Notices
Automotosports - Illinois Automotosports is a Chicago based tuner specializing in 4G63T performance. With an in-house fabrication facility and engineers on staff, they will be bringing you the best in Lancer Evolution parts.

Inside the AMS Engineering Department...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 12:31 PM
  #1  
RichK@AMS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Thumbs up Inside the AMS Engineering Department...

Our customers are aware that we manufacture quality products, but few seem to know that each product is skillfully crafted by our talented engineering staff.

By using Solid Works’ 2008 Computer Aided Design (CAD), the AMS engineering staff manufactures quality parts that offer superior performance. The staff also employs Finite Element Analysis (FEA), a stress-tester, to make sure that each part is optimized for performance and durability before it is even made.

Finally, we put our parts through rigorous road-testing and track-testing with the AMS Road Racing and Drag Racing programs before production. If a part can withstand the abuse from our race cars, it will definitely last on the street.





AMS Product Engineer Drew Johnson


AMS Product Engineer Corey Pew


Prototype AMS Small brake kit


FMIC Prototype


Simulated flow testing


Rapid prototype FMIC End tank






Fitment testing

Thank you
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 12:49 PM
  #2  
honki24's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
very nice work. That is top notch engineering. I'm no nutswinger of any performance shop, but I know good engineering when I see it. Plus way to go on Solidworks lol I hate Pro-E and Inventor.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 12:55 PM
  #3  
Evo Tengoku's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,237
Likes: 1
From: FLorida
I seriously want to learn that program.

Great job AMS. Thanks for sharing!
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 01:16 PM
  #4  
homemade wrx's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Mooresville, NC
looks all too familiar...solid works is hands down better and easier to use than inventor and pro-e

rapid prototyping for the win too!!

reminds me of FSAE

Last edited by homemade wrx; Apr 29, 2008 at 01:18 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 02:17 PM
  #5  
dave_evolvix's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 544
Likes: 2
From: Champaign, IL
Solid Works is an amazing tool. I actually didn't know it did flow simulations.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 02:35 PM
  #6  
Solo Evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Nice engineering work! I was wondering if I was going to see some rapid prototyping.


It seems like whenever I read a thread that contains CAD images, a Pro-E vs. Solid Works debate erupts. I don't know why, though, because everyone knows Pro-E is a better CAD tool (it's FEA software leaves much to be desired (read: blows), but for that I use ANSYS).


Devin
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 06:47 PM
  #7  
broddey's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Awesome!

p.s. whats the skinny with the new IC?
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 06:53 PM
  #8  
Import Junky's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,673
Likes: 0
From: Lansdale
sweet. I still wouldn't spend the extra money on your parts just because you so called "Engineered Them".....oh wait, come to think of it I do have the AMS TBE, AMS FMIC, AMS LICP.......lol may just a couple of parts.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 10:52 PM
  #9  
bosox28's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Glastonbury, CT / Boston, MA
Nice work, looks all very familiar lol, Solidworks is a great program and I really like using it, the rapid prototyping is really cool too.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 11:37 PM
  #10  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Cast endtanks finally, you guys are balling on a whole 'nother level now....

This is the reason why I fought with whoever was taking my order about getting my items shipped to a different address, half of us (at least me) like to give you my money in exchange not only for your service and expertise but because we know our money is putting right back into making our cars faster and better through actual engineering.

Keep it up!

Scorke
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 11:40 PM
  #11  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
How much worse does the flow get moving the outlet of the endtank from the back door angle to the one the rapid prototypes are wearing? Is the 90 degree turn significantly better/worse, or was it a matter of building for compatibility with your other IC piping setups.

I imagine the turn toward the engine of the car would hurt it but its more "flat" exit in terms of location horizontally in the end tank might help it?

Scorke
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 06:16 AM
  #12  
thunderbt3's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Carol Stream, IL
AMS hooked our FSAE car up with a dyno run . Thanks for the hookup!

My new job is Pro-E intensive, I wish I could go back to Solidworks but most of our customers are hardcore Pro-E. I think SW2008 is pretty similar to SW2007 but tweaked a little bit for better "user friendliness". I've dabbled with Floworks before and it looks like you guys are using SW Motion as well for in that one pic.

The worse part is I pass by the new shop a few times a week and see all the pretty evo's outside . LMK if you guys need any sidework done

See you guys at the grand opening!

Last edited by thunderbt3; Apr 30, 2008 at 06:20 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 06:19 AM
  #13  
Tristar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,572
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by homemade wrx
looks all too familiar...solid works is hands down better and easier to use than inventor and pro-e

rapid prototyping for the win too!!

reminds me of FSAE
Thats why Toyota, Audi/VW, Ferrari, Harley, etc use Pro-E, right?

Solidworks is cost effective and has a great marketing campaign, use both in industry and then make a decision.

There is a reason the only battle cry Solidworks has is ease of use. I think its easier to have your 200+ part assembly not crash or lock up the computer than it is to have a few easier-to-manage icons. Solidworks has a work limit; a ceiling if you will. Dassault (the parent company) keeps it that way; partially because Solidworks is hacked together on a borrowed kernel, the other bigger reason is Dassault has Catia positioned above it in capabilities. Pro-E is one product, and add-ons determine its limits.

Nice work AMS, probably one of the few shows actually using 3d CAD and Rapid Prototyping. Very neat stuff.

Last edited by Tristar; Apr 30, 2008 at 06:26 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 06:52 AM
  #14  
mdsevo06's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Solidworks is a good tool, but with it's limitations. For a shop like AMS, designing parts with some assemblies, it works great. Onces you start getting in to large top level assemblies and complex surfacing, is where Pro-E Wildfire shines.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 06:53 AM
  #15  
Sean@Iveytune's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 1
From: Linden, NJ
Further Evidence of AMS #1 Status.


Sean
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:53 AM.