Top 15 Fastest/Quickest Stock Appearing Turbos for 2008...
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
I could see having a green list or a red list but I think a stock appearing list should include stock turbos too. Just my 2 cents. Personally I'd rather see separate green & red lists since they aren't the same thing anyway. I know it's more work, but it gives better refrence to each turbos potential
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
I could see having a green list or a red list but I think a stock appearing list should include stock turbos too. Just my 2 cents. Personally I'd rather see separate green & red lists since they aren't the same thing anyway. I know it's more work, but it gives better refrence to each turbos potential
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
Since there already is a fastest stock turbo list there is no reason to add them to this. I agree with the 2 separate lists for green and red turbos, but at the moment there aren't enough people interested in this list or enough times for me to do 2 lists. I have no problem doing 2 lists but there aren't enough people yet, if i get at least 8 people on here with greens and 8 with reds ill do 2 lists.
Screen Name - Date - Main sponsor - Evo Generation – Brief Sum of Setup - ET/MPH
Looks like I can get on the list!
PPI /Wayne - 8/31/008 - PPI - 04Evo8 - 2.0,Green,AEM,E85 - 11.10 @ 124.89
Looks like I can get on the list!
PPI /Wayne - 8/31/008 - PPI - 04Evo8 - 2.0,Green,AEM,E85 - 11.10 @ 124.89
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
I posted the times up there to what i thought it would look like in the correct format, obviously some changes need to be made, so when you get a chance, if you could let me know what to change/correct, thanks.
The numbers should NOT be rounded up, nor the second digit dropped. The list already contains ROUNDED numbers. Use the timeslips. I believe the PR car is a 9.59 (not just 9.5) and the mph I saw was 141.97, not 142. The track doesn't round the numbers, neither should we.
ADDED the timeslip for ease of documentation.
ADDED the timeslip for ease of documentation.
Last edited by 9sec9; Sep 3, 2008 at 09:48 AM.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
I agree, i asked raceman to correct me on the times and format. I just put the PR car up on top of the list so i don't have to do it later. Once i get the the time slip i will change it and put the correct times.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC


