Notices
Drag Racing Find out the best way to launch and see what kind of times other people are posting. No posting of street racing related stories!

Top 15 Fastest/Quickest Stock Appearing Turbos for 2008...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 2, 2008 | 10:31 PM
  #16  
06MREvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by shunderwunder
Don't forget to add the guys from the stock turbo list. After all they are stock apearing & some of them are in the 10's or low 11's.
By stock appearing i am referring to FP green or FP red equipped cars.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2008 | 10:40 PM
  #17  
shunderwunder's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta GA
Originally Posted by 06MREvo
By stock appearing i am referring to FP green or FP red equipped cars.
I could see having a green list or a red list but I think a stock appearing list should include stock turbos too. Just my 2 cents. Personally I'd rather see separate green & red lists since they aren't the same thing anyway. I know it's more work, but it gives better refrence to each turbos potential
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2008 | 10:43 PM
  #18  
RACE MAN's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: San Juan PR
Anibal BBQ Evo IX from PR did 9.5 @ 142 Allboost RED Turbo , Monroig AEM Tune, 1.42 60ft same car did 9.9 on the green at 137
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2008 | 10:49 PM
  #19  
06MREvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by shunderwunder
I could see having a green list or a red list but I think a stock appearing list should include stock turbos too. Just my 2 cents. Personally I'd rather see separate green & red lists since they aren't the same thing anyway. I know it's more work, but it gives better refrence to each turbos potential
Since there already is a fastest stock turbo list there is no reason to add them to this. I agree with the 2 separate lists for green and red turbos, but at the moment there aren't enough people interested in this list or enough times for me to do 2 lists. I have no problem doing 2 lists but there aren't enough people yet, if i get at least 8 people on here with greens and 8 with reds ill do 2 lists.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2008 | 10:51 PM
  #20  
06MREvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by RACE MAN
Anibal BBQ Evo IX from PR did 9.5 @ 142 Allboost RED Turbo , Monroig AEM Tune, 1.42 60ft same car did 9.9 on the green at 137
Yup, i saw both of those videos...badass ...if you don't mind raceman could you put the times in the correct format for me and ill add them to the list...
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2008 | 10:59 PM
  #21  
shunderwunder's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta GA
Originally Posted by 06MREvo
Since there already is a fastest stock turbo list there is no reason to add them to this. I agree with the 2 separate lists for green and red turbos, but at the moment there aren't enough people interested in this list or enough times for me to do 2 lists. I have no problem doing 2 lists but there aren't enough people yet, if i get at least 8 people on here with greens and 8 with reds ill do 2 lists.
good luck with the list(s). i know it sucks trying to set something like this up & keep it updated. I think the interest will come. It just takes a while for enough people to run across the thread.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 05:33 AM
  #22  
PPI's Avatar
PPI
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (103)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 1
From: Macomb Twp. MI
Screen Name - Date - Main sponsor - Evo Generation – Brief Sum of Setup - ET/MPH

Looks like I can get on the list!

PPI /Wayne - 8/31/008 - PPI - 04Evo8 - 2.0,Green,AEM,E85 - 11.10 @ 124.89

Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 07:30 AM
  #23  
nitz's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: MIA
Originally Posted by 06MREvo
It does seem accurate but because it is only from an ECU log i am not going to list it sorry.
no problem, i understand. however, here is my timeslip and i don't see any reason why you can't list my ET. you can just leave me out of the mph list until i get back there. you don't know the crap we have to put up with down here at the track.

Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 08:09 AM
  #24  
8thWonder's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, SC
Originally Posted by 06MREvo
Looking forward to your times Lecon ...maybe we can hit up darlington next week...
Sounds good! I've got to get DB to look at my E85 logs before I go though.

Coheterojo, get your times up mang!
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 09:07 AM
  #25  
06MREvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by RACE MAN
Anibal BBQ Evo IX from PR did 9.5 @ 142 Allboost RED Turbo , Monroig AEM Tune, 1.42 60ft same car did 9.9 on the green at 137
I posted the times up there to what i thought it would look like in the correct format, obviously some changes need to be made, so when you get a chance, if you could let me know what to change/correct, thanks.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 09:11 AM
  #26  
06MREvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
lists are updated...thanks for the time slip nitz and nice times PPI!!!
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 09:18 AM
  #27  
9sec9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma
The numbers should NOT be rounded up, nor the second digit dropped. The list already contains ROUNDED numbers. Use the timeslips. I believe the PR car is a 9.59 (not just 9.5) and the mph I saw was 141.97, not 142. The track doesn't round the numbers, neither should we.

ADDED the timeslip for ease of documentation.

Last edited by 9sec9; Sep 3, 2008 at 09:48 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 09:22 AM
  #28  
06MREvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by 9sec9
The numbers should NOT be rounded up, nor the second digit dropped. The list already contains ROUNDED numbers. Use the timeslips. I believe the PR car is a 9.59 (not just 9.5) and the mph I saw was 141.97, not 142. The track doesn't round the numbers, neither should we.
I agree, i asked raceman to correct me on the times and format. I just put the PR car up on top of the list so i don't have to do it later. Once i get the the time slip i will change it and put the correct times.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 09:24 AM
  #29  
9sec9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma
OKIX(Tony) 8/17/2008 / Forced Performance/ 06EvoIX/ 2.0, FP-Red, AEM, Import/ 10.25 ET
OKIX(Tony) 8/17/2008 / Forced Performance/ 06EvoIX/ 2.0, FP-Red, AEM, Import/ 141.67mph
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2008 | 09:46 AM
  #30  
06MREvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by 9sec9
OKIX(Tony) 8/17/2008 / Forced Performance/ 06EvoIX/ 2.0, FP-Red, AEM, Import/ 10.25 ET
OKIX(Tony) 8/17/2008 / Forced Performance/ 06EvoIX/ 2.0, FP-Red, AEM, Import/ 141.67mph
great times...thanks man...
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:55 AM.