Hey everyone, i just took me EVO 9 to the track tonight My first time I ran a 13.0. I ran a 12.1 at 108 my second run. Only mods I have is boost rill removed, tbe, 23psi.

Attached are my slips, and i have topns of wittness if you would like to ask.
Im 4111..On THE LEFT

 

those are some beautiful time slips lol, this is show and shine not show and tell

 

something doesn't seem right...either you are shifting like superman or the timer is off because you trapped only 108 and your 60 foot is like 1.9 ultimately but you still managed a 12.1. Nice shifting???

 

+1, Must have been the wax that helped him slice through the air to hit those times

 

Wrong forum, plus you cross-posted from Evo General. You're messing up all around.

Also, hate to break it to you, but that 12.1 isn't real either. You can't hit a 12.1 with an 8.2 1/8th mile. I know people are tired of hearing it, but I analyze timeslips all day. This is more like a 12.6-12.8 run.

 

Maybe the 1 is suppose to be a 7. 12.7

 

nope i maybe but according to all my friends and my slip its says 12.1 but i understand what ur saying. maybe it messed up on print.. if anyone wants to see, ill be more then happy to show u them..

 

I added you to the list, because you did post a time slip and have witnesses, but seriously dude, your time slips are very confusing.

 

3000ways, I wouldn't even bother. Here is why I know it's bogus. Let me type out the details from IHUNTV8's 11.6@118 timeslip vs this one:

..........IHUNTV8.....2k6
1/8th..7.50............8.23
MPH....92.2............85.0
1000'..9.75............10.76
1/4.....11.68...........12.10
MPH....118.10.........108.95

Ok, so let's break this down. It took IHUNTV8 4.18s to go from the 1/8th to the 1/4 while accelerating from 92.2 to 118.10mph. Yet, somehow 2K6 only took 3.87s to go the same distance while accelerating from 85 to 109mph. Um, no.

Now, let's break it down further. IHUNTV8 took 1.93s to go from the 1000' to the 1320' at around 110-118mph. Yet, somehow 2k6, who never went above 109mph, went the same distance in 1.34s. So, going 10mph slower, he traversed the final 320' 6/10ths faster. The timing equipment is screwed. The same thing happened on his 13.0 run, too. IT's not legit either...

 

^Your completely right, his time slip is an obvious error, there is no possible way he could have ran such a time and his first and second slip look like two completely different cars IMO. I have a solution though

 

Ill see what he runs in person next time i go to the track just so there are no confusions

 

I don't think seeing him is the problem as much as it is the timing equipment. There were others who were there and saw him, but he didn't realize the timing splits were physically impossible when he posted.

 

Come on guys, didn't you get the memo? The new IX's have a time travelling device!

J/K don't let these guys get you down.......but there is truth to their claims, the timing equipment isnt always right.......

 

I just spoke to my friend Sean who actually made 2 passes and drove his car, and it was 13.1@ 107 and 12.8@ 108 there was no pass for 12.1. Sorry Mike

 

Powned!!!!!!!