Evolving Member
Quote:
Nice job. I go to Lane Tech and Inventor is where it's at, or according to my teacher. Maybe I should be a product engineer? Originally Posted by honki24
very nice work. That is top notch engineering. I'm no nutswinger of any performance shop, but I know good engineering when I see it. Plus way to go on Solidworks lol I hate Pro-E and Inventor.
AMS, you guys are awesome. Once the summer hits, I plan on seeing your store/garage.
Evolving Member
Quote:
You want to know what is the best CADD software is, the one that has the most employment opportunities, and that would be Pro-E Wildfire.
you are on crack if you think Pro-E is the most commonly used CAD tool... Originally Posted by mdsevo06
CADD systems are a tool, period. You have to pick the right tool for the job and for AMS, Solidworks is inexpensive and easy to learn. Catia is a very nice package and has the potential to be the next big CADD software. But, at the moment, how many companies and especially goverment contract companies, use Catia? A hand full at best. Pro-E is used by thousands at the moment, including General Atomics, Northrop Grumman, Hughes, Lockheed Martin, Solar Turbines..etcYou want to know what is the best CADD software is, the one that has the most employment opportunities, and that would be Pro-E Wildfire.
In the auto industry and aerspace... Catia is most popular.. the surfacing capabilities alone, make it the dominant CAD software package for aerospace..
Update: only Toyota's transmission group still uses Pro-E, the rest of development uses Catia...
And yes, Catia v5 does crash a bit more than it should, but it is way better than V4!
.
Evolving Member
Quote:
? At lease 50K
Hire me
I think it is even more than that... DSS charges over a hundred thousand for a fully unlocked version of catiaOriginally Posted by juanmedina
Do you know how much a CATIA seed cost
? At lease 50KHire me
Former Sponsor
Quote:
Devin
wow Did you hit the nail on the head.Originally Posted by Solo Evo
It seems like whenever I read a thread that contains CAD images, a Pro-E vs. Solid Works debate erupts. Devin
Eric
Evolved Member
Stupid engineers. Oh wait that's me too.
Good to see you guys using CAD tools, it can only help. Like the others said the standard plug-in analysis packages in Solidworks are just teasers to get you to buy the real versions. I've used the full blown non-linear Cosmos and Motion and it's pretty cool. The flow analysis in 2008 is worthless just like the Moldflow was in the prior versions. But it's better than nothing I guess.
Are those end tanks SLS or just SLA's.
For companies like AMS Solidworks owns. I work for a large company that uses Pro-E and Solidworks and projects can be finished in 2/3rds the time in Solidworks as opposed to Pro-E and it's crappy user interfaces. That's a big deal when time is money.
Boeing uses Catia and it truly is the way to go when spending the big bucks, but it is really for Billion dollar global companies. Solidworks owns the small to mid-size business market. I let customers know their project will take longer to complete if done in Pro-E, I hate it.
GO AMS, welcome to the party, for your business you TOTALLY made the correct decision to run Solidworks.
Good to see you guys using CAD tools, it can only help. Like the others said the standard plug-in analysis packages in Solidworks are just teasers to get you to buy the real versions. I've used the full blown non-linear Cosmos and Motion and it's pretty cool. The flow analysis in 2008 is worthless just like the Moldflow was in the prior versions. But it's better than nothing I guess.
Are those end tanks SLS or just SLA's.
For companies like AMS Solidworks owns. I work for a large company that uses Pro-E and Solidworks and projects can be finished in 2/3rds the time in Solidworks as opposed to Pro-E and it's crappy user interfaces. That's a big deal when time is money.
Boeing uses Catia and it truly is the way to go when spending the big bucks, but it is really for Billion dollar global companies. Solidworks owns the small to mid-size business market. I let customers know their project will take longer to complete if done in Pro-E, I hate it.
GO AMS, welcome to the party, for your business you TOTALLY made the correct decision to run Solidworks.
Evolving Member
indeed.... thinking about it rationally, it doesn't matter which one you use, as long as the guy ( or girl) running program know what they are doing...
it is the operator that matters not the software...
but with that being said,,, Catia still kicks ***!
it is the operator that matters not the software...
but with that being said,,, Catia still kicks ***!
Evolved Member
Quote:
I work for a large company that uses Pro-E and Solidworks and projects can be finished in 2/3rds the time in Solidworks as opposed to Pro-E and it's crappy user interfaces.
Originally Posted by jid2@[BINARY]
I work for a large company that uses Pro-E and Solidworks and projects can be finished in 2/3rds the time in Solidworks as opposed to Pro-E and it's crappy user interfaces.

Evolved Member
Quote:
In the auto industry and aerspace... Catia is most popular.. the surfacing capabilities alone, make it the dominant CAD software package for aerospace..
Update: only Toyota's transmission group still uses Pro-E, the rest of development uses Catia...
And yes, Catia v5 does crash a bit more than it should, but it is way better than V4!
.
You've worked for the companies I've mentioned? I have. Northrop Grummans Global Hawk and the new BAMS, all designed using Pro-E Wildfire. General Atomics UAV Predator, and the new EMALS (Electro Magnetic Aircraft Launch System) for the new CVN, designed using Pro-E. Hughes Satelites, once again, Pro-E. If you don't have Aerospace experience, don't spread fauls information.Originally Posted by 4G63DSM
you are on crack if you think Pro-E is the most commonly used CAD tool... In the auto industry and aerspace... Catia is most popular.. the surfacing capabilities alone, make it the dominant CAD software package for aerospace..
Update: only Toyota's transmission group still uses Pro-E, the rest of development uses Catia...
And yes, Catia v5 does crash a bit more than it should, but it is way better than V4!
.
And don't make personal attacks on me, with your drug comment...you tool!
Evolved Member
Quote:
There is no point in arguing over consoles ... Xbox 360 and the Wii is where it's at for gameplay, and after Sony bribing the movie industry to go with Blue Ray, I guess the PS3 is finally worth it as a BlueRay player.Originally Posted by TiALSport
This is almost as bad as arguing over video game consoles LOL
l8r)
... let's see how far OT we can get... hehe
Former Sponsor
guys please stop arguing about different programs. That is not what this thread is about.
Eric
Eric
Evolving Member
yooo i am not going to fron the race intercooler yall have on my pops car looks good and yall bettering the intercooler its time for a trade in lol
Evolving Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiALSport
This is almost as bad as arguing over video game consoles LOL

sooo true....no wonder the rest of the world thinks engineers are nerds...
As to being back on topic...are your engineers going to get into the thread and do a little introduction of themselves? a little background or something...?
Newbie
homemade, I was on NIU FSAE 03-07. I think I stopped by the ODU pit once and asked about your diff. I think it was the first year at the MPG.