Notices
ECU Flash

Tuning for 0 knock, having an issue with one area

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 08:04 PM
  #1  
Slo_crx1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 821
Likes: 1
From: Simpson, PA
Tuning for 0 knock, having an issue with one area

I've been refining my tune when time allows (and when my datalogger allows lol) and lately I've been having an issue with one area of my map. I'm trying to shoot for 0 knock in any portion of the map, but I have one spot in particular that's giving me a hard time. Right around 2190rpm's I have 2 counts of knock pop up, and by 4027rpm's it's sitting at 3 counts then goes away. According to my logs, my timing sits at 10* when it shows 2 counts, then jumps up for some reason to 17*. I can't find 17* anywhere on my timing maps for that load percentage (only at 111.2% at the time of 3 counts) and rpm, although there is a 17* in a cell 2 places over and down. I know 3 counts isn't alot considering what the stock tune was showing (upwards of 15 counts in certain areas), so should I even bother pulling my hair out to get rid of this little annoyance? Also for some reason it seems the warmer the weather gets, the less knock I see at all.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 08:19 PM
  #2  
fryedchikin's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Can you log a couple WOT pulls and post the results so we can see what your AFR's look like ?.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 09:41 PM
  #3  
Slo_crx1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 821
Likes: 1
From: Simpson, PA
Originally Posted by fryedchikin
Can you log a couple WOT pulls and post the results so we can see what your AFR's look like ?.
WOT in 3rd and 4th doesn't have any issues. 0 knock all the way to redline. It's only on the lower rpm part throttle where load starts to ramp up as the turbo starts spooling. Out of boost ramping up sits consistently around 12.3-12.5 and onset of boost drops to 11.9 during the first 1-3 psi and then drops even further to around 11.3 consistently. I just swapped a walbro 255 in yesterday to replace the Evo 9 pump I had been running, so if anything the afr's would be a tad richer.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 10:20 PM
  #4  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
yeah low load knock sux!

I was trying to tune mine out before someone tried to kill me!

I was going to flash back to stock to see if it still did it! I suspect its fine, because its only intermitant...
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 10:47 PM
  #5  
BCOZEVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 1
From: OC - SoCal
This has been happening to me the last few weeks, so i loaded the JDM MIVEC map today and now its gone. But I still have more logging to do to be sure.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 12:21 AM
  #6  
Slo_crx1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 821
Likes: 1
From: Simpson, PA
Glad to see I'm not the only one with this issue then lol. I'm going to take a look at the stock map in the morning and see if there are any large differences there compared to mine. Only thing I can think of is the large jump in timing causing it, although ATM I'm not sure why it keeps adding timing above what I have it set to. Perhaps something to do with the lean spool timing advance map?
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 06:51 AM
  #7  
justboosted02's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 14
From: northeast
Originally Posted by Slo_crx1
Glad to see I'm not the only one with this issue then lol. I'm going to take a look at the stock map in the morning and see if there are any large differences there compared to mine. Only thing I can think of is the large jump in timing causing it, although ATM I'm not sure why it keeps adding timing above what I have it set to. Perhaps something to do with the lean spool timing advance map?

your sure your low octane timing map values are less than your high octane timing map values?


I purchased a vendor map (which was garbage and ive since tuned the car myself) where they had modified the high octane timing values but did not touch the low octane timing, this led to points where my low octane timing values were higher than my high octane values
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 08:31 AM
  #8  
lemmonhead's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 2
From: wexford,pa
is this knock of 2-3 for long periods of time, or is this a spike?
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 08:37 AM
  #9  
Slo_crx1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 821
Likes: 1
From: Simpson, PA
Originally Posted by justboosted02
your sure your low octane timing map values are less than your high octane timing map values?


I purchased a vendor map (which was garbage and ive since tuned the car myself) where they had modified the high octane timing values but did not touch the low octane timing, this led to points where my low octane timing values were higher than my high octane values
Yes, the low octane fuel map is setup to run richer just in case, not an extreme amount but a few afr points. During my initial tuning I had them both set the same to try and keep it predictable.
As for the low octane timing map, the same thing applies...both were the same for tuning purposes and now the values are retarded a few degrees for a "just in case" incident. I just still can't figure out why it keeps advancing timing at the onset of knock. Even after looking at the boost enhancement adv/ret map it shows advancement added on to the timing map, but no where near the load range that this issue is at.

