# 3 most active poster and rising !
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
# 3 most active poster and rising !
If you add up my posts under Alfriedesq and Dynoflash - I have the # 3 most posts on the forum and both of those names are in the top 15
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/me...ers&perpage=25
Sorry - my car is at the shop and i have nothing better to do tonight but lurk around the evo m forums
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/me...ers&perpage=25
Sorry - my car is at the shop and i have nothing better to do tonight but lurk around the evo m forums
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally posted by MalibuJack
Woah.. I'm up there too.. BTW you still gonna do the UTEC tuning?
Woah.. I'm up there too.. BTW you still gonna do the UTEC tuning?
Its a great unit - vastly suerior to other piggy back solutiuons
Its good if you want to be able to play around yourself - it works very well
We are also selling the Uflash for $79.99 whoch works in conjucntion with the UTEC to remove the fuel limiter, rev limit and smooth out the fuel curves for easier tuning
Its a nice product - however there is no performance advantage over a reflash, the sole advantage is the tunability which can be a blessing or a curse
The only bad thing I have found is that the ign timing control requires you to default to UTEC knock control which IMHO can be a dangerous thing compared to the uncanny stock knock sensor
Agsin in certain applications control ove the factory knock may be desired - however - IMHO - I would prefer to leave the facstory ecu knock protection function FULLY intact and operational. We are able to get very decent results and smooth power with that knock function 100% in full force. IMHO - its going to be hard to 2nd guess
on the knock retard settings that they have on the stock ecu
Thats the plan.. If it wasn't for the frequency that i change things around, and make adjustments, I would have to say the DynoFlash would have been my preferred choice.. I've already changed my configuration 3 times in the past year requiring completely different tuning..
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally posted by MalibuJack
Thats the plan.. If it wasn't for the frequency that i change things around, and make adjustments, I would have to say the DynoFlash would have been my preferred choice.. I've already changed my configuration 3 times in the past year requiring completely different tuning..
Thats the plan.. If it wasn't for the frequency that i change things around, and make adjustments, I would have to say the DynoFlash would have been my preferred choice.. I've already changed my configuration 3 times in the past year requiring completely different tuning..
A slightly lower cost senario would be the through the mail flash - fine adjusted with the UTEC - but with the Dyno flash ignition control, mainating the stock knock operation, on pump gas - - and then a wild C-16 race map on the utec for the track
Sure its a bit more costly - but you would get all the reliability, smoothness and protection of the stock ecu and also the ability to get max performance at the turn of a switch
Us evo guys are very lucky as there are many ecu tuning options availble right off the bat - where as with my WRX there was very limited tuning options for well over the first year
With only limited evo numbers in the usa - soon there will be more ecu options than cars!!!!!
UTEC is one of my favorites - but it is geared towards a more "hands on" owner who is embarking on an educational path to discover how to tune the car - - that can be a lot of fun or a real nightmare depending on your perference



