It not the smoothing... it's the size of the lines...

 

Mike meant to say 235whp and 245wtrq not 335whp/345wtrq.

 

we made with a dyno fash very good power on my car hks exhaust,mbc,drop in K&N 375awhp/100 octane.

 

what boost?


And Max I would be interested in that map for comparison since the tune is for 104 I really couldn't use it as base. $$$??

 

21.5 .

 

Your set up is just a little different than stock reading your sig.

 

thats was when i first got my evo now its a monter

 

Thanks for the response Jason

Girlie

 

hell yah max, thats why you pulled on mike!!

 

no it was on a dynojet i believe all i know is that it a acual awd dyno....

 

I was inquiring about the AMS dyno, not the Mynes. AMS has a dynojet as stated in this thread, which is the reason why the other person reported higher numbers with similar mods. Mustang dynos are known to read lower than Dynojet dynos.

 

Those are some nice #'s for a stock 9.

 

Ya the size of the lines could be cause for concern but if you look at the data on the bottom of the dyno sheet it backs up what the lines are already saying so I'm not too terribly concerened about either the thickness or the smoothing of the lines.

Also, at least what I've ever seen on a Mustang Dyno, anything below a smoothing filter of 75 is never noticable from the car owners perspective. I think the difference in the lines being as smooth as they are would be negligable to say the least from 99 to 75.

But that just an opinion of mine. Good numbers Guys

 

Side note: What car did you run 112 in makeing 280 on a mustang dyno??

 

Clarification: the 112 is in reference to the temperature here in Arizona. The 104 is the octane of the fuel used. The actual temp inside the shop is actually lower since we have a giant fan blowing while the car is on the dyno.