Notices
DynoFlash [Visit Site]

Big Al's Car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 07:55 AM
  #16  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally posted by DXL007
Bump
I will be posting up a list in a few days as soon as I can find like two hours typing time !
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 12:31 PM
  #17  
DXL007's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Jax, FL
Can't wait... After over 1000 reads seems I'm not the only one who wants to know!
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 12:48 PM
  #18  
4-BNGR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
I can do it quickly

1) AEM EMS ($1,600 - $2,000)
2) 3" Turbo Back Exhaust ($800 - $900)
3) Turbo Upgrade Kit ($3,000 - $5,000) * GT35R
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 12:59 PM
  #19  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally posted by 4-BNGR
I can do it quickly

1) AEM EMS ($1,600 - $2,000)
2) 3" Turbo Back Exhaust ($800 - $900)
3) Turbo Upgrade Kit ($3,000 - $5,000) * GT35R
keep typing !
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 01:12 PM
  #20  
4-BNGR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
The criteria was everyday 500hp. #1&2 give 300whp on a "rough" tune. 320 should not be a problem with a proper tune. (What the conversion on the Evo from wheel to crank? 320whp is about 380- 390 crank hp ) So 120- 130 crank hp to go. Turbo upgrade "kit" (fmic, injectors, fuel pump,..)utilizing the GT35R turbo surely can make up the 120-130 hp difference and yield a 500 hp car.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 04:18 PM
  #21  
bahamut's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
From: TB, FL
Daily driving 10 sec car? That's not really feasible.

You're going to use a really big TC for top end pull; for the street, it'll become a dog to power up slow. Besides, you're going to need a rollcage; if you have a spouse, she's not going to look too kindly at housing the kids with the rollcage.

Look at these cars w/ 10 sec possibilty - a viper w/ a blower, a tubed out foxbody 'stang w/ a blower, a toyo starlet, RX-3's, and etc . . . which are them are pratical on the streets?
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 04:22 PM
  #22  
zupber4930's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
Originally posted by bahamut
Daily driving 10 sec car? That's not really feasible.

You're going to use a really big TC for top end pull; for the street, it'll become a dog to power up slow. Besides, you're going to need a rollcage; if you have a spouse, she's not going to look too kindly at housing the kids with the rollcage.

Look at these cars w/ 10 sec possibilty - a viper w/ a blower, a tubed out foxbody 'stang w/ a blower, a toyo starlet, RX-3's, and etc . . . which are them are pratical on the streets?
Actually it can be done...has been done...several times I might add, and btw...it's box body 'stang. As far as being a dog to power up slow....they actually work just fine. Just ask AMS, Dynoflash, and many of the other tuners that have 500+ EVO's...most of them are daily drivers.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 04:40 PM
  #23  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
Hmm.. Its indeed a FOX body... the FOX platform was used on the Mustang III (Boxy body) Ford Fairmont, Thunderbird since 1979, etc.. But not picking nits.. I **HAVE** a 10 second supercharged malibu, and although I could drive the car everyday if I wanted to, its certainly not the most pleasant car to drive daily.

And I do have to agree about the turbo.. We're forgetting that the LAG you experience will affect getting peak torque at lower RPM's.. But if you look at all the HP/Torque plots and overlay them onto a stock graph, although the bigger turbo takes longer to spool, the power levels at the lower RPM's are very close, if not better than the power of the stock engine in that approximate range.. What does that mean? Well, you end up with a very quick car with a big turbo, but drivability isnt all that much different than the stock.. Its only that the jump in horsepower isn't evident until the bigger turbo is breathing fully.. I don't really see it being a huge downside..

Thats not to say I'm a proponent of a huge turbo upgrade, I personally think that most are neglecting the potential of the twin scroll design and the stock turbo, especially for a daily driver.

But I do think that 10 seconds and reasonable drivability are possible in this car.. But it will certainly be expensive.. Making horsepower and going fast isn't all that expensive.. a big enough turbo, fuel, and(if needed) bottle, can in theory do it.. But its the reliability of the parts when brought to that threshold that becomes the factor.. What good is running a 10 second quarter, if you only scatter parts everywhere on the next run? Thats where the need to build expensive blueprinted engines, and fabricate/upgrade chassis and drivetrain parts..

Just my POV..
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 04:43 PM
  #24  
zupber4930's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
It's very possible that I am wrong on the mustang...I'm not much of an american muscle fan. I have always heard of people refering to it as a "box" body. If I really am wrong....I apologize.

I'll still stand by my "10sec daily driver" word. It's totally possible.

As far as the lag...didn't forget that....just that it doesn't have to be slow....the engine CAN have a lot of work done to it don't forget that! >=O)
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 04:51 PM
  #25  
nonmature's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
I think it is feasible but I doubt many will go through with the actually work. Buschur ran 11.65 on stock turbo no nitrous I'm sure with a good driver and a turbo upgrade alone ( HKS 3037 which shouldnt sacrifice reliability too much) you could shave off .65 with nitrous no problem.... buschur stage 4 is around 4000 I think turbo upgrade depending on where you get it would be what 3-5K thats a 7-9K price tag so I would think it is possible for around 10 grand.

famous quotes of the day "speed costs money how fast you want to go" and "I'll make your car fast no matter what it costs you"

-non
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 04:52 PM
  #26  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
Not disagreeing with you, just giving it my perspective.. I could drive my 10 second malibu every day.. but sometimes too much power is a bit scary (and dangerous) on our roads.. 300hp in the rain can get you sideways, just imagine 700 on dry pavement doing that every time you lay into it?

The most horsepower isn't always a winner on the street.. AWD does raise the bar a bit though..
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 04:53 PM
  #27  
nonmature's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Originally posted by MalibuJack
Not disagreeing with you, just giving it my perspective.. I could drive my 10 second malibu every day.. but sometimes too much power is a bit scary (and dangerous) on our roads.. 300hp in the rain can get you sideways, just imagine 700 on dry pavement doing that every time you lay into it?

The most horsepower isn't always a winner on the street.. AWD does raise the bar a bit though..
and you can also turn down boost a bit on the street...

-non
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 04:56 PM
  #28  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
Ahh, the advantage of a turbo.. (I have a supercharged 383 small block in the car now, been building a 427cid small block for a Banks twin-turbo setup for that EXACT reason)
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 05:01 PM
  #29  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
You also hear stories about guys who spend tens of thousands on a car to be built up, and never break into the 10's, and some other guy out of nowhere steps up and runs a 10.90 or better and has less than 10k invested.. What does he have? Time and effort spent in carefully planning his approach and letting others make the mistakes... I'm curious to see which approach does it this year.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 05:08 PM
  #30  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally posted by MalibuJack
Not disagreeing with you, just giving it my perspective.. I could drive my 10 second malibu every day.. but sometimes too much power is a bit scary (and dangerous) on our roads.. 300hp in the rain can get you sideways, just imagine 700 on dry pavement doing that every time you lay into it?

The most horsepower isn't always a winner on the street.. AWD does raise the bar a bit though..
my idea is a car which handles in the rain, snow and any driving condition - but which can eat most chevy drag cars even on the strip - - something that has lots of power and which is still well balanced - something like the norris evo vii

Why sit back and take ideas from others when most of the fun is in developing your own ideas and seeing which ones work and which don't ? Its through the process of trial and error that I learn the most and a lot of the times the errors tell me more than not
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:57 PM.