Notices
ECU Flash

You & Your Wideband & Evoscan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 27, 2007 | 11:18 AM
  #16  
evobeatsti's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
good thread i am in the market for a wideband
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2007 | 11:49 AM
  #17  
jfitzpat's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by InsaneEvolution
Do I put the wideband before the cat or can I put it in after the cat?
*ALL* UEGO sensor based widebands should ideally be placed before the CAT. You can read a little bit about how the sensors work here. Put simply, the sensor relies on hydrocarbons to make measurements rich of stoichiometric (where you normally go WOT) and excess O2 to make measurements lean of stoichiometric. A modern 3 way cat tries to remove hydrocarbons, which will alter the readings.

The rear narrow band sensor in most vehicles is there to monitor this removal of hydrocarbons, not lambda (AFR). How much readings are affected will vary with cat efficiency. The lean shift will generally be greatest near stoich and drop off as you move away from stoich and cat efficiency plummets, but the actual amount is hard to predict. Errors in the .2-.3 AFR range (.020 lambda) are common.

-jjf
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2007 | 05:37 PM
  #18  
Ralph's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
From: N/A
Originally Posted by jfitzpat
I'm not sure I follow the math on this. An SSI-4 is about $100 and provides four inputs which can be used for voltage, frequency, RPM, etc. and are suitable for boost sensor.

An LMA-3 is $200, but provides five inputs and includes the MAP sensor and two axis of accel (for better road dyno numbers).

We actually sell the LC-1 w/SSI-4 for $299. This is $20 more than a Zeitronix unit, but the SSI-4 can take RPM from ignition sources, the inputs can be repurposed, etc. and the LC-1 itself is a dramatically faster instrument. But even buying the pieces individually, I don't see how you came up with 300+.

-jjf
It was a rough estimate based on the prices I've saw at Innovatives website.

I was referring to Boost AND Exhaust temperature

LMA-3 Multi-sensor Device (AuxBox) $249. in addition to the LC-1 $199


Zeitronix does all of this out of the box.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 12:08 AM
  #19  
Inprogress's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Just for everyone's info, you can get the LC-1 wideband from ebay for around 170 shipped, that's where i got mine from and that included usps 2-3 day shipping too.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 05:16 AM
  #20  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
I paid $180 for Lc1 from StripperMotorsports. They sold me the kit that comes without the sensor - bastards. Over the phone he said it was the complete kit, serial, controller, sensor and all. I had to instal it in a hurry so I didn't have time to send it back I got stripped

I had to purchace the Bosch seperatly for another $80

Don't every trust a vendor with borderline underaged strippers covering the ir web page lol

Last edited by C6C6CH3vo; Feb 28, 2007 at 05:18 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 07:31 AM
  #21  
jfitzpat's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ralph
It was a rough estimate based on the prices I've saw at Innovatives website.

I was referring to Boost AND Exhaust temperature

LMA-3 Multi-sensor Device (AuxBox) $249. in addition to the LC-1 $199


Zeitronix does all of this out of the box.
Ah, I see the confusion. No, it is not equivelent. The LMA-3 includes a 3 bar map sensor, two axis of accel measurement, a thermocouple input and wire, and etc., all built in.

If you need analog inputs to tack into existing sensors (ala Zeitronix), you just need an SSI-4. SSI-4+LC-1 is $299.

-jjf
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 08:21 PM
  #22  
mac_05evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Originally Posted by Mr. Evo IX
1) AEM Uego

2) Plug and Play install, routed o2 sensor through factory o2 sensor hole in passenger side floor panel (tight fit to push the AEM through with the factory wire running in there). I added an o2 bung and run a total of 3 o2's front / rear w/CEL fix / wideband.

3) Had to make serial cable and use serial to USB converter because my laptop doesnt have a serial port to log in evoscan. Used existing serial cable and cut end off and connected 2 wires. Note instructions are for a male connector but you will be attaching a female connector so make sure you do the right pins. Check continuity if you use a serial cable to make sure you have the right wires.

