Track times evo 9
#1
Track times evo 9
Hey everyone, i just took me EVO 9 to the track tonight My first time I ran a 13.0. I ran a 12.1 at 108 my second run. Only mods I have is boost rill removed, tbe, 23psi.
Attached are my slips, and i have topns of wittness if you would like to ask.
Im 4111..On THE LEFT
Attached are my slips, and i have topns of wittness if you would like to ask.
Im 4111..On THE LEFT
Last edited by 2k6_Evo_IX; Apr 5, 2006 at 09:04 PM.
#4
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rochester NH
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by lil'evil_evo
those are some beautiful time slips lol, this is show and shine not show and tell
#5
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Wrong forum, plus you cross-posted from Evo General. You're messing up all around.
Also, hate to break it to you, but that 12.1 isn't real either. You can't hit a 12.1 with an 8.2 1/8th mile. I know people are tired of hearing it, but I analyze timeslips all day. This is more like a 12.6-12.8 run.
Also, hate to break it to you, but that 12.1 isn't real either. You can't hit a 12.1 with an 8.2 1/8th mile. I know people are tired of hearing it, but I analyze timeslips all day. This is more like a 12.6-12.8 run.
#7
nope i maybe but according to all my friends and my slip its says 12.1 but i understand what ur saying. maybe it messed up on print.. if anyone wants to see, ill be more then happy to show u them..
Trending Topics
#9
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
3000ways, I wouldn't even bother. Here is why I know it's bogus. Let me type out the details from IHUNTV8's 11.6@118 timeslip vs this one:
..........IHUNTV8.....2k6
1/8th..7.50............8.23
MPH....92.2............85.0
1000'..9.75............10.76
1/4.....11.68...........12.10
MPH....118.10.........108.95
Ok, so let's break this down. It took IHUNTV8 4.18s to go from the 1/8th to the 1/4 while accelerating from 92.2 to 118.10mph. Yet, somehow 2K6 only took 3.87s to go the same distance while accelerating from 85 to 109mph. Um, no.
Now, let's break it down further. IHUNTV8 took 1.93s to go from the 1000' to the 1320' at around 110-118mph. Yet, somehow 2k6, who never went above 109mph, went the same distance in 1.34s. So, going 10mph slower, he traversed the final 320' 6/10ths faster. The timing equipment is screwed. The same thing happened on his 13.0 run, too. IT's not legit either...
..........IHUNTV8.....2k6
1/8th..7.50............8.23
MPH....92.2............85.0
1000'..9.75............10.76
1/4.....11.68...........12.10
MPH....118.10.........108.95
Ok, so let's break this down. It took IHUNTV8 4.18s to go from the 1/8th to the 1/4 while accelerating from 92.2 to 118.10mph. Yet, somehow 2K6 only took 3.87s to go the same distance while accelerating from 85 to 109mph. Um, no.
Now, let's break it down further. IHUNTV8 took 1.93s to go from the 1000' to the 1320' at around 110-118mph. Yet, somehow 2k6, who never went above 109mph, went the same distance in 1.34s. So, going 10mph slower, he traversed the final 320' 6/10ths faster. The timing equipment is screwed. The same thing happened on his 13.0 run, too. IT's not legit either...
#10
Evolved Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Diamond Bar, California
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^Your completely right, his time slip is an obvious error, there is no possible way he could have ran such a time and his first and second slip look like two completely different cars IMO. I have a solution though
#13
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Come on guys, didn't you get the memo? The new IX's have a time travelling device!
J/K don't let these guys get you down.......but there is truth to their claims, the timing equipment isnt always right.......
J/K don't let these guys get you down.......but there is truth to their claims, the timing equipment isnt always right.......