I am kind of excited about this car as it is the first car I tuned at my new dyno facility - ICS
This car was a Stage II or III with stock fmic and cosworth cams on 93 octane pump gas
I really enjoyed being back on a dyno jet - this is the same one I have worked with several times at Top Speed in ATL and I ran it totally uncorrected
Its nice to have a even yard stick that "is what it is"
This car was a Stage II or III with stock fmic and cosworth cams on 93 octane pump gas
I really enjoyed being back on a dyno jet - this is the same one I have worked with several times at Top Speed in ATL and I ran it totally uncorrected
Its nice to have a even yard stick that "is what it is"
Evolved Member
Quote:
Its nice to have a even yard stick that "is what it is"
u had the same option at the Shop. but if customers started to see uncorrected numbers on the DD they would commit suicide!!!! Originally Posted by DynoFlash
Its nice to have a even yard stick that "is what it is"
nice setup... do you have before and after?
Evolved Member
Isn't SAE corrected more accurate though? I thought uncorrected numbers read higher.....
Evolving Member
once again AL thanks for everything 
car pulls really strong!
my last tune was @ the shop -> 327whp @ 22psi (dyno dynamics) = bad gas & my a/f was alittle rich.
today AL did 2 baseline pulls before he retuned my car it made 310whp @ 22psi
so im guessing that ics dynojet reads lower compare to the shop's dyno dynamics
anyway with new plugs, good gas and better a/f ratio my final run = 340whp/339wtq (30whp more)
car pulls really strong!my last tune was @ the shop -> 327whp @ 22psi (dyno dynamics) = bad gas & my a/f was alittle rich.
today AL did 2 baseline pulls before he retuned my car it made 310whp @ 22psi
so im guessing that ics dynojet reads lower compare to the shop's dyno dynamics
anyway with new plugs, good gas and better a/f ratio my final run = 340whp/339wtq (30whp more)
Evolved Member
Quote:
car pulls really strong!
my last tune was @ the shop -> 327whp @ 22psi (dyno dynamics) = bad gas & my a/f was alittle rich.
today AL did 2 baseline pulls before he retuned my car it made 310whp @ 22psi
so im guessing that ics dynojet reads lower compare to the shop's dyno dynamics
anyway with new plugs, good gas and better a/f ratio my final run = 340whp/339wtq
Originally Posted by EVOIX2NV
once again AL thanks for everything car pulls really strong!my last tune was @ the shop -> 327whp @ 22psi (dyno dynamics) = bad gas & my a/f was alittle rich.
today AL did 2 baseline pulls before he retuned my car it made 310whp @ 22psi
so im guessing that ics dynojet reads lower compare to the shop's dyno dynamics
anyway with new plugs, good gas and better a/f ratio my final run = 340whp/339wtq
well it all depends what correction they were using on the DD. 1.10... 1.15... 1.17.... 1.175...
it doesn't matter now... you got a baseline and then after the cams and tune you gained 30whp which is pretty impressive...
your car must feel great... you have max power from almost 6000rpm until ~7200rpm when you stopped the pull...
Evolving Member
Quote:
it doesn't matter now... you got a baseline and then after the cams and tune you gained 30whp which is pretty impressive...
your car must feel great... you have max power from almost 6000rpm until ~7200rpm when you stopped the pull...
yup car feels great! thanks Originally Posted by kouzman
well it all depends what correction they were using on the DD. 1.10... 1.15... 1.17.... 1.175...it doesn't matter now... you got a baseline and then after the cams and tune you gained 30whp which is pretty impressive...
your car must feel great... you have max power from almost 6000rpm until ~7200rpm when you stopped the pull...
Quote:
nice setup... do you have before and after?
No I just started tuning - if you like you are welcome to come down anytime for a free pull on the dyno jet to see how much power its pulling Originally Posted by kouzman
u had the same option at the Shop. but if customers started to see uncorrected numbers on the DD they would commit suicide!!!! nice setup... do you have before and after?
Al
Quote:
Uncorected is the actual power Originally Posted by midwestmonster
Isn't SAE corrected more accurate though? I thought uncorrected numbers read higher.....
The corrections are designed to level out variations in air temps and pressure on the dyno power production
The problem is that most of the standard corrections were designed for normally aspirated cars
Using SAE made the numbers a bit higher - I just left it uncorected
Al
Quote:
car pulls really strong!
my last tune was @ the shop -> 327whp @ 22psi (dyno dynamics) = bad gas & my a/f was alittle rich.
today AL did 2 baseline pulls before he retuned my car it made 310whp @ 22psi
so im guessing that ics dynojet reads lower compare to the shop's dyno dynamics
anyway with new plugs, good gas and better a/f ratio my final run = 340whp/339wtq (30whp more)
Thanks I appreciate your business - thanks for taking time to post about your expierience.Originally Posted by EVOIX2NV
once again AL thanks for everything car pulls really strong!my last tune was @ the shop -> 327whp @ 22psi (dyno dynamics) = bad gas & my a/f was alittle rich.
today AL did 2 baseline pulls before he retuned my car it made 310whp @ 22psi
so im guessing that ics dynojet reads lower compare to the shop's dyno dynamics
anyway with new plugs, good gas and better a/f ratio my final run = 340whp/339wtq (30whp more)
Newbie
Thanks for the tune Al
car feels really good for a stock 05 motor
ICS facility and staff were great
would definitly do business again
also awesome work on the white evo 9 today
car feels really good for a stock 05 motor
ICS facility and staff were great
would definitly do business again
also awesome work on the white evo 9 today
Thanks man - I appreciate your business
Thanks for posting the nice pics and video
Al
Al