4) Seems accurate. I dont have another one to check the accuracy of this one.

5) Have only had it installed for 2 months. Looks nice and works.

6) None yet. Not compatible with mitsulogger yet.
I just got my AEM UEGO and haven't tried logging the AFs yet in Evoscan. Is making the serial cable you described the easiest way to connect it or is there something easier I can do? Does anyone sell the cable that you made?
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 09:22 PM
  #23  
subaruwrx420's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by Ralph
1) Innovative LC-1
2) Pretty easy to set up, took a couple hours to route the wires etc
3) Plug it in and go..
..
Did you find good install instructions? I'm going to install mine this weekend. I plan on routing the wire through the pass side fire wall hole that leads to the glovebox. Any good wires to use in there? Grounds? I'm going to wire in the led with the push button so I can easily calibrate it and determine if there is a problem. I did it when had the Subaru, it was a pain in the ***, but I drilled two holes below the center vent for the led and push button. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 05:07 AM
  #24  
mac_05evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Originally Posted by mac_05evo
I just got my AEM UEGO and haven't tried logging the AFs yet in Evoscan. Is making the serial cable you described the easiest way to connect it or is there something easier I can do? Does anyone sell the cable that you made?
..
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 05:51 AM
  #25  
Stealth Ag's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Jeanette near Pittsburgh
IS there any reason that i cant pull my factory downstream O2 sensor and use the bung to place my wideband? Then simply place a "simulator" on my factory o2


I dont have a cat btw.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 06:02 AM
  #26  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
A simulator only simulates the narrowband signal's output, In order to completely remove the stock O2 sensor, you'd have to create a simulated load on the heater circuit so you don't throw a CEL. It can and has been done before, but the resistor required to do it would generate alot of heat and can burn stuff that it comes in contact with. I saw several posts about how this is done over the years.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 06:11 AM
  #27  
Stealth Ag's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Jeanette near Pittsburgh
but since i dont have a cat there wouldnt be a problem with placing the 02 sensor there?

my downpipe/catdelete is coated, i dont really wanna drill a hole in it to place the wideband, but if i could put it in the cat-back secition of the exhaust it would make life easier.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 06:14 AM
  #28  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
Yeah you could put it there.. Location isn't as much of an issue as long as its not in a location that it can get damaged.. Its preferrable to be slightly closer (somewhere in the downpipe) but not too close to the turbo.

FWIW a common misconception about the catalytic converter is that you can't tune with a wideband after it.. You can, but have to be aware of the affect it has on the AFR's after the cat.. But this doesn't apply to you because you don't have one.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 06:24 AM
  #29  
Stealth Ag's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Jeanette near Pittsburgh
Thanks, So this is what i have extrapolated from this thread, Ill update the first post unless someone has objections:

AEM UEGO
1) Nice Gauge Included
2) Laptop Interface requires some fabrication
3)No Bung Kit Included

Zextronic Products
1) 5v Output allows versitility
2) Includes Serial Output

Innovative
1)Cheapest option, (not sure which Model)
2) Avalable with or without gauge options
3) easiest set up, so long as your computer has a serial port.


any comments?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 06:33 AM
  #30  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
All 3 have both serial and Analog 5v outputs

All 3 have bung kits included

AEM has a gauge built in (if you got the Gauge type UEGO)

Zeitronix package includes the display box if you ordered a package kit. It also has other sensors and inputs you can log (Mitsulogger includes all of the sensor inputs, Evoscan doesn't as far as I've read)

Innovate was the least expensive unless you want the gauge, Logworks software is fantastic, and its additional logging components are flexible and designed to be modular.

Installation on all three for basic AFR is more or less the same, and pretty easy. The complexity goes up as you have to deal with difficult wiring harnesses to run through the firewall, and additional sensors..
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:23 PM.