Notices
E85 / Ethanol This section is dedicated to tuning with ethanol.

Ethanol to go by-by? Or just more expensive?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 04:50 PM
  #1  
Ryan.Kauz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
From: Your mamy's bedroom
Ethanol to go by-by? Or just more expensive?

Reduced Ethanol Blender’s Credit Headed For Senate Vote

http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/201...r-senate-vote/


What say you, should the American taxpayer be on the hook to subsidize Ethanol production and sales?

$0.46 per gallon? $0.36 per gallon? Or $0.00 per gallon?


If the blender's credit is cut, Ethanol production in this country will cease.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2010 | 05:23 AM
  #2  
whtrice's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 58
From: Sacramento
No..It won't cease.. We will just make our own. Until the gov decides to fawk with that too.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2010 | 05:57 AM
  #3  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
Interesting. I've been hesitant to invest in a bigger fuel system for E85 because I'm worried that it's not here to stay.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2010 | 06:56 AM
  #4  
bbyevo8u's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 2
From: NY
that sux, the gas station down the block from me started selling e85
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2010 | 07:11 AM
  #5  
buchnerj's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 2
From: the burgh, pa
Ethanol is the fuel of the future. Soon most cars and vehicles will run on ethanol out of necessity. Fossil fuels are only going to be around for so long, There is a huge demand for an alternative fuel source and ethanol right now seems to be the front runner. The main product (corn, although other sources can be used.) is easily grown in the heartlands of the US, and now we mix in some fossil fuels, but it is possible to use very low percentages of regular gasoline in an ethanol blend. For example, many on the forum here run E-98 in their car at the track, etc.

I am not only saying this because I want to keep the E-85 in my car now, but because ceasing production now will only be bad for the long term growth and research of the fuel. It is better for the environment than normal gasoline which is a big plus. Research today says that each BTU of energy to produce a BTU of gasoline, could produce 8 BTU of ethanol. So while it takes 30% more ethanol to have the same energy output as an equal aliquot of gasoline, you are still ahead of the curve in terms of production energy. Cost effective, long term reliability, better for the environment.

If the process of manufacturing ethanol could be streamlined, and those vehicles and refinement steps could be re-designed to need less energy then it would be an ever better solution.

Read up: http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center-article_46/
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2010 | 07:16 AM
  #6  
StreetThisEvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 1
From: Barbertucky, OH
It's not going anywhere.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2010 | 07:34 AM
  #7  
evolution2186's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Springfield
When the consumer buys it, it will not leave. I have 5 local station in Springfield, Missouri now. We use a lot of Ethanol here and I believe it's here to stay.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2010 | 08:28 AM
  #8  
bigben's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 926
Likes: 1
From: Boaz, AL
There are only 13 E85 pumps in Alabama so far, and the closest one is 17 miles away. The rest of them are over an hour away. I'd make the conversion if they'd make more pumps available. As for now, i'm SOL.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 10:23 AM
  #9  
Ryan.Kauz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
From: Your mamy's bedroom
It makes sense that there is more Ethanol availability in the mid-west. Its heavily subsidized and has a very short shelf life (30-60 days), therefore its difficult to distribute to a nationwide chain.

Guess I should chip in that there are about 10-15 stations in the entire state of WA with E89, its not easy to find.

Arguments that its here to stay ignore some basic principals:

1) It takes more energy to produce than it contains (net negative)
2) It uses massive quantities of water during production
3) increases food prices disproportionately due to lost product to ethanol production
4) Obviously the market will not support this product, is it in our best interest to subsidize this industry in perpetuity? (Farm lobbiests unite! Oh wait, they already have) Would this product sell if its price was reflective of its true cost? (ie: $0.20-0.30 per gallon more expensive than gasoline)
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 10:34 AM
  #10  
evodood's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: cali
Originally Posted by bigben
There are only 13 E85 pumps in Alabama so far, and the closest one is 17 miles away. The rest of them are over an hour away. I'd make the conversion if they'd make more pumps available. As for now, i'm SOL.
My closest station is 7 miles away, however I only fill up there 50% of the time. The next closest station is 26 miles away which I visit the other 50% of the time, because my local station owner at times likes to over charge by 30 cents a gallon.

17 miles is not that big of a deal unless your weekly commute is long. Just Do It. LOL
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 10:48 AM
  #11  
Ryan.Kauz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
From: Your mamy's bedroom
Originally Posted by evodood
My closest station is 7 miles away, however I only fill up there 50% of the time. The next closest station is 26 miles away which I visit the other 50% of the time, because my local station owner at times likes to over charge by 30 cents a gallon.

17 miles is not that big of a deal unless your weekly commute is long. Just Do It. LOL
that 17 miles represents approximately 2 gallons of fuel. Is it worth ~$5.50 per tank and nearly 40 minutes of either your free time or billable time per tank of gas?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 10:54 AM
  #12  
L888Apex's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 72
From: West Coast Yo
We have been having trouble trying to get more e85 pumps in socal I think we only have about 10 in all of socal but it seems that 1-2 pumps get added every year but that 's too damn slow!!!!The nearest pump to me is about 8 miles away and the next one to that one is about 50 miles so it's not convenient whatsoever at this time, unless you live in san diego county which has 3-4 pumps.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 10:58 AM
  #13  
gsrboi80's Avatar
Evolved Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Liked
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,909
Likes: 47
From: On a cliff
I think we have like 2 in all of NJ. Closest one is like a 40 min drive so not an option for me at this point.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 11:18 AM
  #14  
Jim in Tucson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 2
From: Tucson, Arizona, USA
Originally Posted by l888apex
The nearest pump to me is about 8 miles away...
I've got one pump 8 miles away and I've been running only E85 since July '08. You can do it. It is a little inconvenient, but not impossible. Would I prefer an E85 pump at every gas station? You betcha'. I'd love to be able to see an E85 station from my house just like Sarah Palin.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 11:34 AM
  #15  
goodhart's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Isanti, MN
Damn I love living in MN sometimes. Land of E85
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:21 PM.