Whats your WHP and your 1/4 track times?
Whats your WHP and your 1/4 track times?
I was just starting this thread to ask this:
What year is your Evo?
Is it a 8 or a 9?
What city do you live in?
What is your Dynoed WHP?
What Dyno did you have it tested on?
What are your track times?
60 foot?
1/8 mile?
1/4 mile?
MPH?
Just thought it would be nice to compare to others.
What year is your Evo?
Is it a 8 or a 9?
What city do you live in?
What is your Dynoed WHP?
What Dyno did you have it tested on?
What are your track times?
60 foot?
1/8 mile?
1/4 mile?
MPH?
Just thought it would be nice to compare to others.
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,002
Likes: 12
From: somewhere testing various tires, brakes, and suspensions.
Car: 2005 Evolution 8 (GSR)
City: Detroit, MI
Dyno WHP: 320 whp (old number - just a TBE, MBC (20psi), Cone Filter, WB255)
http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k6.../SmikeDyno.jpg
Dynoed at TurboTrix, NJ - DynoJet
Track Times (added since dyno: cooler spark plugs, ACT HD, LICP)
25 peak and 100oct:
60': 1.62
1/8: 7.74
mph: 94.10
1/4: 11.931
mph: 115.96
22 peak and 93oct:
60': 1.61
1/8: 7.816
mph: 92.61
1/4: 12.135
mph: 112.92
(Added since last drag testing: ARP Head Studs, GranSport GS5 Brakes, Motul RBF600, Megan Racing Track Coil-Overs, Whiteline RB, CF Lip, HLM Tow Hooks)
City: Detroit, MI
Dyno WHP: 320 whp (old number - just a TBE, MBC (20psi), Cone Filter, WB255)
http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k6.../SmikeDyno.jpg
Dynoed at TurboTrix, NJ - DynoJet
Track Times (added since dyno: cooler spark plugs, ACT HD, LICP)
25 peak and 100oct:
60': 1.62
1/8: 7.74
mph: 94.10
1/4: 11.931
mph: 115.96
22 peak and 93oct:
60': 1.61
1/8: 7.816
mph: 92.61
1/4: 12.135
mph: 112.92
(Added since last drag testing: ARP Head Studs, GranSport GS5 Brakes, Motul RBF600, Megan Racing Track Coil-Overs, Whiteline RB, CF Lip, HLM Tow Hooks)
Last edited by Smike; Jan 22, 2007 at 09:29 AM.
05 MR
DC and Colorado Springs
310whp - Dynojet - DC (500' elevation)
300whp - Dynojet - Denver (5500' elevation)
DC
1.66
7.76 @ 88.7
12.26 @ 110.0
CoSpgs
1.72
7.82 @ 87.5
12.30 @ 107.99 (normal traps were low 109s)
TheDriver11421's traps do not look right unless he has 300-400lbs of weight reduction. Almost no way to hit only a 12.4 with a 117mph trap even on a 1.9 60', and normal weight Evos can't trap 117 with only 350whp either.
DC and Colorado Springs
310whp - Dynojet - DC (500' elevation)
300whp - Dynojet - Denver (5500' elevation)
DC
1.66
7.76 @ 88.7
12.26 @ 110.0
CoSpgs
1.72
7.82 @ 87.5
12.30 @ 107.99 (normal traps were low 109s)
TheDriver11421's traps do not look right unless he has 300-400lbs of weight reduction. Almost no way to hit only a 12.4 with a 117mph trap even on a 1.9 60', and normal weight Evos can't trap 117 with only 350whp either.
Trending Topics
05 MR
DC and Colorado Springs
310whp - Dynojet - DC (500' elevation)
300whp - Dynojet - Denver (5500' elevation)
DC
1.66
7.76 @ 88.7
12.26 @ 110.0
CoSpgs
1.72
7.82 @ 87.5
12.30 @ 107.99 (normal traps were low 109s)
TheDriver11421's traps do not look right unless he has 300-400lbs of weight reduction. Almost no way to hit only a 12.4 with a 117mph trap even on a 1.9 60', and normal weight Evos can't trap 117 with only 350whp either.
DC and Colorado Springs
310whp - Dynojet - DC (500' elevation)
300whp - Dynojet - Denver (5500' elevation)
DC
1.66
7.76 @ 88.7
12.26 @ 110.0
CoSpgs
1.72
7.82 @ 87.5
12.30 @ 107.99 (normal traps were low 109s)
TheDriver11421's traps do not look right unless he has 300-400lbs of weight reduction. Almost no way to hit only a 12.4 with a 117mph trap even on a 1.9 60', and normal weight Evos can't trap 117 with only 350whp either.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeU2-g-AnmE
there ya go. enjoy. i got my *** beat lol.
Last edited by TheDriver11421; Jan 22, 2007 at 09:50 AM.
I didn't say you didn't do it - I said the traps are off for that WHP and for the ET unless you have a lot of weight reduction. Notice I ran a better time at only 108mph - that just doesn't happen with only a .2s difference in 60'.
well i had full interior, so i dunno. but i was definitely beatin the crap outta my car to get those times. I wasn't even happy with the ET, i was gunning for low 12s but couldnt get good traction at the start. Dyno's dont really mean **** to me anyways, so take those number w/ a grain of salt.




