Notices
ECU Flash

worried about my tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 11:58 PM
  #1  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
worried about my tune

Hey Guys,

Sorry for the big image, but its easier to see what I'm talking about.

Initially I thought it was a miscalibrated WB, but after 4 different calibrations (car off for 12 hours in-exhaust calibration) I still get the same results.

So the question is, does my Fuel Map look about right for those AFR's I am getting.

If I lean out the Fuel map by 1point (to get my desired AFR of 11.7) the fuel map looks pretty dangerous - ie too lean!

Any comments welcome!



Mods: frontpipe (you call it a down pipe), ralliart filter, 3port GM to hold about 20psi of boost, super duper MIVEC map. LEANSPOOL is OFF!

Cheers
D.

Last edited by tephra; Apr 9, 2008 at 12:04 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 12:00 AM
  #2  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
I should mention that apparently if you do a calibration and the air ISN'T free then the WB will read richer on the rich side of stoich and leaner on the lean side of stoich.

Hence why I thought my WB was out, because an AFR of 10.7 is pretty rich for that fuel map - I think neways
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 12:44 AM
  #3  
monsta's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 129
Likes: 1
From: Dunedin New Zealand
If your injectors are scaled correctly and your fuel trims are correct, it doesnt matter what the numbers in the fuel are, as long as your wideband reads what you want and you arent knocking.

Because of the vast amount of meth that I run, some parts of my fuel map are leaned out (numbers wise) to 16.0 but Im readin 11.4 on my wideband.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 12:56 AM
  #4  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
yeah fuel trims are correct!

understand your point about fuel map numbers being irrelavant, however I would have thought cars with the same mods should have the same numbers (within say 0.3)
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 01:28 AM
  #5  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
That fuel map looks too lean to me for the mods you have.

Are you running an innovate? Be sure to ground it correctly.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 02:36 AM
  #6  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
yeah thats what I'm worried about.

LC1 - Its grounded properly!

I am going todo a proper free air on it, as well as fix this exhaust
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 05:11 AM
  #7  
recompile's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 10
From: New Hampshire, USA
As far as I know, a mis-calibrated wideband will always read leaner than actual. The only time it would read richer than actual is if it was too close to the exhaust manifold.

Have you changed intake or injectors at all? New injector & MAF scalings would have an impact on the fuel map. Also, as the air warms up and gets less dense, the same fuel map will likely get progressively richer and richer, meaning you need to lean it out like you're doing now.

2 weeks ago, I was on the dyno and making perfect 11.5 AFRs, it was a cold day.
2 days later, it was very humid and muggy, probably a 15°F temp difference plus humidity... without any changes to my car, I was running 10.9, 10.8 AFRs on the same tune, same boost, same fuel, etc.

Last edited by recompile; Apr 9, 2008 at 05:15 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 05:14 AM
  #8  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
nope stock car except for the downpipe..

LC1 forums/support dude says richer on the rich side and leaner on the lean side.. what makes you think it will always read leaner?

did your loads change? it would be interesting to log the temp+baro corrected load in that scenario...

Last edited by tephra; Apr 9, 2008 at 05:18 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 05:17 AM
  #9  
recompile's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 10
From: New Hampshire, USA
Well, if it's calibrated to think that free air is actually air with fuel in it... then it makes sense that it will be offset by that much throughout the whole lambda range.

I can't see how it would read richer than actual if you tell it "This air here which is loaded with fuel is actually perfectly clean, free air". That should only lead to false lean readings. Plus when a sensor is at the end of its life (exposure to a lot of leaded fuel, etc.) it starts to read too lean.

I could be wrong, though.

Last edited by recompile; Apr 9, 2008 at 05:20 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 05:20 AM
  #10  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
hrmm its hurting my brain...
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 05:24 AM
  #11  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
what's your mod list ?
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 05:26 AM
  #12  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
Mods: frontpipe (you call it a down pipe), ralliart filter, 3port GM to hold about 20psi of boost, super duper MIVEC map. LEANSPOOL is OFF!
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 05:53 AM
  #13  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
tephra,

For your free air calibration, just do it coasting in gear with no throttle. The engine will pump enough free air to evacuate the exhaust nearly immediately. This will give you a good calibration.

Do this:

If you can find a downhill part of road, even better, if not, just do this:

1. Use one of the higher gears, like 3rd, 4th, 5th. You probably won't have enough road to get to the speeds necessary in 5th, but maybe 3rd or even 4th. 3rd may be safest.

2. So, let's say you are in 3rd. Do a pull up to near redline, then just let off the throttle...keep it in gear.

3. You should see your LC-1 flashing 20.9 nearly instantly. This is the LC-1 measuring 20.9 % O2 in the air. This is the time that you should calibrate the LC-1.

4. After you let off the throttle and the LC-1 begins flashing 20.9, give it a second or two to make sure that all gases are evacuated from the exhaust. Then, do your calibration before your RPMs drop to about 1500 or so, where the ECU will begin to fire the injectors again.

If you are going downhill, you will have a longer time, but even on a flat road, this is very easily doable. I have calibrated my LC-1 like this several times and it takes a matter of seconds, rather than having to wait overnight or longer.


Eric
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 05:58 AM
  #14  
dsmjeffro's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: lindenwold NJ
looks a little lean but you should be ok
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 06:01 AM
  #15  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
Yup ive seen that method on the forums, but how can we be sure it works? i suppose log IPW and so long as no fuel gets injected then the engine is just a big air pump...

this is all moot really because I need to get my leaky exhaust fixed first
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:08 AM.