Yousure?

 

what type of gas is used? does anyone really look pay attention to EGT's anymore? i thought anything above 900C was bad?

 

edit.

 

Yep. Compare the request IDs in evoscan and mitsulogger for the low and high fuel trims. In prior versions of evoscan they were reversed.

 

93 octane

 

I guess its real bad if it occurs over a long time. For me its only there for a momemnt.

 

What things cause high EGTs?

 

Your dll numbers are too optimistic due to lack of correct temp humidity and baro condition. You do know that 60* C translates to 140* F No wonder your getting those high hp and tq numbers. And to make matters worse you are using a correction factor on ONE run. Correction factors are used when you compare TWO runs to keep weather variables constant.

I know you said that this is the way you did it before, yet you do not post a before and after overlay in DLL.

Please post a more realistic dyno chart.

 

Any chart made by a program will not be realistic, duh! I never said those are my acutal poewer numbers, lol.

My last dyno was 330hp/330tq on a mustang dyno in 90degree temps, before i had the FMIC,Cam settings, Ignition amplifier, Ported Manifold, 3 Inch DP, Catch cans, tune.

Many you can hate.

I told you i know the temps are wrong, but this is reference to the previous dll which was 390/360.

Dont hate cuz.

 

No one is hating, but there is a proper way and an improper way to use DLL. The way you are using it inflates the numbers beyond any relevant value. If you want to use DLL for ONE dyno run, then you will have to use the correct temps, humidity, baro and areodynamics. The areodynmaics numbers are not listed in the evo definition file. You will have to figure those out on your own.

Another way to use it is not to mess with any of the nubmers and post TWO dyno chrarts using the overlay feature of DLL. That will show you the gains after you did your tune and only your tune.

You don NOT do any of these two approaches. You just use the approach that gives you the inflated numbers and you want us to believe that your car is putting 419 hp.

Your Mustang dyno numbers of 330 are accurate, but your 419 numbers on DLL are OVERLY inflated.

 

Looks good to me. Don't raise the boost up anymore though, your @ 93% IDC already.

 

I see in the full log that he is maxing out at just over 20 on the IPW. What is the max IPW/IDC?

 

Once again im not saying those are my numbers. Im tryin to explain the gain over the previous run. I DO NOT know the uncorrected numbers from the previous graph that is why im using the same settings to show the gain over the previous one.
If i find the log for the previos run i will post the numbers with the SAME temp used here just diff PRessure and Humidty. Actual real world temps were 47F first run and 63F this time. Pressure was 101 and the same roughly this time. Humidty was 40 % the fusrt time and 73 this time.

SO ONCE AGAIN......I AM NOT SAYING THESE ARE MY ACUTAL NUMBERS........

JUST THE GAIN DUE TO TUNING, IGNITION AMP, 3 INCH DP AND CATCH CAN.

and BTW i am close to 350Hp Mustang dyno or 400HP on a dynojet.

 

Do explain ur calculation for that? You can PM me if you don't mind

 

for a 4 cyl 4 stroke engine = (RPMxIDC)/1200