Posted by mchuang
see the wolf in sheep clothing..
you mean like mormons? JK I'm a mormon, well - not really. This thread has gone astray, mods?
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 08:43 PM
  #147  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
Mitsubishi Logger Alpha proof of concept code WORKS.. an alternative logger will be available soon...

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=223828
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 11:12 PM
  #148  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
I will try to find it. It is posted in this ecuflash forum somewhere.

...
Here is the coolant temperature correlation that jcsbanks posted from a 1G DSM ECU:

***EDIT: This is the intake air temperature formula***
-0.00000003166xxxxx+0.00001425xxxx-0.002490xxx+0.2143xx-10.279x+361.01
***

Here is the air temperature correlation:

***EDIT: This is the coolant temperature formula***
-0.0003893xxx+0.08056xx-6.5226x+315.73
***

There's no guarantee that those eqns are exactly right for an Evo, but they appear to be much closer than the eqns released with EvoScan. Copy them into the Data.xml file just as they are written above.

Last edited by mrfred; Sep 17, 2006 at 08:57 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 11:44 PM
  #149  
justchil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Sweet man thanks again

If anyone here has another logger how about comparing this formula to your other logger
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2006 | 12:25 AM
  #150  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
Originally Posted by mrfred
Here is the coolant temperature correlation that jcsbanks posted from a 1G DSM ECU:

-0.00000003166xxxxx+0.00001425xxxx-0.002490xxx+0.2143xx-10.279x+361.01

Here is the air temperature correlation:

-0.0003893xxx+0.08056xx-6.5226x+315.73

There's no guarantee that those eqns are exactly right for an Evo, but they appear to be much closer than the eqns released with EvoScan. Copy them into the Data.xml file just as they are written above.
These do work better.. they allow Evoscan to evaluate the data in a nonlinear fashion instead of a simple linear equation.. Unfortunately these calculations create interative loops and slow down evoscan a bit.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:41 AM.