Notices
Drag Racing Find out the best way to launch and see what kind of times other people are posting. No posting of street racing related stories!

Whats your WHP and your 1/4 track times?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:00 AM
  #1  
drewblueeye's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 352
Likes: 1
From: Sioux CIty, IA
Whats your WHP and your 1/4 track times?

I was just starting this thread to ask this:

What year is your Evo?
Is it a 8 or a 9?

What city do you live in?

What is your Dynoed WHP?
What Dyno did you have it tested on?

What are your track times?
60 foot?
1/8 mile?
1/4 mile?
MPH?

Just thought it would be nice to compare to others.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:08 AM
  #2  
Evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
Great idea...... But should probably make it more simple on 1/4 time
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:11 AM
  #3  
Evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
Car: Evo VIII
City: Cleveland,OH
Dyno WHP: Didn't dyno yet (waiting for Al's tune)
Dynometer: N/A
1/4 mile: 13.1
MPH: 104

Mods in a sig...... No tune.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:24 AM
  #4  
Smike's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,002
Likes: 12
From: somewhere testing various tires, brakes, and suspensions.
Car: 2005 Evolution 8 (GSR)
City: Detroit, MI
Dyno WHP: 320 whp (old number - just a TBE, MBC (20psi), Cone Filter, WB255)
http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k6.../SmikeDyno.jpg
Dynoed at TurboTrix, NJ - DynoJet

Track Times (added since dyno: cooler spark plugs, ACT HD, LICP)
25 peak and 100oct:
60': 1.62
1/8: 7.74
mph: 94.10
1/4: 11.931
mph: 115.96

22 peak and 93oct:
60': 1.61
1/8: 7.816
mph: 92.61
1/4: 12.135
mph: 112.92

(Added since last drag testing: ARP Head Studs, GranSport GS5 Brakes, Motul RBF600, Megan Racing Track Coil-Overs, Whiteline RB, CF Lip, HLM Tow Hooks)

Last edited by Smike; Jan 22, 2007 at 09:29 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:35 AM
  #5  
TheDriver11421's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
From: New York City
2005
Evo 8 +SSL

New York City

351whp dynojet, 313whp dyno dynamics

12.4@117
1.9 60ft (bad traction)

turboback, 264.272 cams, intake, boost controller, fuel pump, flash
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:39 AM
  #6  
Nez136's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Evo 8
Shorewood, WI
415whp@22 psi
DynoJet
60':1.88
1/4: 11.5
MPH:124@27 psi.

Can't get traction....
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:44 AM
  #7  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
05 MR
DC and Colorado Springs
310whp - Dynojet - DC (500' elevation)
300whp - Dynojet - Denver (5500' elevation)

DC
1.66
7.76 @ 88.7
12.26 @ 110.0

CoSpgs
1.72
7.82 @ 87.5
12.30 @ 107.99 (normal traps were low 109s)

TheDriver11421's traps do not look right unless he has 300-400lbs of weight reduction. Almost no way to hit only a 12.4 with a 117mph trap even on a 1.9 60', and normal weight Evos can't trap 117 with only 350whp either.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:46 AM
  #8  
mcwop23's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 9
From: Gainesville, FL
Gainesville, FL (40 degree night)
1.78
7.94@85.94
12.407@111.78

294AWHP, 279AWTQ at Stage 6 DD Dyno, 93-pump, 23PSI
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:47 AM
  #9  
TheDriver11421's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
From: New York City
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
05 MR
DC and Colorado Springs
310whp - Dynojet - DC (500' elevation)
300whp - Dynojet - Denver (5500' elevation)

DC
1.66
7.76 @ 88.7
12.26 @ 110.0

CoSpgs
1.72
7.82 @ 87.5
12.30 @ 107.99 (normal traps were low 109s)

TheDriver11421's traps do not look right unless he has 300-400lbs of weight reduction. Almost no way to hit only a 12.4 with a 117mph trap even on a 1.9 60', and normal weight Evos can't trap 117 with only 350whp either.
I have the slip and dyno sheet, i'll post it later. I actually have a similar run on you tube, where i raced turbo trix. 12.4@116 (or 115 couldnt tell)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeU2-g-AnmE

there ya go. enjoy. i got my *** beat lol.

Last edited by TheDriver11421; Jan 22, 2007 at 09:50 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:50 AM
  #10  
8UpUrV8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Evo 8
Houston 70-80*
no dyno
60': 1.89
1/4:13.1
MPH:104
full bolt ons with 280/272 hks cams

poopy mail-in tune is what I blame,
I had no boost leaks either
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:50 AM
  #11  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
I didn't say you didn't do it - I said the traps are off for that WHP and for the ET unless you have a lot of weight reduction. Notice I ran a better time at only 108mph - that just doesn't happen with only a .2s difference in 60'.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:50 AM
  #12  
EvoEntropy's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Evo 8
Houston, TX
400whp @ 23 psi
Dynapack

Running 27 psi
60':1.88
1/4: 11.7
MPH:121
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:51 AM
  #13  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by 8UpUrV8
Evo 8
Houston 70-80*
no dyno
60': 1.89
1/4:13.1
MPH:104
full bolt ons with 280/272 hks cams

poopy mail-in tune is what I blame,
I had no boost leaks either
Doesn't help without a dyno to compare - he's looking for et/mph vs dynos.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:52 AM
  #14  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
EVO8

378whp - 11.9@118 pump gas, full weight

race gas mix numbers coming soon!
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 10:03 AM
  #15  
TheDriver11421's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
From: New York City
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
I didn't say you didn't do it - I said the traps are off for that WHP and for the ET unless you have a lot of weight reduction. Notice I ran a better time at only 108mph - that just doesn't happen with only a .2s difference in 60'.
well i had full interior, so i dunno. but i was definitely beatin the crap outta my car to get those times. I wasn't even happy with the ET, i was gunning for low 12s but couldnt get good traction at the start. Dyno's dont really mean **** to me anyways, so take those number w/ a grain of salt.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:33 PM.