Notices
ECU Flash

EvoScan V.90 Is Ready

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 01:09 AM
  #91  
codgi's Avatar
Evolved Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 41
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
I've seen this before, its specifically looking for assemblies from the older versions of .NET therefore you'll have to install the older .NET 1.1.xxxx if you didn't already have it..
Odd shouldn't be necessary. Oh well. The best way to do this will be to actually uninstall the newest version, install the old one and then re-install the newest version. Don't want to attempt to register the old 1.1.xxxx files over the new ones cause that will cause problems going the other way.

Last edited by codgi; Sep 13, 2006 at 01:12 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 10:27 AM
  #92  
justchil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Has anyone seen any issues with the "speed" column? I have a peak speak of 178 lol.. I may have hit 100 tops.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 10:31 AM
  #93  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
Originally Posted by codgi
Odd shouldn't be necessary. Oh well. The best way to do this will be to actually uninstall the newest version, install the old one and then re-install the newest version. Don't want to attempt to register the old 1.1.xxxx files over the new ones cause that will cause problems going the other way.
Apparently there are assembly references to DLL's specific to 1.1, files which don't exist in the 2.0 I noticed this while working on something else in my own code on another project.. When I looked at this one, it had the same dependency.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 10:32 AM
  #94  
Rob W.'s Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Clarkston, MI
For a USDM EVO, you need to convert kph to mph. The data file looks like he labeled it as mph, but it's not correct.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 11:18 AM
  #95  
Guerillah's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 760
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by justchil
Has anyone seen any issues with the "speed" column? I have a peak speak of 178 lol.. I may have hit 100 tops.
Speed is definately off. Says I hit 138mph and I didnt even shift into 4th gear :/
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 11:44 AM
  #96  
Guerillah's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 760
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ
Also the octane number is fubar from what I logged last night.. Stays at 100 and doesnt move. No more than 2 knock counts doing a 1-3rd pull multiple times. With 0.80 is reads 255.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 12:04 PM
  #97  
Rob W.'s Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Clarkston, MI
The octane number is still working fine, but it's now be corrected to a 0-100 scale (think of it as a percentage if you want). It's unitless anyway. You can see it in the data.xml file: octane = "100x/255".
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 12:13 PM
  #98  
jcsbanks's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 6
From: UK
There are issues between cars in different markets. On a car from anywhere in the world the scaling is 2x with the unit km/h except for cars which have km/h to mph converters where the unit then becomes mph. The latter applies to the officially imported UK market cars.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 04:20 PM
  #99  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
I think the speed is off because it thinks your in two gears higher
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 04:51 PM
  #100  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
The scaling in the speed definition in v0.9 is not for mph (even though its labeled as such). Change ...Eval="2x"... to ...Eval="1.24x"...
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 05:00 PM
  #101  
justchil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Ty!
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 09:36 PM
  #102  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
thanks fred
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 10:02 PM
  #103  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
np.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 10:36 PM
  #104  
codgi's Avatar
Evolved Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 41
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
Apparently there are assembly references to DLL's specific to 1.1, files which don't exist in the 2.0 I noticed this while working on something else in my own code on another project.. When I looked at this one, it had the same dependency.
Fair enough.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 11:25 AM
  #105  
julianc's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Has everyone received their email link to download v0.9? Am I the only one still waiting?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:57 AM.