After looking at the stock timing map it shows 20* timing advance in that same load area, and right now I'm only at 10* currently. I wonder if I don't have enough timing and the sensor is picking up the ignition on the downward stroke of the piston?

Last edited by Slo_crx1; Dec 31, 2007 at 08:43 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 08:52 AM
  #10  
mplspilot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 1
From: Flyover country.
10* or 20* BTDC is not downward stroke. It's also impossible to get pre-ignition on downward stroke. You'd probably melt the pistons if you did.
Why did you reduce it from 20 though? Low loads work with stock values just fine usually.

You should just post pics of the map. Your original post is kind of vague.

Last edited by mplspilot; Dec 31, 2007 at 08:56 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 09:21 AM
  #11  
Slo_crx1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 821
Likes: 1
From: Simpson, PA
Originally Posted by mplspilot
10* or 20* BTDC is not downward stroke. It's also impossible to get pre-ignition on downward stroke. You'd probably melt the pistons if you did.
Why did you reduce it from 20 though? Low loads work with stock values just fine usually.

You should just post pics of the map. Your original post is kind of vague.
I reduced the timing in that section because I had originally been seeing around 15 counts of knock in that area during the warmer months.

Here's a shot of it currently...



The only thing that might be causing the issue is the group of cells around the highlighted area in the fuel map that's set at 13.4afr, probably should go a bit richer for them, although in comparison the stock afr map for that range is much leaner with much more timing advance. Only the low octane stock map drops down to 12.6 afr in that load cell, and the low octane map for my modded rom is in the 12.8 afr range.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 09:40 AM
  #12  
GTLocke13's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 667
Likes: 1
From: Yorklyn, DE
You have a log? You've got the timing jumping from 4 to 11 degrees in adjacent cells. That can cause knock. You actually have big jumps in timing from 2500 - 3000 all the way up to 200 load.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 09:46 AM
  #13  
mplspilot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 1
From: Flyover country.
Originally Posted by Slo_crx1
I reduced the timing in that section because I had originally been seeing around 15 counts of knock in that area during the warmer months.

Here's a shot of it currently...



The only thing that might be causing the issue is the group of cells around the highlighted area in the fuel map that's set at 13.4afr, probably should go a bit richer for them, although in comparison the stock afr map for that range is much leaner with much more timing advance. Only the low octane stock map drops down to 12.6 afr in that load cell, and the low octane map for my modded rom is in the 12.8 afr range.
GTLocke13 is right, your map is very bumpy. 4, 11, 7 in a row. You should smooth things out and it should help.

Check this thread out and see what people are doing:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=308720
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 12:01 PM
  #14  
DanInPA's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Chester Springs, PA
^^ beside above comments about timing... You retarded timing too much for stoich AFR areas.... I would replace the load zone 0 through 120 with stock high oct timing map and start all over again.... Meaning, log and reduce timing as necessary... Also, is your car really hitting 240... 220 timing will definately produce knock from 3500 to 4500.... It is too aggressive for my test even for 93 oct...
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 01:34 PM
  #15  
Slo_crx1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 821
Likes: 1
From: Simpson, PA
Originally Posted by DanInPA
^^ beside above comments about timing... You retarded timing too much for stoich AFR areas.... I would replace the load zone 0 through 120 with stock high oct timing map and start all over again.... Meaning, log and reduce timing as necessary... Also, is your car really hitting 240... 220 timing will definately produce knock from 3500 to 4500.... It is too aggressive for my test even for 93 oct...
Load zone's 0-120 are very close to the stock settings, the only differences are near the highlighted zone, they're retarded a bit. As for load, I actually see 256 at peak load, so I'm dangerously close to the end of the map and really need to start rescaling. The top end and peak load usually has no knock what so ever on 93 octane.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:46 PM.