Vannitec Evo 4 Steals the Fastest Evo 4 - 9 Record from AMS
Feb 3, 2010, 06:26 AM
#22
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rockland
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well f bodys arent used any more.NHRA prostocks run 6.60s at 200 mph and IHRA prostocks run 6.20s at 210+mph.Their 60 ft times are 0.9s or better.They ran 8s in the 70s.
Last edited by Gordian79; Feb 3, 2010 at 06:29 AM.
Feb 3, 2010, 06:30 AM
#23
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: East Coast
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't care about how fast they are now, my point is that if RWD drag cars, such as prostock fbodys that cut 1.1 or better 60's are going slower than this car at 15 mph faster, there is no way this video is legit.
I thought my point was obvious enough...
I thought my point was obvious enough...
Feb 3, 2010, 07:29 AM
#25
Evolved Member
iTrader: (75)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, this car would have to be cutting like 0.7 sec 60' times to run that speed and that mph. Most Wanted is one of the best drivers I've seen and he went 9.0@157mph and I think his 60' times are in the 1.3-1.4 range. I would agree to the comment that it might be a 1/4 km track and showing times in km/hour...or something along those lines.
Feb 3, 2010, 12:35 PM
#26
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: M104
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This reminds me of the people who claim to make 575WHP on the stock turbo and be the fastest stock turbo Evo in the world at 10.98 ET. Or the people who claim buschur racing and all of the 9 and 8 second cars they build run on a downhill track.
They have no credibility.
The car looks quick nonetheless.
They have no credibility.
The car looks quick nonetheless.
Feb 3, 2010, 08:31 PM
#30
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In their defense, you can let out of it for the last 200 feet and lose a lot of MPH and not much ET, so that is a possibility. It just didn't look like an 8.40 car to me.