Notices
DynoFlash [Visit Site]

Dyno #, 302 whp, 294 ft-lbs Tq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 06:01 PM
  #1  
V8EaterEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Florence, AZ
Mustang Dyno #'s, 302 whp, 294 ft-lbs Tq

Here it is guys and girls. Comments welcome.



This is on 91oct out here in AZ. Check my mods in my sig.
Attached Thumbnails Dyno #, 302 whp, 294 ft-lbs Tq-picture-001.jpg  

Last edited by V8EaterEvo; Dec 8, 2005 at 07:58 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 06:16 PM
  #2  
ray3328's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,477
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, NY
What kind of dyno was it on?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 06:17 PM
  #3  
V8EaterEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Florence, AZ
Mustang
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 06:25 PM
  #4  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
It seems about just what I would xpect with your mods on a mustang dyno with pump gas

This would equal about 330 on a dyno jet type dyno which is strong considering the fuel you have out there

I think with a MBC you could hold the boost better on the top end - however it looks like a smooth curve

You know its very interesting on the a/f chart as I am looking at your data log now and its the same identical curve on my a/f print out only mine is 1/2 point richer on the road

Last edited by DynoFlash; Dec 8, 2005 at 06:30 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 06:29 PM
  #5  
V8EaterEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Florence, AZ
I'm going to get a better Cat-Back, probably Bushur's. Seems to be a good one after reading his post on how company's sell bad products.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 06:30 PM
  #6  
V8EaterEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Florence, AZ
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
It seems about just what I would xpect with your mods on a mustang dyno with pump gas

This would equal about 330 on a dyno jet type dyno which is strong considering the fuel you have out there

I think with a MBC you could hold the boost better on the top end - however it looks like a smooth curve
What do you think about the A/F Ratio?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 06:31 PM
  #7  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by V8EaterEvo
I'm going to get a better Cat-Back, probably Bushur's. Seems to be a good one after reading his post on how company's sell bad products.
remeinding me of the tiny hole in your rear muffler then I think the power is excelent as a full 3" exhuats would prob net you another 10 whp at leats
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 06:33 PM
  #8  
V8EaterEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Florence, AZ
I'm thinking the same thing.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 06:37 PM
  #9  
V8EaterEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Florence, AZ
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
remeinding me of the tiny hole in your rear muffler then I think the power is excelent as a full 3" exhuats would prob net you another 10 whp at leats
What do you think about my intake? I have the Power Enterprise one. Do you think I could get more out of an HKS one?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 06:49 PM
  #10  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
The intake is fine

better octane and a better exhuast is the problems
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 06:54 PM
  #11  
V8EaterEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Florence, AZ
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
The intake is fine

better octane and a better exhuast is the problems
Cool, those can be fixed. I'm going to start running octane booter from now on. Will this effect the tune at all?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 06:54 PM
  #12  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
No, don't run octane booster man. Either use alky or race gas.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 07:04 PM
  #13  
V8EaterEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Florence, AZ
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
No, don't run octane booster man. Either use alky or race gas.
I'm going to get a new cat-back and alky kit. But until I do, I'm going to do the octane booster. I should be getting the alky kit after x-mas. I'll have to get it re-tune for the alky, but I'll just take a few days off work so I can mail it back to Al to retune it.

If I run 26 psi with the Alky kit and better cat-back, I'll be well over 350 whp. What do you think?

Forever
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 07:20 PM
  #14  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
I think you ask too many questions, but yes, your car should make over 350whp (Dynojet).

Perhaps you should try using your cam gears?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 07:28 PM
  #15  
SlowCar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 0
From: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Try to avoid octane boosters, they have organometallics like MMT, not good for O2 sensors
Originally Posted by V8EaterEvo
Cool, those can be fixed. I'm going to start running octane booter from now on. Will this effect the tune at all?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:06 PM.