Defi BF vs JDM Map accuracy
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
Defi BF vs JDM Map accuracy
Okay here's the thing. I am looking to get a wideband setup in the next week. I have decided the "innovate" problems that are popping up everywhere dont suit my needs so I will probably be going with the Zeitronix ZT2. Anyways I am kinda in a dilema. I am wondering if anybody has compared the accuracy of their Defi BF to say JDM map on their car or the Zeitronix map sensors. I want to make sure the Defi's are indeed very accurate. If they are I will most likely just get a JDM map for logging purposes. If not I was thinking I could go with the whole Zeitronix setup (boost, egt, a/f). I can't afford to have both so I want to know if anybody has found their Defi BF's (mainly boost and EGT) to be truely accurate or not. I know most say they are accurate but I want assurance if that makes sense.
In my case, I don't know which one is more accurate: my Defi BF, JDM MAP, or HKS EVC6.
My Defi reading is 0.8 psi higher than my JDM MAP, and HKS EVC reading is about 0.5 psi lower than the JDM MAP.
I myself consider the JDM MAP to be the standard/more accurate for tuning purpose.
My Defi reading is 0.8 psi higher than my JDM MAP, and HKS EVC reading is about 0.5 psi lower than the JDM MAP.
I myself consider the JDM MAP to be the standard/more accurate for tuning purpose.
Last edited by Chamama; Mar 30, 2008 at 12:43 AM.
If you adjust the JDM MAP offset in EvoScan correctly (adjust it until you log 0.000psi with the key on/engine off), it should be the most accurate source for boost logging.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
I guess maybe I could just get a JDM map then just view my Defi as a reference. I just want to make sure its alteast within 1psi of a JDM Map. So if I am tuned according to the JDM map but my Defi reads something totally different that would defeat the purpose of having those expensive gauges.
Trending Topics
Okay here's the thing. I am looking to get a wideband setup in the next week. I have decided the "innovate" problems that are popping up everywhere dont suit my needs so I will probably be going with the Zeitronix ZT2. Anyways I am kinda in a dilema. I am wondering if anybody has compared the accuracy of their Defi BF to say JDM map on their car or the Zeitronix map sensors. I want to make sure the Defi's are indeed very accurate. If they are I will most likely just get a JDM map for logging purposes. If not I was thinking I could go with the whole Zeitronix setup (boost, egt, a/f). I can't afford to have both so I want to know if anybody has found their Defi BF's (mainly boost and EGT) to be truely accurate or not. I know most say they are accurate but I want assurance if that makes sense.

Thats why on this forum when people get too excited about the "Accuracy" of the more expensive gauges over the cheaper ones in many cases its not necessarily more accurate. I believe Naji at one point had a post on here about the accuracy of his Defi boost gauge but I could be wrong.
Last edited by codgi; Mar 30, 2008 at 11:55 PM.
In your EvoScan Data.xml:
In the above code, where it says Eval="0.19347*x-14.51025", the 14.51025 is what I'm subtracting to get the reading to log 0.0000psi.
Do a log with the key on/engine off and see what it shows for JDMMAP. If it's positive, then you need to subtract more. If it's negative, then you need to subtract less.
Example: Your Data.xml reads
You log 0.1412psi with key on/engine off. You need to change Eval to
Code:
<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="JDM MAP" LogReference="JDMMAP" RequestID="38" Eval="0.19347*x-14.51025" Unit="psig" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="-15" GaugeMax="30" ChartMin="-15" ChartMax="30" ScalingFactor="1" Notes=""/>
Do a log with the key on/engine off and see what it shows for JDMMAP. If it's positive, then you need to subtract more. If it's negative, then you need to subtract less.
Example: Your Data.xml reads
Code:
Eval="0.19347*x-14.5"
Code:
Eval="0.19347*x-14.6412"
The JDM Map and the Zeitronix map have been logged simultaneously and logged the EXACT curve. The Zeitronix is accurate to 0.1psi and you can calibrate it to YOUR local atmospheric pressure on your laptop by hitting one button while the key in ON and the engine is OFF. If you want a good heads up digital reading, grab the Zeitronix boost sensor and grab their 52mm gauge.
Last edited by Jack_of_Trades; Mar 31, 2008 at 03:39 PM.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
Well I found a good deal on the Zeitronix ZT2 so I decided to go with that. On my Defi's I just love the way they look and the features they have so I have to keep them. So as far as simplicity goes should I go with the Zietronix map or JDM map, can the Zeitronix map be logged in Evoscan also? This way for tuning I can log everything I need but when driving I can have a nice gauge to give me a pretty close estimate of what I am running (if indeed the Defi are within 1psi of the JDM or Zeitronix map hopefully). To me atleast this sounds the best bet right now. Any more suggestions are much appreciated and thanks for the help guys
Last edited by dbsears; Mar 31, 2008 at 03:30 PM.
Every sensor offered by Zeitronix can be logged in evoscan and you can read your boost with a display in the futire so I feel its a better choice for most users.
Last edited by Jack_of_Trades; Mar 31, 2008 at 04:12 PM.








